Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

HBO not warm to Zab Judah; has the network really repented?

Zab001_medium Rick Reeno of BoxingScene.com reports that HBO is cold to the floated idea of a 140-pound fight between Nate Campbell and Zab Judah, and that Campbell is "not the problem."

HBO -- which would prefer Campbell against Paulie Malignaggi or unbeaten St. Louis prospect Devon Alexander to Judah -- has said over and over since the debacle cards to close 2008 that they are not interested in bad fights, that they're focusing on the future of the sport more, and that promoters have to give them good, competitive matchups or they aren't buying the fight.

Campbell-Judah at 140 pounds would honestly seem to me to be a pretty good TV fight, a nice step up for Campbell in weight, and a much-needed step back down in weight for Zab, who (as I always have to point out) hasn't won a big fight in years.

It makes me wonder what the issue with Judah would be. It could be something like he's difficult in negotiations, which would be an "is what it is" sort of thing, or it could be that HBO simply isn't going to pay for Judah fights anymore.

Two years ago he was on PPV against Miguel Cotto, and the fight was really good. He had a pretty entertaining, competitive fight against Josh Clottey last August. He lost both. There's also, maybe, the time he cancelled his May 31 fight last year against Shane Mosley, which sent Mosley up to 154 pounds to fight Ricardo Mayorga off PPV, and put Judah into the Clottey fight. Judah last fought on the wretched Calzaghe-Jones undercard in November, winning a bore of a fight against Ernest Johnson where Judah seemed to lack fire. It was like he was sparring and had no intention of impressing anybody or finishing the fight.

If HBO would rather have Campbell-Malignaggi (which isn't as good of a TV fight, I don't think) or Campbell-Alexander (which is a much smaller bout, albeit cheaper, and with a top prospect), it really makes me think that Ross Greenburg and Co. are very serious about their boxing schedule. They gave us a lot of good stuff in '07 and '08, but 2008 ended with a dire series of fights and cards.

For $59.99 in December, we got to watch Manny Pacquiao dismantle an Oscar de la Hoya who looked like he left his fists and heart somewhere in Puerto Rico, but that happens, and it was a huge, intriguing fight nonetheless. Underneath that, though, was the pathetic sham of an undercard that featured three gross mismatches that all played out as expected. I said that night that if anyone at HBO, Top Rank or Golden Boy tried to say they didn't see something like that coming, they were full of it. As far as I recollect they didn't try to lie. They knowingly served us a terrible show.

The month before that, $50 bought you Calzaghe's one-sided rout of ancient Roy Jones and another terrible undercard, highlighted by Judah's snoozer and a bunch of club fighters.

HBO took some huge shots for these cards, and it seems like they've listened. The fact that 2008 officially ended for them with Wladimir Klitschko systematically taking apart yet another guy that didn't seem like he was interested in fighting back (Hasim Rahman) didn't help. And in the meantime, the tiny Versus Network aired a Fight of the Year candidate between cruiserweights Steve Cunningham and Tomasz Adamek for a fraction of the cost of anything HBO had going on.

So far in '09, HBO has delivered on their promise to give us only competitive matchups (at least on paper). This has been the schedule:

  • Jan. 17: Berto v. Collazo (BAD). Legit fight.
  • Jan. 24: Margarito v. Mosley (WCB). World-class fight.
  • Feb. 14: Campbell-Funeka (BAD). Legit fight, and a snakebitten-card that was supposed to have this as an undercard with Martinez-Cintron, main evented by Mayorga-Angulo. Even Angulo-Rivera, for a fight on four days' notice, was perfectly acceptable.
  • Feb. 28: Marquez-Diaz (WCB). World-class fight between the #1 and #2 lightweights in the sport. Even if Campbell had stayed at 135, it's #1 v. #3 at worst.

And here's what they have coming:

  • Mar. 7: Kirkland-Julio tripleheader (BAD). Legit fight. They're focusing on guys they want to use for years, like Kirkland (or Julio if he wins), Guerrero and Ortiz, and Guerrero and Ortiz are facing decent opponents. It's sink or swim for Daud Yordan, and Ortiz is up against a guy that's been a legit contender in the recent past. This is what Boxing After Dark is about.
  • Apr. 4: Lightweight Lightning PPV. HBO is distributing, Golden Boy producing. If you ask me, HBO should send their broadcasters and be there. Four legitimate fights on one PPV show.
  • Apr. 11: Williams v. Wright (WCB). Legit fight. Winky's comeback, and a stern test for Big Paul. Plus an undercard bout between the brawling heavy that HBO is big on (Arreola) and a veteran stepping stone (McCline).
  • Apr. 25: Lopez v. Penalosa (BAD). A great young fighter against a good veteran with a lot of tricks up his sleeve. Legit fight.
  • May 2: The Hatton-Pacquiao show. HBO does not have an official "HBO Pay-Per-View" on the schedule until May 2. Not one in January, February, March or April.
  • May 9: Dawson-Tarver II. Not an exciting fight, but a pretty legit fight considering the options, and it's happening because they want to showcase Chad Dawson as another piece of the future.

It's also still likely that Wladimir Klitschko will fight David Haye on HBO, I'd guess, and Miguel Cotto will be fighting someone, somewhere on June 13. Arum says they're shopping Clottey, Cintron and Berto as opponents to both HBO and Showtime.

This has happened before, where HBO tries to calm backlash by saying, "no more!" But right now, there's nothing on the schedule to really complain about. The closest you get is the Dawson-Tarver rematch, and Tarver is still a top five light heavyweight.

Nixing Zab Judah also comes on the heels of HBO passing on the Pavlik and Cotto PPV from February 21, which sent Top Rank out to broadcast it on their own. HBO felt there was no intrigue in either fight, or at least not enough for the asking price, and Pavlik and Cotto have been HBO staples the last couple years.

For now, HBO is doing right by the fans, and they deserve to be commended.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

All those fights and not to mention

that ESPN 2 and Showtime seem to be following there lead. They have some good fights coming up and have had some good ones already this year.

I would have liked to see Judah fight but I would really like to see Devon Alexander. He has been horribly managed for being such a supposedly good prospect.

by TXroyal on Mar 2, 2009 9:20 PM EST reply actions  

The Economy

Yeah, it’s a quality move by HBO, and after the great card last weekend, I’m completely on board with giving HBO some props on a good start to the year.

Another factor in this apparent trend relates to the economy. As households look to cut corners, HBO and Showtime are two of the first things to go (not for this “household,” of course—I’m just sayin’). So the pressure is on to give customers some memorable cards to keep them shelling out for their subscriptions.

How lame is it that it took the economy crashing down around us to get more legit fights on cable?

by Matt Miller on Mar 2, 2009 10:29 PM EST reply actions  

If you ask me, HBO should send their broadcasters and be there

Why? Don’t you like AC Slater MC’ing?

by Zocalo on Mar 2, 2009 11:16 PM EST reply actions  

Anyways… much props to Ross Greenburg. I think he finally got it… like MM said… it just took the downfall of our economy for things to get better in the sport of boxing.

The Judahs, Mayorgas of the world don’t help the sport out.. and shouldn’t be rewarded with the limelight.

by Zocalo on Mar 2, 2009 11:20 PM EST reply actions  

Judah is a bum. Waste of talent.

by cylee1180 on Mar 3, 2009 12:22 PM EST reply actions  

this is not intended to start an mma/boxing debate, but this post is why mma is bringing in new fans: i can bank on seeing fighters i know/recognize on a nearly monthly basis on the UFC…..i don’t intend to start a flame war, but hopefully HBO is seeing the error of their ways. marquez/diaz was superb, everything a good/anticipated fight should be with guys who aren’t over the hill/overhyped etc. I just wish there was more of that. i find myself more and more going to youtube or wherever to watch documentaries of hearns, hagler, sanchez et al……nostalgia, true. But, also, a lack of recent stars you really find yourself attached to as a viewer/fan of boxing.

Gatti.
Dekkers.
Pele.
Tadahiro Nomura.
Hidehiko Yoshida.
Aoki.
Kang.
Vanderlei.

by theworldsoldestsport on Mar 4, 2009 10:37 AM EST reply actions  

I don't have this

But I guess I can see how some would. I have an emotional attachment to a ton of boxers. HBO has done better this year with the re-design of World Championship Boxing, giving us quick soundbyte interviews and stuff. I think this is important. One thing UFC has done very well is build personalities and I felt boxing was badly lacking. The production for UFC is also more modern and fan-friendly. Boxing is slowly getting a clue about these things. Although I do hate UFC’s gladiator war man shit. Calm down and get something new.

Bad Left Hook
Camden Chat

"If they cut my bald head open, they will find one big boxing glove. That's all I am. I live it." -- Marvin Hagler

by Scott Christ on Mar 4, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools


Managing Editor

261987_10150306736470923_747385922_9782182_6616581_a_small Scott Christ

Editors & Moderators

Aki_hair_cropped_small Brickhaus

Boxing_icon_small Matt Miller

Profile_picture_small Brent Brookhouse

Ingo_small A.F.

Contributors

Belt_select_small Waldo Rastel

Chris_celletti_headshot_small Chris Celletti

Duran-dejesus_small Kory Kitchen

051_small Thomas Hill