Hopkins-Jones II won't go away
Rick Reeno of BoxingScene.com reports that the thought to be dead rematch between Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones Jr. isn't quite as lifeless as we all might wish. Richard Schaefer told the site that Hopkins still feels there's unfinished business, and referenced the Jones protest of Danny Green's handwraps after his first round TKO loss to Green on December 2.
"I've had numerous conversations with Bernard and there is still that unfinished business. Roy and Bernard have a deep dislike for each other. Jones filed a protest over the handwraps. I read the complaint and it's pretty interesting. That is a possibility," Schaefer told BoxingScene.com.
What they're attempting to do is excuse Jones' loss to Green with Jones' hard-to-swallow wraps protest, and wait just long enough that you forget that Roy Jones just got run over by a pretty good fighter, so that they can set up a boring rematch between two old men, something the public seemed OK with, I thought, when they first brought it up last year. But after Jones lost to Green, it seemed everybody went, "Well, that's that."
Of course, you might still desire Hopkins-Jones, and I guess so long as we stop believing Hopkins is one of the best light heavyweights in the world, I'm fairly OK with it, too. It's an old grudge, there's history in and out of the ring between them, and they likely still want a piece of each other just as bad as they did in November. Its appeal to the public is another story, especially considering the egos of these guys, and the fact that they'll think it's a pay-per-view fight, which might also be necessitated if HBO has no interest in overpaying for a couple of guys in their 40s to settle a score most people aren't that invested in anymore.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
I'd pay for it
I want to see Bernard pad his record and keep getting paid….not a better way to do it right now that this fight
Bruce Seldon > Ali
by rjhabeeb on Jan 11, 2010 2:27 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't
And I’ve paid for some real crappy fights over the past few years.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
by Brickhaus on Jan 11, 2010 8:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if you dont than how will I know who wins?
Bruce Seldon > Ali
by rjhabeeb on Jan 11, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I let Scott pay for this one
snickers
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
by Brickhaus on Jan 11, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bernard isn’t starving. He is a salaried GBP employee, and earns a lot of money just standing next to people on press tours, like a cardboard cutout of himself.
As for wanting to see Hopkins “pad his record,” I don’t get that at all. Why would I want to see anyone pad their record, let alone a living great who can still compete at the top level? More importantly, why would I want to pay to see it?
"This fight'll be the nastiest thing you'll ever see. I been sober for six weeks, and that makes me vicious."
-- Randall 'Tex' Cobb
by jrok on Jan 11, 2010 9:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
pad his record
Sarcasm maybe? It’s hard to tell on this interweb thing.
"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on Jan 11, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah my post was an attempt at sarcasm…..i should really think of a different way to say it
In reality I honestly dont mind the fight…..
fighting RJJ again is something Bernard really want to do get the W to say he avenged (sp?) his biggest L (in his mind at least) and make himself some decent money doing it
Bruce Seldon > Ali
by rjhabeeb on Jan 11, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ridiculous
It seems fine these days to besmirch a fighter’s reputation without a shred of evidence, just to advance your own interests.
Don’t want to accept you lost? Accuse a fighter of loading his gloves. Want to gain a psychological edge? Accuse a fighter of taking steroids.
It stinks to high heaven, yet so many – without demanding a shred of evidence – are willing to latch onto these types of slander.
by Falstaff on Jan 11, 2010 5:17 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is a fight that would be great in an undercard
but since boxing doesn’t work that way…… :(
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on Jan 11, 2010 9:02 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah. I wouldn’t mind this so much if it worked like UFC works, where this could be a special feature, or even headline a “smaller” show where you get lots of action-packed stuff on the undercard. But if this goes through we’ll wind up with Hopkins-Jones, BJ Flores-some bum, Danny Jacobs-journeyman, and then maybe a Daud Yordan fight or something.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by SC on Jan 11, 2010 9:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
bernard was always as shrewd and smart a businessman as they come, but his i just dont get at all. if the fights on versus and in philly or ac then ok i can see that but if he is thinking of doing ppv in vegas or anywhere actually, hes really lost his damn mind.
"Newspapermen ask dumb questions. They look up at the sun and ask if it is shining."
-Sonny Liston
@mikefareri on twitter.
by sonofapsycho on Jan 11, 2010 11:01 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
2010 is shaping out to be the mirror opposite of 2009 in awesomeness.
The year boxing crawled back into its cave of bullshit and bad fights…
(Sorry, I’m feeling more than a little cynical this morning.)
Boxing writer: "Iran, what are you going to do when you retire?"
Iran Barkley: "Rob your house"
by Matt Miller on Jan 11, 2010 1:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 











