Pavlik-Hopkins possible? Change for Mosley-Mayorga?
Steve Kim of Max Boxing is reporting that negotiations between middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik and welterweight titleholder Paul Williams have hit a roadblock, as negotations often do, and that there is now very serious talk of Pavlik taking on 43-year old Bernard Hopkins on October 18, a fight that would be shown on HBO pay-per-view.
ANOTHER pay-per-view? Well, hang on...
There are also rumors that the proposed October 11 PPV "showdown" between Shane Mosley and punching bag Ricardo Mayorga will be moved to September 27, off of pay-per-view. The 9/27 date was originally slated for Pavlik, but HBO is wisely assuming that a great number of boxing fans will not pay to see Mayorga-Mosley instead of Showtime's double-header of Samuel Peter-Vitali Klitschko on tape delay and a live clash between Antonio Tarver and Chad Dawson.
But it has to be said again, because these things really need to be voiced by someone -- by everyone, really, since everyone has the same feeling, and it's not just you or me here.
The amount of upcoming PPV boxing is ridiculous. I'm sorry, but it is. Casamayor-Marquez and Calzaghe-Jones on back-to-back Saturdays in September, and one of these two (Pavlik-Hopkins or Mosley-Mayorga) in October? That's about $150 of pay-per-view in 30 days.
Is Bernard Hopkins really going to sell a fight? Was Shane Mosley? As great as both are, neither have been drawing cards without big-name opponents like, I dunno, Oscar de la Hoya.
Eh, what can you do? This is business as usual. Boxing fans are being gouged and wondering where we're supposed to come up with 150 extra clams to see some fights.
0 recs |
5
comments
Read Related
Comments
Would not be too interested.
I will still watch but I won’t be paying to see these, I’ll find someway to catch it somewhere else in my area without having to pay.
What next? PPV Price increase after the new digital receivers drop?
"I wasn’t at the show [Holt-Torres II], Steve, as I covered UFC 86." - Kevin Iole
by CRAZEDANG1280 on Jul 17, 2008 4:45 PM EDT 0 recs
would it have been that crazy to have Calzaghe-Jones and Marquez-Casamayor
as co-features on one PPV?
management sez: recommend fanposts/fanshots/comments! Click 'reply' when replying to a comment! Flag jerkfaces!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jul 17, 2008 7:14 PM EDT 0 recs
I know it sounds crazy, but that is not a bad idea
God forbids we get in the way of the unprofessionalism of HBO
"I wasn’t at the show [Holt-Torres II], Steve, as I covered UFC 86." - Kevin Iole
by CRAZEDANG1280 on
Jul 17, 2008 9:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
wait...
Are you suggesting that HBO have a card that features a fight geared toward - I’m assuming - the Welsh and English, and also black Americans (I think?) IN ADDITION TO a fight geared toward the Latino market? ON THE SAME CARD?
This is progressive thinking and I am just not sure I like it! I’m a bit terrified.
"Yesterday I was lying, today I am telling the truth." -- Bob Arum
by SC on
Jul 18, 2008 9:25 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Calzaghe-Jones needs help
Well all of those fights do, really. Say what you will about King’s methods, but he did put on some entertaining cards. Pavlik / Hopkins is no more of a PPV fight than Calzaghe / Hopkins would have been. And honestly, I’ll lose a good deal respect for Kelly Pavlik for making that sort of fight. Mosley / Mayorga is a bad joke that I would not pay for if it cost half as much.
On a side note, God be with Oscar Diaz.
"I want to see ocean. I want to see black people. I want to see palms." - Wladimir Klitschko
by jrok on Jul 17, 2008 8:32 PM EDT 0 recs











