Bad Left Hook: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

Bad Left Hook Best of the Decade - Featherweight

Pacquiao and Marquez fought to a draw in a classic fight in the middle of the decade.

Pacquiao and Marquez fought to a draw in a classic fight in the middle of the decade.

Now that 2009 is getting close to wrapping up, it means this decade is almost over.  Before the end of the year, I hope to get through all the weight classes, presenting to you some choices for the best fighter in a given weight class in the decade.  I'm not going in any particular order here, but we'll get through all 17 weight classes. 

When voting, please only consider the time that the fighter was in the specified weight class during this decade.  Also, I'm not going to count obvious ballot stuffing when I tally these up at the end of the year.

Featherweight was somewhat of an odd division, as most of the best fighters were only there for a short while as a stop between 122 and 130, and three of the most prominent names all did most of their damage elsewhere.  Still, those three guys, in moving up, were able to beat most of the other top guys in the weight class.

Marco Antonio Barrera - The Baby Faced Assassin went 6-1 in the 126 pound weight class, all in title fights against top notch competition.  The wins include a major upset over Naseem Hamed, Erik Morales, Johnny Tapia, Kevin Kelley and Paulie Ayala.  The lone loss came to Manny Pacquiao.  During his reign, he was both the lineal champ and the Ring Magazine champ.

Chris John - John has gone 29-0-2 in the weight class in the decade, including 12 defenses of his featherweight title.  His best wins include Juan Manuel Marquez, Derrick Gainer, Rocky Juarez, Ratanchai Sor Vorapin, Tommy Browne, Oscar Leon, Hiroyuki Enoki and Osumo Sato.  The two draws were each avenged, one of which was a consensus bad decision with Rocky Juarez, and the other of which was a 4-round technical draw with Jose Cheo Rojas due to a headbutt.  The two primary criticisms of John are that he fought at home in Indonesia far too much, and that he went for long stretches where he was taking weak defenses and fighting mandatories.  Still, he's beaten 7 future and former titlists, and is one of the very few to hold a win over Juan Manuel Marquez, who was one of the top pound for pound fighters in the world at the time.

Juan Manuel Marquez - Marquez went 15-1-1 in the weight class and unified two titles in the process.  His best "win" was a draw with Manny Pacquiao that many feel Marquez actually won.  His other best victories include Derrick Gainer, Manuel Medina, Robbie Peden, Orlando Salido, Jimrex Jaca and Terdsak Jendaeng.  The lone loss came to Chris John in a fight in Indonesia that many felt Marquez also won.  After moving up from featherweight, he went on to ascend as high as the #2 pound for pound fighter in the world, although his scheduling did get considerably stronger towards the end of his reign and after he moved up to 130.

Erik Morales - El Terrible went 6-1 in the weight, including key victories over Paulie Ayala, In Jin Chi, Kevin Kelley and Guty Espadas.  He also lost to his bitter rival Marco Antonio Barrera in a shootout.

Manny Pacquiao - Pacquiao only spent four fights in the 126 weight class, but during that span he managed to fight two of the best and win the lineal featherweight title.  He had a controversial draw with Juan Manuel Marquez that, while many thought Marquez won, would have been a Pacquiao victory had one of the judges scored the first round of their fight properly.  He also dominated Marco Antonio Barrera to win the lineal title.  His other wins came over Fahsan 3K Battery and Serikzhan Yeshmagambetov.  While what he did at 126 was impressive, the current pound for pound king was able to do most of his damage elsewhere.


Others for consideration: Naseem Hamed (only 2-1 in the decade), Johnny Tapia, In Jin Chi, Oscar Larios, Derrick Gainer, Humberto Soto, Rocky Juarez

Poll
Who was the best featherweight of the 2000's?
Marco antonio Barrera
159 votes
Chris John
67 votes
Juan Manuel Marquez
127 votes
Erik Morales
50 votes
Manny Pacquiao
1626 votes
Other (Please specify in comments)
4 votes

2033 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 36 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Who the hell voted for Chris John?

"Boxing is dirty," said Casamayor. " The day I’m not ready to be a dirty fighter is the day I don’t fight anymore because it will mean that I have no heart for it anymore."

by Zocalo on Nov 29, 2009 6:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I did, but it doesn't matter much

Marquez cleared out a big chunk of the weight class (and would otherwise be my choice). John beat Marquez in my eyes, and has a few other very solid wins as well. Does he beat everyone else on the list? Probably not. There are about 3 or 4 different ways I could have gone here.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Nov 29, 2009 9:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Does he beat everyone else on the list? Probably not.

I looked at resume first… and then in my minds eye put them vs each other at this weight.

I have come to like John, but he can’t be the best at this weight class with MAB,Marquez, Morales, and Pacman in here when I think he would lose in every fight. Outside of the questionable Marquez win, Juarez might be the best guy on his ledger. He is a B fighter in a era of epic and HOF featherweights.

I don’t even know if John is a lock for the HOF. If Hammed isn’t… what does that say about John.

"Boxing is dirty," said Casamayor. " The day I’m not ready to be a dirty fighter is the day I don’t fight anymore because it will mean that I have no heart for it anymore."

by Zocalo on Nov 29, 2009 10:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with this. I don’t think John’s great. He’s better than Rocky Juarez, as is everyone else on that list and apart from that who did he beat? I thought he lost to Marquez but it’s close. The other guys each beat several A or at least B+ fighters.

"I swear to God, I'll take this ******* ball and shove it down your ******* throat" - Serena Williams

by lcollins1 on Nov 30, 2009 1:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think John is an HOF

But I don’t think anyone else on this list is either based solely on what they did at featherweight.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Nov 30, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

voted pacman. he demolished THE champ, and in my eyes he beat another candidate on this list

The Dude Abides

by battle axe of doom on Nov 29, 2009 6:55 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I went for Naseem. Even though his resume isn’t the greatest, his persona and ring fighting style made the division relevant and interesting again.

by cyke on Nov 29, 2009 7:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

pretty sure resume matters when choosing the best of the decade :p

The Dude Abides

by battle axe of doom on Nov 29, 2009 7:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, in the 90s.

Bad Left Hook
"If bulls**t was poetry, Ray 'Boom Boom' Mancini's name would be Shakespeare." -- Dennis Rappaport

by SC on Nov 29, 2009 7:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly what i was thinking … lol

by boxzilla on Nov 29, 2009 11:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Marquez

Bad Left Hook
"If bulls**t was poetry, Ray 'Boom Boom' Mancini's name would be Shakespeare." -- Dennis Rappaport

by SC on Nov 29, 2009 7:45 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Undefeated in my book....

At least for this decade…..Also Pacquaio? Really?

by waldo47 on Nov 29, 2009 9:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Put Pacquiao in the poll, and 5 times as many people suddenly vote...

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Nov 29, 2009 9:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

holy shit @ the pinoy power of voters

The Dude Abides

by battle axe of doom on Nov 29, 2009 9:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It shouldn’t be so lobsided.

"Boxing is dirty," said Casamayor. " The day I’m not ready to be a dirty fighter is the day I don’t fight anymore because it will mean that I have no heart for it anymore."

by Zocalo on Nov 29, 2009 10:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

think someone stuffed the ballot box …

by boxzilla on Nov 29, 2009 11:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also Pacquaio? Really?

he massacred the featherweight champ, and beat JMM (robbed of the decision), so why not pacquiao?

The Dude Abides

by battle axe of doom on Nov 29, 2009 9:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

4 fights.....

Best of the decade fighter fights four times? He could probably beat all the other choices but thats not what the poll is all about, at least IMHO.

by waldo47 on Nov 29, 2009 9:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta go JMM here. Yeah, Pacquiao dominated in his short stint here, but JMM was winning for quite a while before Pacman moved up here, and, as has been said, he beat Pacquiao, despite the draw. Pacman will be the fighter of the decade elsewhere…

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Nov 29, 2009 9:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Marquez for me--and with little hesitation.

I thought about John, but then I just thought about watching him fight and watching Marquez fight, and I couldn’t see it. My eyes tell me Marquez is clearly the superior fighter, and he has an extensive enough resume in the weight class to be in the conversation. I also thought Marquez beat John, though he didn’t look his best that night.

The fact is, if you listed Pacquiao in every weight class he fought in, regardless of who he beat, he would dominate every time in every fan poll. I suppose it’s just human nature, but it kind of makes me sad that boxing fans can be so single-minded about one fighter. And I’m not saying it’s completely irrational even in this poll, but the margin of votes is just silly.

And before I get accused of being a hater, please consider this post.

Boxing writer: "Iran, what are you going to do when you retire?"
Iran Barkley: "Rob your house"

by Matt Miller on Nov 29, 2009 10:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree on all points in regards to Marquez v. John.

"I swear to God, I'll take this ******* ball and shove it down your ******* throat" - Serena Williams

by lcollins1 on Nov 30, 2009 1:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Barrera

and I used to think it was cute when the Pinoy folk got a hold of one of our polls, but now it’s just getting ridiculous.

"I swear to God, I'll take this ******* ball and shove it down your ******* throat" - Serena Williams

by lcollins1 on Nov 30, 2009 1:45 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

beat of the best

y would pacman stay for too long at 126 if he already beat all the best in the division? pacman is the best featherweight of this decade. who else would pacman fight if he stayed in 126?

by new_guy on Nov 30, 2009 2:38 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree he would be

but he didn’t stay there. He left. And the question isn’t ‘who would be if he stayed’. The question who was the best of the decade.

And, while I certainly don’t question the greatness of Pac (i’ve been proved wrong too many times), he drew JMM, beat a good but past-prime Barrera and two guys not on the list. I think more than one guy has better wins purely within the 126.

"I swear to God, I'll take this ******* ball and shove it down your ******* throat" - Serena Williams

by lcollins1 on Nov 30, 2009 2:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I gave it to Barrera, he ended a couple careers – Paulie Ayala and Naseem. He also beat Morales at 126, who’s on the list and Kevin Kelley and a ‘between prison stints’ Johnny Tapia. The guy had wars at 126 and won ’em all except against Pac. I think MAB defined the era at that weight while Pac came through the division like a lightning bolt.

I’m not going to sit here and say that MAB is the greater fighter, at any weight, but I think he posted the best skins and fought nearly everyone of real significance at the weight.

"I swear to God, I'll take this ******* ball and shove it down your ******* throat" - Serena Williams

by lcollins1 on Nov 30, 2009 3:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

beat a good but past-prime Barrera

Eh — Barrera was fighting at the top level until 2007 and Manny wasted him in 2003. I give him 100% credit for beating MAB the way he did. He wasn’t his absolute, very, very, very, very best in 2003, but he was still a fantastic fighter.

Bad Left Hook
"If bulls**t was poetry, Ray 'Boom Boom' Mancini's name would be Shakespeare." -- Dennis Rappaport

by SC on Nov 30, 2009 3:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Pacquiao for me hands down

Barrera, Marquez and Morales all have better resumes in that division but this Pacquiao guy came into the division to fighter bigger men. He jumped right into the deep end of the talent pool taking on the best at 126 and defeated them all.

I have to give it to him on the strength of that alone not to mention I think he can beat anybody on that list anyway or anybody at 126 back in those days anyway.

Again I am giving this to him based on the fact that he fought reigning champions and worldclass fighters from his very entry into the division with no easy tune up fights or experience in that division. He litteraly jumped into the division and beat everybody who was anybody and then left.

by MannyPacquiao on Nov 30, 2009 3:36 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

This vote is shocking

i mean from all your posts and your name I couldn’t have seen this one coming. (Too sarcastic?)

by waldo47 on Nov 30, 2009 4:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, he picked Cotto to beat Pacquiao

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Nov 30, 2009 1:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just giving Manny a hard time…

by waldo47 on Nov 30, 2009 4:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I voted for Pacquiao

because he beat Barrera who otherwise I would have seen as the best of the decade. In retrospect, and after more thought, I wish I could retract that vote and vote Barrera but it hardly matters because this poll has been PINOYED!

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Nov 30, 2009 5:06 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I voted Barrera

I thought it was very tight between Barrera and Marquez for who gets it, but Barrera’s wins over Morales and Hamed just swayed it for me. Pinoy power is a joke – yes, support Manny at superfeather, but he simply didn’t do enough at 126 to be the fighter of the decade at the weight.

by OliGold on Nov 30, 2009 9:17 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I actually think you can very legitimately vote for Pacquiao, as his namesake explained. It depends on how you look at these things. But of course that’s not really what we have. Just ballot stuffing.

Thankfully most of us are more concerned with the discussion rather than the polls themselves. If we put up a poll about who the greatest fighter of all time is and included Manny, Sugar Ray Robinson and Tomasz Adamek, I guarantee you Robinson would come in third.

Bad Left Hook
"If bulls**t was poetry, Ray 'Boom Boom' Mancini's name would be Shakespeare." -- Dennis Rappaport

by SC on Nov 30, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just vomited in my mouth a little bit…..

by waldo47 on Nov 30, 2009 4:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Marquez

Pacquiao will go down as the greater fighter overall, but at Featherweight, Marquez was the man. One almost gets the feeling that the reason why Marquez’s resume isn’t as glittery as Morales’ or Barrera’s is because he was too big a risk for most guys and was ducked. I personally feel he would have beaten Morales and Barrera (would have cheered Morales though).

I actually scored Pac-Marquez 1 for Pacquiao, but concluded by the end that Marquez was the better fighter, if that makes sense. I mean, that’s gotta be one of the freakiest 1st rounds ever, but 10-6 was the right call. It was clear however that Pacquiao was on the receiving end of a boxing lesson that night, was in with an all-time great at the weight and an all-time great, period. Both men showed heart in that fight, and that night, I became a serous fan of both guys. Still, at 126, gotta go with Marquez.

by Areglado on Nov 30, 2009 4:35 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Bad Left Hook, covering boxing 365 days a year.
Start posting on Bad Left Hook »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.


Managers

9018_185776360922_747385922_4256197_5272137_n_small SC

Editors

Simpson_small Brickhaus

Boxing_icon_small Matt Miller