Bad Left Hook: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

Enzo Calzaghe loves to talk

Enzo_280x390_454721a_medium Source: Setanta

"Simply because I don't feel (Kelly Pavlik) deserves a shot yet at the big-time. On the back of one performance against a subdued, light fighter. There's a vast, vast difference between Gary and Joe Calzaghe. Gary would be the first to say that. It's chalk and cheese."

Can all of this get any more transparent, at this point? There are a few possibilities.

1. Enzo Calzaghe is bonkers, and actually thinks that a 39-year old Roy Jones, Jr., that hasn't beaten anyone in FIVE YEARS is really a tougher test of his son's skills and precious undefeated record, than is current middleweight world champion Kelly Pavlik.

2. The Calzaghes are scared of Pavlik. I don't think this is true, for the record.

3. They're all -- both camps -- angling to make this a big "blood" fight sometime in 2009, and throwing as many notable quotables out there as possible.

I lean toward the third one, myself.

The Calzaghe-Jones fight is being reported by a lot of the UK outlets as being fairly certain for September 20, with HBO offering that date after it was abandoned by Oscar and Floyd.

I know some folks are talking it up like Jones has a shot. Calzaghe just beat Bernard Hopkins, and even if you thought Hopkins deserved the decision as he wheezed his way down the stretch, you will admit it was a very close fight between two world-class champions.

Jones hasn't beaten anyone in half a decade. Tito Trinidad pumped up to 170 pounds with years out of the ring doesn't count as anyone -- sorry. Can Enzo Calzaghe honestly say he thinks that Jones is currently one of the best pound-for-pound fighters in the game? Better than Pavlik? TODAY? In today's modern world?

They've said it themselves: they're fighting the best fighter of the 1990s. We're almost done with the 2000s.

But I really do think that if both guys stay unbeaten, Calzaghe-Pavlik should happen in 2009. Pavlik will have to fight Arthur Abraham before then, most likely, which will only serve to raise his profile globally.

For now, let 'em talk, I guess. And talk. And talk and talk and talk...

0 recs  |  Comment 3 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The best Enzo comment:

“No one in the UK knows who Pavlik is.” I read this somewhere lastnight I forgot where. Maybe he should get this quote, “A lot of people even in the boxing world do not know who Calzaghe is in the US.”

I aways tell the truth. Even when I lie.

by CRAZEDANG1280 on Jun 26, 2008 11:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

1. No he really can’t think that. He knows that Jones is the safer fight and will make them ALOT more money.

2. Not scared, but like I said earlier, they know Jones is alot safer then Pavlik.

3. Maybe, but I really think Joe retires if he beats Jones. It’s only a matter of time before age catches up with JC. I have no problem with fighters stepping down as they get older. Nobody wants to travel down the embarrassing path that old has-beens follow where they think they still got it.

by erod on Jun 26, 2008 11:39 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

maybe it's me

But I just can’t see Joe walking away that soon. He’s still in great shape, and he seems intensely competitive. I think the itch will get at him quickly even if he does briefly hang ‘em up.

"Yesterday I was lying, today I am telling the truth." -- Bob Arum

Camden Chat
Bad Left Hook

by SC on Jun 26, 2008 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Bad Left Hook, covering boxing 365 days a year.
Start posting on Bad Left Hook »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.


Managers

9018_185776360922_747385922_4256197_5272137_n_small SC

Editors

Simpson_small Brickhaus

Boxing_icon_small Matt Miller