Mayweather-Pacquiao Update: Make that Pacquiao-Malignaggi?
If Monday's deadline for the Mayweather camp to agree to terms with the Pacquiao side holds true -- and that's unlikely -- you might want to get used to the idea of Manny Pacquiao facing Paulie Malignaggi on March 13 pay-per-view.
Martin Rogers of Yahoo! Sports reports that Richard Schaefer and Leonard Ellerbe both responded to Bob Arum's supposed "final offer," which would have everyone go in front of the Nevada State Athletic Commission and plead their case for or against the random blood testing that has been the sticking point in negotiations for this fight.
Richard Schaefer says it's not a commission issue:
"It does not make sense for this to become a commission matter. This is a contractual matter. The commission did not decide the weights or the purse split or how the foreign television rights would be sold."
Ellerbe was brief as well:
"Random is random. We are all intelligent people and we know what random testing is. That is what we want and it has not changed."
Ellerbe's quote doesn't really seem to match anything proposed or answer anything. Arum says they'll accept random testing if Nevada decides to do it themselves with the help of an outside company, but that they won't let Golden Boy or "Mayweather Promotions" decide who does the testing. Freddie Roach feels that the USADA is too stringent, which is a strange thing to say given that their entire job has nothing to do with flexibility. I mean, that's kind of the point. Not feeling like it right that second isn't an acceptable excuse for them, and there's a reason for that. What they do is quite important if they're assigned to do it.
I still have to believe that neither of these guys or their promoters will allow for this money to be left on the table. Sure, you can revisit the fight later in the year, but it'll have lost something. The public is demanding this fight now. When you've got something like this, something so white hot that it transcends the sport, you don't screw around with it and put together stay-busy fights with Paulie Malignaggi. If I clear my mind of everything that could be, Pacquiao-Paulie isn't such a bad fight at all, and I think it's got major sleeper potential (well, as much "sleeper" as any Pacquiao fight can be) as a tremendous fight to watch, but it's just not OK.
If they lose this fight now, it'll never be as big as it could have been. There is a such thing as bad press, and in a sports era where everyone from the long-hated Barry Bonds to American national treasure Lance Armstrong has been dragged into the stink of the performance-enhancing drugs scandal, this is all bad press. Combine the steroids allegations (fair or not) with the fact that boxing's reputation has improved in the last couple of years but still has plenty of dirt to brush off its shoulders, and you've got a business disaster waiting to happen.
It's unthinkable that they could all screw this up, but it appears possible.
64 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I've always kind of held this underlying respect for Richard Schaefer.
He always seemed like the guy “who got things done”.
By the measure of grain of sand per minute that this fight isn’t made, I’m losing that respect….
I can accept Arum being difficult, because he always has been, but on this one it seems Arum is doing what he can, and the Floyd camp are prepared to simply bin this fight.
I’m starting to come round to the BrianBrock way of thinking, that Floyd isn’t doing this as a bargaining chip, he simply doesn’t want the fight. I hope this is untrue, but the inflexible nature of the quotes from the guys on his side of the negotiations seem to betray a certain reluctance.
Boxing is the beginning of all sports. I'm willing to bet that the first sport was a man against another man in a fight. (Omar Epps)
I still doubt that Floyd is scared of Manny per se. But I do think Floyd considers it to be a higher priority to trash Manny’s reputation than to fight him.
I agree.
But, just so it’s clear, I never used the word ‘scared’…..
Boxing is the beginning of all sports. I'm willing to bet that the first sport was a man against another man in a fight. (Omar Epps)
Also, as they say, the Cossacks work for the Czar. While Schaefer hasn’t exactly covered himself in glory in these negotiations, he ultimately can’t really be blamed here, nor for that matter can Arum. Both those guys can only push the negotiations as far as their fighters will allow them to.
It isn't necessarily right for him to take the stances he has, though....
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment." (SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
Despite how often I find myself saying
that a thing like this won’t make them walk away from all that money, the niggling doubts in my mind are starting to grow.
"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey
If they are still haggling over this by the 2nd week of January, then I will stop letting this affect me as much as it does.
Part of me wants to believe that its just more of Manny’s stubbornness (sp?) coming through like with the ODLH, Hatton, and Cotto negotiations, but when you have as much of a tangled web as you got here then maybe it is hopeless.
Hustler for Death, No Heaven for a Gangster
Dissapointing
Another blow to boxing if this fight doesn’t come off.Even if they push it back and do it in september or whenever,it still means Mosley is gonna be even older,so that fight isn’t as appealing (unless they can do Mayweather v the Mosley/Berto winner-i doubt that).
I’m a fan of Manny but i have to admit,he comes out of this looking the worse if it doesn’t happen.He can’t expect some people not to be suspicious.
No way would i pay to see Manny v Malignaggi.Rubbish.Paulie would either get flattened or run all night but whatever,he just hasn’t got a big enough profile.
BLOOD FEUD!!!!
Although it looks worse as each day passes, this fight happens March 13th, this hype job got a little out of control, but everybody IS talkin’ about it. GBP and Top Rank, and their respective fighters, just ain’t gonna leave 200 million dollars in OUR pockets. To believe that a prize fighter would negotiate his way OUT of 40 million dollars is being very naive. Peace!!
Well we will find out if you are right today because Arum has said if GBP don’t agree to terms,they are going with the Malig fight.I wouldn’t be so sure this fight is gonna happen.At least,not in march.
Well we will find out if you are right today because Arum has said if GBP don’t agree to terms,they are going with the Malig fight.
Ultimatums hold up about as well as retirements most times
Bad Left Hook
"If bulls**t was poetry, Ray 'Boom Boom' Mancini's name would be Shakespeare." -- Dennis Rappaport
by Scott Christ on Dec 28, 2009 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
BLOOD FEUD !!!!!
Yeah Matt I hear ya’ but Arum IS the guy who said, “yesterday I was lyin’, today I’m tellin’ the truth”. This fight, as the author suggests, loses a lot of its appeal if they don’t nail it down NOW, while the gun is still smokin’. The PR team for BOTH sides will get these guys in line today or tommorrow. Peace!!
USADA is too stringent
Doesn’t the USADA test Olympic boxers? If so, then what’s the deal. Many boxers ares subject to blood tests. It’s a random drug test.
I understand what Schaefer is saying, after all th Commission doesn’t handle broadcast rights, nor do they dictate who gets a larger share of the purse, ppv revenue, etc. I don’t see what the major issue is.
Happy Holidays and A Happy New Year
On ESPN this is generally
being reported as Mayweather being unreasonable which is surprising to see.
"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on Dec 28, 2009 10:55 AM EST reply actions
Surprising, but justified.
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
I suspect Dan Rafael has something to do with that. It isn’t how the coverage started out when the story first broke.
Yeah props to Rafael for reporting this well
"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on Dec 28, 2009 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
That’s the major benefit of Pacquiao threatening a lawsuit. People are being more careful with their words, especially implications that he refused to take a blood test.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Dec 28, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
I don't understand why Manny just won't go along with this
It is annoying, I’m sure, but it isn’t like Mayweather wouldn’t be subjected to the same testing. Someone has to have told him by now that the blood withdrawn to be tested is so minuscule that it would not have the least effect on his performance. Even if it did, Mayweather would be put at the same disadvantage, making the whole thing a wash competitively. It has never been done before, but so what? Since when is more steroid testing ever possibly a bad thing for a sport?
We seem to be overlooking the fact that Manny’s reasons for not going along don’t make much more sense than the Mayweathers’ reasons for pushing for it to begin with. He’s set to make $30 million dollars minimum, more than likely 40, and it is becoming very frustrating that he has lost such sight with the real world for him to believe that that money isn’t worth it. Isn’t that why we loved Manny, or at least a part of it? He was a man of the people. Now $40 million dollars isn’t worth being woken up at 2 am and losing an vial of blood.
He’s being given a pass mostly because Dan Rafael filters the coverage on ESPN and he really, really hates Mayweather (the best part of his chats every day is often his posting someone pointing that out so he can refute it with the maturity of a four year old with classic name calling), but that won’t hold forever if he doesn’t give in. He’s going to be labeled a cheater. That is the way this works.
I also don’t understand why go to Paulie. I suppose he’s one of the only logical fights remaining, but he was the first one to raise the steroid issue. Why would he feel any different?
http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments
“Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, “Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment.”"
Well done for proving the point……
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
If making that slightly off concession isn’t worth thirty to forty million than he is losing me. I don’t think I can ever really get behind Floyd, but Manny is losing me too. This whole thing is just turning me away from the fight.
Part of what bothers me too is that it isn’t like the Mayweathers are asking for an advantage or something that wouldn’t be beneficial to the sport. If every single fight ever had that sort of testing, the sport would have more integrity and be better for it.
I wouldn't be surprised if you start seeing changes in the future because of this
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
I have no problem with change.
I just think it should come from the authorities in place, not Floyd Mayweather…..
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
lol
The point is, that if it was in the hands of Floyd, it wouldn’t be a ‘change’, it would simply be a one-off thing for his fight, and which he could take or leave as he saw fit.
If it was implemented by a sanctioning body, or a commission, it would be an across the board change, which would then be a positive change……
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
Sometimes that all it takes to get the waters moving
Your right that Floyd is just asking for this because it’s Manny. He may never ask for this again.
The way it may progress change is that some one from the sanctioning body might make an agenda out of this and then it gets brought up in a meeting, and so on.
Everyone laughed at Jose Conseco but he started moving the waters. Now his reasoning for moving the waters can be quetioned but he did start it.
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
Change?
- Cotto putting his title on line at a catch-weight limit.
- Or the dollar amount for each pound over the weight limit.
Is that normal or is that change?
Happy Holidays and A Happy New Year
by VeeisAnimated on Dec 28, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions
Catch weight fights
should count for belts as they are still technically within the correct division.
Paying for going over weight limits seems fair to me so long as it isn’t abused.
"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on Dec 28, 2009 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
There have been a lot of title fights at catchweights over the years. I know some people find the catchweights annoying, and I got to a point where I’d had enough quibbling over one or two pounds, too, but they’re not new.
Bad Left Hook
"If bulls**t was poetry, Ray 'Boom Boom' Mancini's name would be Shakespeare." -- Dennis Rappaport
by Scott Christ on Dec 28, 2009 1:29 PM EST up reply actions
Extended waits have helped fights before...
in situations like Leonard v. Hearns I. Boxing was bigger then, but ducking people (and drawing attention to ducking them) helped Leonard make fights bigger.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on Dec 28, 2009 12:44 PM EST reply actions
Really don't know why this is suprising to anyone....
Floyd hasn’t jumped at the chance to fight Cotto, Margarito, Mosley, Williams, or any other top guy, recently. Why would he do it now. He didn’t handpick Pac Man so I guess he won’t fight him.
If I’m Manny I move on and leave PBF, his camp and their buffoonery behind.
by SmittytheCutman on Dec 28, 2009 12:46 PM EST reply actions
As alternatives go I think Malignaggi is a very smart option...
As disapointed as I am about how things have unravelled this past week (albeit, like SC, I remain highly sceptacle that the fight will fall through), I think drawing Paulie as the replacement is a stroke of genius by Top Rank.
Here’s why:
1. He’s a relatively safe fight for Pacquiao – he sure as hell won’t get knocked out by the guy.
2. Paulie’s had a pretty good year and his stock is certainly up so it’s not like it drops to the depths of, say, a Matthew Hatton.
3. Stylistically he’s in the same lane as Mayweather. Given that Pac has pretty much only fought come-forward style fighters the past couple of years, this isn’t bad prep for a Mayweather bout. A 12-rounder with a slick boxer (with feather fists) might be just the thing.
4. PR-wise this is genius – beside Floyd Sr., Paulie has been most vocal re roids etc. To then get him to step in the ring with Pacquiao, and NOT demand blood tests, is a wonderful point to make. It would appear to invalidate the accusations and illustrate what they’ve always been – baseless.
5. Picking Paulie leaves Mayweather in a somewhat sticky situation re his alternative. He’s already under pressure to pick a legit opponent after Marquez. Clottey, PWill, the Berto/Mosley winner are all there – but much higher risk. Even though I don’t see Malignaggi as a dangerous fight for Pacquiao, he is certainly much stronger on paper than the possibilties Mayweather/GB have been putting forward as of late (Hatton, that young lad down in Mexico et al).
So: as much as I believe May/Pac will go ahead, if it’s postponed for now I think Paulie is a smart choice of opponent and not too bad a fight either.
The young lad in Mexico?
I might be having a mind burp, but who do you mean?
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
lol, I think he might be talking about JMM
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
He’s obviously talking about Canelo, Saul Alvarez. How quickly we forget that Shaefer brought him up as an opponent.
Did he? When? :-o
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
A few months back. Mostly focusing on Canelo’s ability to draw a big crowd and the idea that they could do 100K in Mexico City.
Bad Left Hook
"If bulls**t was poetry, Ray 'Boom Boom' Mancini's name would be Shakespeare." -- Dennis Rappaport
by Scott Christ on Dec 28, 2009 1:29 PM EST up reply actions
Point 4 is sort of missing the boat
Paulie will step in the ring with Manny under less stringent blood tests due to monetary reasons. I doubt there is anyone else he could fight that would get him a 7 figure pay day (there may be… but I sort of doubt it) and he would probably make 5 or 6 mil for that fight. Hell, I’ll step in the ring at 140 and fight Pac Man and I’ll let him use every PED thats ever been made for 5 mil (although against me, he wouldnt’ need any). He’s going to take the fight even if he believes Pac Man is cheating solely for monetary reasons, don’t read it as a comment on PEDs, but rather on his wallet. Floyd can make more money without Pac man (although the drop off is still large, its probably not as large percentage wise).
I agree with your concerns and would go as far as to say that Paulie is actually an awful opponent to go to in terms of PR. I’m interested in the fight as a fight so bring it on if the Floyd fight falls through, but, from Top Rank’s perspective, why would you go to the one fighter who you know is going to continue to make steroid talks an issue?
Paulie isn’t shy. Even if you put in his contract that he can’t mention steroids in any way, he’ll find some creative way to work it in. We’ve all seen how Paulie manages a situation in which he feels he is going to lose due to a non-level playing field.
Stylistically he’s in the same lane as Mayweather.
Not really. Different tactics, different stance, different defense.
"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on Dec 28, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions
I was thinking exactly this.
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
Yeah. They’re both quick. That’s about it. Malignaggi works exclusively off of (or just with) his jab, while Mayweather really doesn’t jab much at all. And that’s just the tip of the differences iceberg.
Bad Left Hook
"If bulls**t was poetry, Ray 'Boom Boom' Mancini's name would be Shakespeare." -- Dennis Rappaport
by Scott Christ on Dec 28, 2009 1:30 PM EST up reply actions
And it's a big fucking iceberg. :)
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
If this fight does not get made, where does either of these guys go? Pacquiao’s camp is already talking about Malignaggi as well as going after Yuri Foreman’s title (that would be the eight weight class in which Manny has won titles). Neither might be a terribly challenging fight for Pac, but when you look at Mayweather talking about Matthew Hatton, they’re still light years ahead in credibility.
by Monday Morning Martial Artist on Dec 28, 2009 1:22 PM EST reply actions
1) Agree with SmittytheCutman,
Floyd has not exactly jumped at top competition as a WW anyway. 2) This might all be a lot of pre-fight noise, or it might actually mean something, but I’m sure not losing any sleep over all the back and forth in the meantime. 3) If Floyd doesn’t fight Manny, he further tarnishes his “legacy.” 4) No matter what happens, I’d still like to see Floyd fight some real WW’s.
Pac-Mag
Good idea stylistically for the fight, terrible idea PR-wise. Paulie is quick (Speed I see as about equal) but has very good movement, which Pac should be able to deal with easily. However, Arum seems to be quickly forgetting two things, Paulie sure can whine about stuff, and when he whines at least some people tend to listen. If you don’t think that every day between the fight getting made, and the fight happening you are stupid, naive, or both. Here’s how this is going to play out.
Two sides will agree to no blood testing. A reporter will ask Paulie about it. Paulie: “You know I’m just going to fight the top level guys. Apparently to do that I have to get f*cked. It happened in Texas and its happening here. I can’t ask for a blood test. Floyd tried that and Manny ran away. So what do you want me to do? I’m getting a raw deal…etc.”
Post-fight interview: “He hit really hard. I wish I could say that it was legit, but he never took a stringent blood test so I guess we’ll never know. shrug”
If Arum makes this fight, you might as well call Manny, Barry Bonds, cause the steroid story is going to be front and center.
by Waldo Rastel on Dec 28, 2009 3:22 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I saw it exactly the way you described....
well,maybe not as well as you described it, but reading your description I could actually hear Paulie saying the words….
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
Had to watch an episode of Jersey Shore just to make sure I got it right.
by Waldo Rastel on Dec 28, 2009 6:50 PM EST up reply actions
I wish I understood that gag. Instead, I'm drunk
Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)
Here is one full episode
Its pretty ridiculous….watching may cause head explosion, but it will provide some drunken entertainment.
by Waldo Rastel on Dec 29, 2009 12:58 AM EST up reply actions
As a bad PR move and style re Paulie...
I can see where you guys are coming from re risk of taking Paulie fight and the allegations he’s made BUT:
I would see this move as somewhat discrediting the accusations that Malignaggi, Floyd Sr. et al have been making. Here you’d have one of the most vocal Pac-naysayers jumping at the chance to fight him, and prob without any bloodletting preconditions (or Pac’s team may use it as an opportunity to showcase their 3 stage blood test routine). Even if Paulie’s motivation for doing so is just the money – isn’t this the argument that most fans have been making re why Pac-May needs to get made?
Re smothering talk of steroid use: I was initially of the opinion that the longer Top Rank let this talk continue the worse for Pac. In fact, I believe that the longer this has been in the headlines the worse GB/Mayweather are looking. Top Rank have approached this fairly massive PR problem aggressively and I think floating Malignaggi’s name out there is all part of the same approach. Why else would he get brought up? Surely Foreman (and another belt) was seen to be top of the alternative pile? Malignaggi doesn’t bring much to the table despite being good at hyping a show and having a very credible past year.
Granted, Paulie would prob yap away before, during and after the fight about roids etc but I don’t think it would do much damage. In fact, Paulie would likely play out what we’d expect from Mayweather – thereby robbing Money of what his people obviously see as being a useful PR tool in a fight with Pacquaio.
Re style – sure, Paulie differs much from May but I guess what I meant is that in very basic terms he’s a defensive-minded boxer that would likely take Pacquiao over the stretch.
Re “the Mexican lad” – aye, it was Canelo I was thinking about. I had a good laugh when I read that. But I don’t put it past them…
I think if the fight does fall through, Mayweather would score massive brownie points by taking on the Mosley/Berto winner. It’d be much greater risk than Malignaggi/Foreman but would give May an added bargaining tool in future negotiations.
Ultimately though, I think May-Pac will happen. That sort of money can’t be made any other way for either of these guys. It would just be awful business if it fell through over tesing.
Mind games are endemic in boxing
Psychological warfare is nothing new to the sport and although Mayweather has now taken this to new extremes, I believe this is 1) a publicity stunt and 2) most definitely mind games. I think Floyd is very calculating and cunning when it comes to business and with Pacquiao he is absolutely testing the limits of how much power he commands in the sport. This stunt could go three ways, Pacman gives in (and the pressure being applied on him, for me, is unreasonable) , thus Floyd gets HIS way. Or perhaps Pacman will refuse and the Mayweather camp will perform a u-turn of sorts. The third alternative is the most grim for the sport and dictates that both camps remain stubborn and the fight is off.
I genuinely understand both points of view but the whole fiasco comes down to one person; Floyd Mayweather. His motives are not related to drugs in my opinion, he wants to get an upper hand on Pacman. Either way pacman will not come out of this unscathed, because if he gives in, it is a very symbolic victory for Mayweather in terms of the pre-fight hype. Call me cynical, but the history of boxing has made me so.
Pretty Boy…you clever boy. Either you fight pacman with a mental edge or you don’t fight him at all, but have the excuse of all excuses – so as to preserve your legacy. He was a “drug cheat”
I think the fight happens, because it’s serious money and the man they call ‘money’ will not resist a purse of that size.
As far as the future goes? Absolutely I’m all for random drug testing, but not when a fighter (even Pretty Boy) demands it, because then it becomes a psychological tool which can be wielded with the sole aim of fucking with their opponent’s head before they fight.
Mind games is part of boxing.
I agree with maxirap. PBF wants to have advantage psychologically. He knows when PACs latest defeat was when he fights Morales of which blood were taken near fight night. Random drug testing should be handled and mandated by the commission, so that it can be applied to all professional fights. Bobfather agrees to have blood taken even if in time of fight while walking to the ring, as long as mandated by the commission.
by gogoy on Dec 28, 2009 6:48 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I think that’s part of it. But in addition to that, I think Floyd wants to slander Pacquiao not just as a means to an end but also as an end in itself. Floyd has a history of petulance, attention-seeking, and immaturity, and he seems to resent the fact that Pacquiao has received so many accolades this year. My impression is that he views harming Pacquiao’s reputation in the sport as a positive good, independent of whether it helps him or not in a fight between them.
by taco pal on Dec 28, 2009 8:24 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I’ll believe the fight doesn’t happen when I start to see posters and a TV date for another fight in its place. Malignaggi is a foolhardy endeavour: He’s fast and tough enough to potentially be a spoiler, and yet fans remember that two guys Pacquiao has starched (Hatton and Cotto) are the guys who blew through Paulie; in short, no one will take the fight seriously, Juan Diaz fights or not.
The only replacement I’d consider caring about would be Tim Bradley.
I don't agree that
if the fight doesn’t come off (and I believe the fight will be held) that Floyd eases out looking better. Most seem to feel that his demands are over the line, and if he didn’t fight Manny, it would just be one more chapter in “Fighters Floyd Didn’t Face”: and that, historically, cannot = anything positive for Floyd. Whether it’s truly accurate or not, I believe that a majority of fans see Manny as having risen to the bigger challenges, and he is definitely willing to fight this match following current rules. Still think it’s all hype anyway, but hype has hardened into positions before, so—

by 



















