Bad Left Hook: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

Freddie Roach now picking Pacquiao to stop Cotto

Freddie Roach had been touting Miguel Cotto as Manny Pacquiao's toughest test. He now picks Pacquiao to knock out Cotto in November. (Photo via www.boxnews.com.ua)

Freddie Roach had been touting Miguel Cotto as Manny Pacquiao's toughest test. He now picks Pacquiao to knock out Cotto in November. (Photo via www.boxnews.com.ua)

Trainer Freddie Roach has stopped talking with caution, and he's getting confident. After seeing Manny Pacquiao train, Roach now says that his fighter will knock out Miguel Cotto on November 14. Roach had previously said he saw the fight going to a decision, and hailed Cotto as the toughest test of Pacquiao's career. This came after fights where he said Manny would stop Oscar de la Hoya (it happened) and he'd take out Ricky Hatton fast (also happened).

From Dennis Principe at The Inquirer:

"I picked him to win by decision, but until I started working with him to this camp, the way he’s punching, his speed, we will knock this guy out."

...

"Basically we’re going to have a fast start and we’re not going to give [Cotto] any momentum. The way Manny is really fighting right now, I guess we’re going to frustrate Cotto with his speed."

Roach changing his tune could just be gamesmanship, but he's been right the last two fights. A confident, big-talking Freddie seems like good news for the Pacquiao camp.

0 recs  |  Comment 27 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Bad Left Hook

Pacquiao-Clottey picked up by HBO PPV

Jan 2010 by SC - 29 comments

Introducing Jose Benavidez Jr.

Jan 2010 by Brickhaus - 15 comments

Comments

Display:

9th round

The Vegas number is the 9th round.

by Haans Bishop on Sep 30, 2009 9:56 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

i don’t see him stopping Cotto, Cotto’s taken hard shots from legit welterweight bangers (Corley, Torres, Margarito, Mosley, etc) and never folded

by JohnUtah on Sep 30, 2009 10:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

in the event this does happen

which would be more impressive.. Mayweather taking apart Marquez or Pac knocking out Cotto..

by jerranamo on Sep 30, 2009 1:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

to me: definitely Pac KO’ing Cotto

"I swear to God, I'll take this ******* ball and shove it down your ******* throat" - Serena Williams

by lcollins1 on Sep 30, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mayweather taking apart Marquez was impressive?

by Areglado on Sep 30, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

rec’d for telling the 100% truf

The Dude Abides

by battle axe of doom on Sep 30, 2009 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

seriously bro, I was watching it with a friend (an MMA fan). He was impressed with Mayweather’s skills and the way he completely shut down JMM. I, however, was outraged and he couldn’t understand why. After the fight, I was trying to explain to him just how and why Floyd looked the way he did in that fight — it was a scam, smoke and mirrors. Marquez just wasn’t in the same galaxy in terms of physical ability, at least not at 147. The sad thing is, I totally appreciate Mayweather and his skills, I do. I think he’s brilliant. But he’s also a coward, a bully, an opportunist, and a man-child. If he were to just fight one, just ONE elite welterweight, I would be happy. I would shut up about him. Instead, who is fighting Miguel Cotto? The former flyweight champion of the world. It’s time for Money to grow a pair.

by Areglado on Sep 30, 2009 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

by an infinite margin

Pac knocking out Cotto. Agree with Areglado’s sentiment there

I hated every minute of training, but I said, ‘’Don’t quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.'’ (Bernard Hopkins)

by BrianBrock on Sep 30, 2009 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Question should have been: Mayweather taking apart Marquez or Cotto taking apart Pacquiao?

Twitter: @FlyByKnite

by FlyByKnight on Sep 30, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pac still more impressive

If Mayweather took apart Williams, he might have an argument.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Sep 30, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it depends a lot on the Cotto that shows up on the night.

If an incredible Cotto fights his heart out and Pac still wins it would be a very very big victory for him.

I think Roach may just be talking it up here but then again thats what I thought during the last 2 fights and his predictions were remarkably accurate.

Maybe Pac does belong at 147 and isn’t a lightweight with 20 pounds on him.

by MannyPacquiao on Sep 30, 2009 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think i can pretty confidently say that Pacquiao is NOT a welterweight. At least not by modern (last 30 odd years) standards for this sport. Most true welterweights today are men who walk around at 160 or close to that. Pacquiao could take a jog around the park, head to the can with the morning paper, and chew a pack of gum in a sauna and make the weight. If you told Pacquiao at 7 am that he’d have to make welterweight by say, 7 pm, that same day, I doubt it would bother him much. The guy walks around at 150-151. So no, Manny isn’t a true welter, and no, he does not “belong” at 147. He could certainly make occasional forays into the division, but I don’t think he could stay there without seriously jeopardizing his health.

Cotto is an interesting case because while he is thought of as a “big” welterweight in terms of weight, mass, by some, his actual ummm, “dimensions (?)” don’t differ a great deal from Manny’s. His head and body are well within Pacquiao’s punching range. Contrast that to someone like Paul Williams, or Kermit Cintron for instance, who Manny would have trouble hitting without taking some serious punishment himself.

I ask myself sometimes how Manny would fare against some of the welterweight legends of yesteryear and I see him losing against almost every single one: Napoles, Robinson(obviously), Gavilan, Trinidad, Leonard, Hearns, Cuevas, Benitez, Palomino, the list goes on… Now, at 140, things might be different.

by Areglado on Sep 30, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see Pac beating all of the above

save for Leonard and Hearns and the battle against Gavilan would be great.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Sep 30, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You actually see Pacquiao beating Robinson? (????)

Trinidad Pacquiao maybe, maaaaybe able to outspeed and frustrate. But could he avoid a giant Trinidad shot for twelve rounds? Doubt it.

Palomino would shrug off Pacquiao’s power and break him down with body shots in my opinion. No WAY Pacquiao stops Palomino. That guy was as tough as they come.

Cuevas is perhaps the 2nd biggest Welterweight puncher next to Thomas Hearns. Nuff said.

A prime Benitez was absolutely masterful. I think he’d box Manny’s ears off.

by Areglado on Oct 1, 2009 1:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jesus Christ, now we’re picking Pacquiao over Sugar Ray Robinson at 147? Cuevas and Trinidad would’ve caved his face in at some point too. Tito was nasty at welter. Pacquiao-Benitez would’ve been pretty awesome.

Bad Left Hook
"Well Howie, I think I'm going to stay outside and outjab him." -- Tex Cobb telling Howard Cosell how he would approach Larry Holmes

by SC on Oct 1, 2009 6:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ashamed to say i have no idea who napoles, gavilan, cuevas, or palomino are

now requesting a list of all of those dudes’ most entertaining bouts

The Dude Abides

by battle axe of doom on Oct 1, 2009 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duran-Palomino 1979 (Duran UD – I loved this fight)

Duran-Cuevas 1983 (Duran TKO 4)

Cuevas-Hearns 1980 (Hearns TKO 2)

Cuevas-Harold Weston (Cuevas TKO 9)

Jose Napoles-Curtis Cokes I and II 1969

Jose Napoles-Billy Backus 1970

Good luck finding clips of Gavilan. There’s stuff on youtube vs Olson and Graham in black and white, of course.

by Areglado on Oct 1, 2009 1:58 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

so gavilan is super old school. thanks for the list dude, rec’d

The Dude Abides

by battle axe of doom on Oct 1, 2009 8:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re welcome.

Yes, Gavilan is super old school. He fought Ray Robinson twice, and didn’t too badly either.

Hearns-Cuevas was just a shootout. The winner was gonna be the first guy who landed big. It was Tommy.

Duran’s my favorite, so it’s his fights with Palomino and Cuevas that I remember best. Be sure to watch the Palomino one. It’s a showcase for a) How tough Carlos was, and b) Just how great Roberto was. Duran-Cuevas, well, Cuevas just wasn’t himself anymore and Duran had his way with him — but you asked for “entertaining” and I thought it was.

by Areglado on Oct 2, 2009 2:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i caught a kid gavilan fight on espn classic not that long ago

by JohnUtah on Oct 2, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

master of the bolo punch

by JohnUtah on Oct 2, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah this might sound awful, but with these “old” dudes i can be f’d watching something like Leanard-Duran II/III.

so far i’ve been able to track down duran-palomino, and hearns-ceuvas. i need my 20 posts on unifiedchamp before i can browse for videos there, so i might be able to get the rest. thanks again duderino.

The Dude Abides

by battle axe of doom on Oct 2, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pacquiao knocking out Cotto

Mayweather hasn’t even shown a remote desire to fight Cotto.

But if you want me to explain, here’s one: Pacquiao is fighting a legit top welterweight. Can that even be said of Mayweather? So if he knocks him out, there you go…

by Fj-3 on Sep 30, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

been saying it all along and now i have freddie the non-joke coach roach to back me up

pacquiao via evisceration 6th round

The Dude Abides

by battle axe of doom on Sep 30, 2009 8:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Time to place your money

On whatever Roachstradamus calls as the finish.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Sep 30, 2009 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on the Weigh-in

If Pac comes in at 143 and Cotto at 147 then if the pacman knocks him out, impressive as all get out. Cotto comes in 144 and pac 144 with Cotto looking drained and drinking 9 sports drinks after the weigh-in, not so impressive. If Cotto comes in big and takes the early rounds to punish pacman to the body, I think he has a chance. If he is head-hunting all night, I like the pacman.

by waldo47 on Oct 1, 2009 12:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

TKO Cotto on cuts? Maybe. KTFO Cotto or even score a KD? Doubtful.

Up and coming middleweight Shawn Porter, who has been sparring with Pacman this camp, was recently quoted as saying he is not so much impressed with Pacman’s power as much as he is by his speed. If Pacman even knocks down Cotto I will be speechless. I don’t see it happening honestly. Cotto withstood Margacheato’s plaster bomb assault for 11 rounds and still never actually got knocked down. OTOH, Porter is a middleweight, Cotto is only a welter, so maybe that has to be taken into account when evaluating Porter’s assessment.

If Cotto comes in at 147, he’ll pay a $2 million penalty ($1 million per pound over the agreed upon catchweight of 145). Cotto weighed in against Clottey at 146. He should make 145 without too much trouble. Losing 1 extra pound probably amounts to at most one extra day of running/drying out.

by vvps on Oct 1, 2009 5:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Bad Left Hook, covering boxing 365 days a year.
Start posting on Bad Left Hook »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.


Managers

9018_185776360922_747385922_4256197_5272137_n_small SC

Editors

Simpson_small Brickhaus

Boxing_icon_small Matt Miller