Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

If you were Nazim Richardson...

So now it isn't Freddie Roach who is faced with the task of helping his fighter overcome the brilliance of Floyd Mayweather, it's Nazim Richardson, another superb and highly regarded trainer. I don't doubt that he and Mosley are going to come out with some very strong tactics to try to topple Mayweather but I'm really not sure what they will be. However as with Manny Pacquiao I do think there are some things Mosley would do well to remember if he wants to win this fight.

Work the body- Perhaps this seems obvious but I don't think that the importance of this can be too overstated. The only person to ever really bother Mayweather was Castillo and he went to the body like mad. Mosley is clearly a very different boxer from castillo but ever since his days at lightweight he has shown that he can body punch well enough to change the outcome of the fight, with a boxer as hard to hit cleanly as Floyd is, he will need this not just to wear him down but possibly also to be seen to be outworking Mayweather.

Establish the jab- Mosley never used to be much of a jabber, in his first fight with De La Hoya he barely threw any, but in his most recent matchup he showed a nice stiff jab that worked well in keeping Margarito at bay. When De La Hoya fought Mayweather he was most effective in the first half of the fight when he used his strong jab to try to keep Mayweather off balance as much as possible. If Mosley wants to be able to set up clean shots to the head then he needs to be very disciplined with those jabs and throw a considerably large amount of them.If he does this then Mayweather will be unsettled and easier to hit.

Adversity- This is a slightly vague area which has been mentioned a few times by posters on here; how will Mayweather react to actually being hit cleanly by a power shot? After all, times when this has happened have been few and far between and Mosley hits pretty hard and with very good accuracy. We can't tell but I wouldn't be totally surprised if Mayweather falls apart a bit when he gets hit flush a few times. What would happen next? Maybe he becomes even more defensive, maybe he actually gets into a war. I'm not saying that he will struggle mentally with adversity which he is unaccustomed to, but it is a possibility.

Speed- Just don't try to be faster than him, it isn't going to work. In your prime, maybe, but not now. It's not even that he's that much faster than you but his reactions still look great while yours have faded a bit and he was faster regardless of this. Mosley needs to go in with the intent of setting up powershots not trying the Judah approach of throwing Mayweather off by beating him to the punch. That was a good plan, but Mosley simply doesn't have the speed to do that.

As with last time these are just the basics which i think he should follow and as far as a prediction is concerned; I have no idea!

What are your thoughts and ideas concerning the tactics and outcome of the fight?

FanPosts are user-created content written by community members of Bad Left Hook, and are generally not the work of our editors. Please do not source FanPosts as the work of Bad Left Hook.

Comment 130 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

To play devil's advocate

Work the Body- Not sure how easy this will be since Floyd now uses the “philly shell” type of defense which seems to really effectively cover the body. He didn’t use that style defense in the Castillo fight and that fight might have been the reason he switched. You can tag the body, but you essentially have to aim for the elbows and hook, which will require you to be pretty far inside. While making this an inside fight might be a good idea, it kinda runs counter to Nazim’s whole “swim without getting wet” philosophy of getting in, scoring punches, and getting out.

Establish the Jab – Now this is Nazim’s wheelhouse. Shane needs to have a sharp, accurate jab. If both of those criteria are not met, Floyd will sidestep and counter over it. Controlling the action is good but giving Floyd more countering opportunities is bad. Double-edged sword.

Adversity – Something about Floyd seems to tell me that when faced with adversity he will become fairly repetitive….

Speed – Not fast enough to beat him to the punch but at least on the level of Floyd, which is what matters. If Mosley can have awkward moves coming into the body of Floyd, he has a good chance, but the speed of Floyd makes this really difficult.

My gameplan would be essentially to have a bunch of plans and figure out which one will work after Round 1. In Round 1 I would tell my fighter to simply make Floyd come at him, don’t make one offensive move toward him. Make Floyd come from the right, left, throw punches on the run, and get a feel for the speed of Mayweather. From there see what he is doing badly and try to take advantage of it. Part of me thinks that offensive Floyd really isn’t all that good and that’s where the chinks in the armor are going to be.

by Waldo Rastel on Jan 31, 2010 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

Good point about the body

I’ll definitely need to rethink that.

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 1, 2010 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I think the De la Hoya plan but only done better and for more than a few rounds. Shane is bigger than Floyd and has the strength to push and bully Floyd around, get physical.

Pump that jab. Go for the shoulder and throw the right to the body. Maybe even faint the jab, step in and work the body, the faint will interupt the counter.

Out work him or make him work. Easier said than done.

Put Floyd out of his comfort zone, make him think and stop doing things on instinct. Even fight dirty and piss him off.

Come in with more than one plan. Change it up on Floyd, dont let him get used to one attack (in fighting). If something is working use it then mix it up then come back to it. Basicaly make Floyd think about what will happen not just react to it.

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up." - Ali

by sigidy on Jan 31, 2010 6:36 PM EST reply actions  

I agree with Sigidy.....

Rough-house tactics, body attack as it allows, pressure, pressure, pressure. Dictate the pace and direction of the fight and do not let Floyd get comfortable. All this is easy for me to say while sitting in front of a computer, but Shane has the talent and experience to pull this off.

As to someone’s question about Floyd being hit flush and how he’ll react, my answer is he won’t react well. I can see this one leaving Floyd looking like RJJ a’la Tarver and Johnson. We found out that once Roy got hit flush he couldn’t take it well. I wouldn’t be suprised to see Floyd in the same boat. These guys get by for so long on not being hit that once they do, it’s a foreign concept to them on how to deal with the result.

by SmittytheCutman on Feb 1, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

To not fight at all.
Work the body — Perhaps this seems obvious but I don’t think that the importance of this can be too overstated. The only person to ever really bother Mayweather was Castillo and he went to the body like mad. Mosley is clearly a very different boxer from castillo but ever since his days at lightweight he has shown that he can body punch well enough to change the outcome of the fight, with a boxer as hard to hit cleanly as Floyd is, he will need this not just to wear him down but possibly also to be seen to be outworking Mayweather.

a.) Mosley will not risk going to the body on Floyd due to the fact that Mosley’s problem to leave his head vulnerable due to his lack of head movement. He stands straight up when he fights and doesn’t follow through. For example: Cotto vs Mosley — everyone knew Cotto’s jaw was suspect. Mosley landed great shots on Cotto, yet Mosley knew Cotto’s ability to lay leather yet continued to slug with Cotto. I saw no intention of going to the body. I doubt Mosley will keep that up for twelve rounds under the brutality of Floyd’s straight right hand. I just can’t see it. End of story.

Adversity — This is a slightly vague area which has been mentioned a few times by posters on here; how will Mayweather react to actually being hit cleanly by a power shot? After all, times when this has happened have been few and far between and Mosley hits pretty hard and with very good accuracy. We can’t tell but I wouldn’t be totally surprised if Mayweather falls apart a bit when he gets hit flush a few times. What would happen next? Maybe he becomes even more defensive, maybe he actually gets into a war. I’m not saying that he will struggle mentally with adversity which he is unaccustomed to, but it is a possibility.

b.) You mean when he was beaten to the punch by Judah, pushed around and bullied by Castillo in their first fight, smothered for ten rounds against Hatton and caught a huge right by DeMarcus Corley? Oh wait, what about all those people who thought the bigger Corrales was bigger, stronger and enough to take Mayweather out or those who found the larger De La Hoya would out power the smaller Mayweather at 154, a weight he’s never even been to — that adversity? They all lost. Margo stood there and took Shane’s power — Margo’s gameplan = countering punches with his face. Luis Collazo is the best case of an overactive Boxer trying to do too much with limited Boxing ability; no where on the level of Floyd Mayweather. Mayorga managed to land shots on Shane until he was KO’d, I won’t even start on Vargas. Moving on…

Speed — Just don’t try to be faster than him, it isn’t going to work. In your prime, maybe, but not now. It’s not even that he’s that much faster than you but his reactions still look great while yours have faded a bit and he was faster regardless of this. Mosley needs to go in with the intent of setting up powershots not trying the Judah approach of throwing Mayweather off by beating him to the punch. That was a good plan, but Mosley simply doesn’t have the speed to do that.

c.) Floyd’s ability to counterpunch will nullify any form of speed Mosley attempts to present. I’ve said before in another post, Mosley’s biggest asset in this fight his is power. Mosley will look to be the slower man, even if he uses the jab and doubles it up, Floyd’s straight right is used just as well as his jab. Mosley’s inability to stray from being hit by right hand’s is what will keep him from instituting his gameplan. Mosley’s “power vs power” will not work out to his advantage here. He has to use every inch of that ring if he hopes on coming out of that fight victorious.

Establish the jab — Mosley never used to be much of a jabber, in his first fight with De La Hoya he barely threw any, but in his most recent matchup he showed a nice stiff jab that worked well in keeping Margarito at bay. When De La Hoya fought Mayweather he was most effective in the first half of the fight when he used his strong jab to try to keep Mayweather off balance as much as possible. If Mosley wants to be able to set up clean shots to the head then he needs to be very disciplined with those jabs and throw a considerably large amount of them.If he does this then Mayweather will be unsettled and easier to hit.

d.) Once again, Margarito just comes forward. A blind man with a trained jab could his Margarito 10 out of 10 times. In Floyd’s case, he will use the ring. Create distance and strike. Once Mayweather finds out that Mosley is ineffective in the pocket, it spell the end and create yet another one-sided affair. This fight will clearly show that even in his hey-day, Mosley could not contend with Mayweather. Age will certainly show here.

"I do no speak of the future. Your demise is already an inescapable fact of the past. " - Aizen

by Ryan Tical on Jan 31, 2010 6:55 PM EST reply actions  

Jesus Christ.

I just realized; you’re right. Floyd is invincible. He simply has no weaknesses at all. Thank you for making this obvious to us all.

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 1, 2010 11:24 AM EST up reply actions  

He's pretty damn near invincible.

That’s why he hasn’t lost.

Although detractors decry (MMA) as a brutal, bloody form of human cockfighting, aficionados know it is a brutal, bloody, totally fucking awesome form of human cockfighting. -The Onion

by The Kittitas Kid on Feb 2, 2010 11:22 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

And that's the only reason he hasn't lost?

Nothing at all to do with the fact that instead of doing what Sugar Ray Robinson would have done (you know, the Sugar Ray Robinson that Floyd has said he is a better fighter than?), and fight Cotto, Margarito, Williams, Mosley, Pacquaio, Clottey, et al, Floyd took the “Invincible” route to greatness and fought a blown up Hatton (while tag-teaming with Joe Cortezzzzzzzzzz), a blown up JMM, a past-it Oscar, an already exposed (I hate that word too, but hell, Carlos Baldomir beating you is what this term was invented for) Zab Judah, and Baldomir himself.

Fighting people who are either past it or blown up is one route to an undefeated record, I grant you. If he were in fact ‘invincible’, he would have been able to do everything he has against a better class of opposition, and we would possibly be talking about him as the greatest boxer of all time. Now we’ll never know just how good he is/was, because he has denied us the chance to see it.

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you suggesting that Floyd isn't a ridiculously naturally talented and skilled boxer?

Because if you are, I’m not going to waste my time with this anymore.

Although detractors decry (MMA) as a brutal, bloody form of human cockfighting, aficionados know it is a brutal, bloody, totally fucking awesome form of human cockfighting. -The Onion

by The Kittitas Kid on Feb 2, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

No

But he is saying that Mayweather’s standard of opposition does not supply an adequate measure of his ability due to its inadequacy.

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 2, 2010 1:34 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Logic Fail

Ridiculously Talented and Skilled != Invincible

by taco pal on Feb 2, 2010 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Never said he was invincible. Direct quote:

He’s pretty damn near invincible.

I find Floyd as enigmatic and frustrating as anybody, but I don’t know where all this knee-jerk hate comes from. If ever there was a guy born to box, it’s him. And as far as invincibility, I don’t think there’s anyone between 154 and 130 who has the style to beat him, with the possible exception of Paul Williams.

Do I wish he fought better opposition? Yes. But people forget that the reason we want him to fight better opposition is because he’s so fucking good. If you’re not going to bother to acknowledge that he’s amazingly skilled, then why get your panties in a bunch that he doesn’t fight the best? I’ve never fought Cotto/Margarito/Shane, but you don’t see anybody giving a shit about that.

Bitching that Floyd doesn’t fight the best while failing to acknowledge him as the most skilled fighter today is the true “logic fail.” Without the one, who gives a shit about the other?

Although detractors decry (MMA) as a brutal, bloody form of human cockfighting, aficionados know it is a brutal, bloody, totally fucking awesome form of human cockfighting. -The Onion

by The Kittitas Kid on Feb 2, 2010 2:52 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Calling all squad cars. Multiple straw man found beaten.

by taco pal on Feb 2, 2010 3:02 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

LOL

This is the funniest comment I’ve read on here for weeks!! I actually have people giving me funny looks in the library now…

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Thank you sir. (But dammit, I made a typo! Oh well.)

by taco pal on Feb 2, 2010 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Straw Man

Although detractors decry (MMA) as a brutal, bloody form of human cockfighting, aficionados know it is a brutal, bloody, totally fucking awesome form of human cockfighting. -The Onion

by The Kittitas Kid on Feb 2, 2010 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes that’s a funny line, which I like to use myself from time to time, but you do realize that that line doesn’t preclude the possibility that the person who doesn’t understand what the word means is you.

by taco pal on Feb 2, 2010 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I put a link in there for you at the top.

So that we can both reach greater understanding.

Although detractors decry (MMA) as a brutal, bloody form of human cockfighting, aficionados know it is a brutal, bloody, totally fucking awesome form of human cockfighting. -The Onion

by The Kittitas Kid on Feb 2, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I wish I knew how to do those fancy purple boxes.....

Ok, point by point;

Floyd is, indeed, a fantastically skilled boxer. I have never denied this.

The reason people get their panties in a twist is because you cannot say you are the best at something without challenging the other ‘great’ fighters out there. JCC Jr can run over people who are over-matched, we expect something a bit more from someone saying they are better than Robinson.

I’m glad you wish he’d fought better opposition. We’re singing off the same hymn sheet here, I think, but looking at the words from different angles.

I have never failed to acknowledge Floyd is amazingly skilled. For the record, I blame him totally and without reservation for the Pacquaio fight not coming off, but had the fight been made,I firmly believe he would have won. Probably inside the distance too.

A question for you, based on your last few sentences;
How do we know he is the most skilled fighter in the sport today if he never fights anyone who can provide a challenge?

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

How do we know he is the most skilled fighter in the sport today if he never fights anyone who can provide a challenge?

I don’t know if he’s the best fighter on the planet today because he hasn’t fought the best. I argue that he’s the most skilled fighter on the planet today because of the combination of offensive and defensive skillsets I’ve seen him put on display in training and in fights.

Best doesn’t necessarily equal most skilled. Things like conditioning and determination come into play. For my money, nobody has a superior all-around skillset when compared to Floyd.

Although detractors decry (MMA) as a brutal, bloody form of human cockfighting, aficionados know it is a brutal, bloody, totally fucking awesome form of human cockfighting. -The Onion

by The Kittitas Kid on Feb 2, 2010 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

But by that logic, he's boxing's Jeremy Lynch.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytU1O7ZeNCA

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I wish I knew how to do those fancy purple boxes…..

Watch as I ironically mock your inability to create fancy purple boxes.

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 2, 2010 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve never fought Cotto/Margarito/Shane, but you don’t see anybody giving a shit about that.

That’s because no body thinks you can beat them and that you don’t walk around proclaiming yourself to be all sorts of wonderful things. And yes I do think Floyd is really, really good… Drunken cutman = not hateful.

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 2, 2010 5:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m sorry, did someone just make reference to the “brutality” of Floyd Mayweather’s right hand?

I recognize that Floyd’s right is highly effective and technically sound, but “brutality”? Really?

by taco pal on Feb 1, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

lol @ "brutality".

Floyd’s right isn’t even devastating. He’s an incredible counter-puncher but Shane’s been hit much harder by other fighters.

by SmittytheCutman on Feb 1, 2010 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Firstly spare me your sarcasm

You mean when he was beaten to the punch by Judah

A few times in the first three rounds and basically all Mayweather had to do was change his defensive stance which threw Judah off as he is is very poor at adapting and struggled from then on. This isn’t really overcoming adversity in my eyes seeing as Judah didn’t pose big problems because he wasn’t able to beat Floyd to the punch for long and is not very powerful.

pushed around and bullied by Castillo in their first fight

My point is that this as a long time ago and since then he hasn’t really had to face the kind of difficulties which Mosley will pose.

smothered for ten rounds against Hatton

Eh?

caught a huge right by DeMarcus Corley

Fair enough.

what about all those people who thought the bigger Corrales was bigger, stronger and enough to take Mayweather out

Indeed, what about them? Corrales turned out to be easy for Maywetaher to dispatch,tkaing the fight was gutsy but in the actual fight he certianly didn’t put Maywetaher in any kind of difficulties which prove that Floyd can handle tough situations.

I think our difference of opinion comes from two very seperate ideas of what adversity is; I see it as needing to overcome a severly negative situation in the ring. Think Corrales getting up to KO Castillo, or Gatti taking 8 million punches and fighting on.
All I said was that I’m not sure Mayweather has the mental toughness to deal with that sort of thing because it’s been so long since he was in a close, tough fight. I didn’t say it was likely or probable or that Mayweather wasn’t a great boxer.

I would answer the rest of your points but I am very tired and have two dissertations to write for Monday so let’s just imagine that I typed loads of really smart and witty stuff and totally won the argument ^^.

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 1, 2010 12:11 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

lol

Rec’d

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 1, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I actually think Margarito is a good prototype to beat Floyd. Always coming forward, throwing 100 punches a round, a sort of controlled and skillfull brawling style and the Mayweather doesn’t like. The problem is getting to Floyd, he’s just so fast. He’s not powerful, Floyd, but he wears you down to the point where he will KO you. A faster Margarito-type fighter can beat Floyd. Problem is that fighter is Manny Pacquiao.

I’ll be rooting for Sugar Shane, but I can’t find a way he can win. Floyd is too good at everything. Shane doesn’t do well with slick fighters, look at Winky Wright.

by mason_beer on Jan 31, 2010 10:12 PM EST reply actions  

Two asides--

1) Going to the body, especially if Jr. is on the ropes, is still a good idea as hitting Floyd anywhere—arms, chest, shoulders—is better than not hitting him at all, and it garners “busy” points and a perception of control. Shane was a devastating body puncher as a lightweight; he’s forgone the art somewhat in recent years, but he still cracks to the body. Cotto getting on a bike after the 9th (?) round was a result of Shane’s body punches. 2) Floyd, to my mind, has shown that he is about as focused and determined as one could want a fighter to be: He took what he had to in the Castillo fight and then immediately fought a rematch; I believe it was the Hernadez fight where Floyd badly hurt his hand, dropped to the canvass, then made adjustments and dominated the fight; recall also the moment when Judah purposely hit Floyd low and then nailed him again: everyone was going crazy, except Floyd—who simply took up where he’d left off as if nothing had happened. The counter-point to that—if you wanted to make one—could be that one would expect a fighter to fire back heavily after the crap that Zab pulled. Some might think Floyd was exhibiting a little leeriness after being bullied. Again, this is playing devil’s advocate. Anyway, if you combine the possibility that Floyd is leery of rough handling and also take into account that instead of fighting the toughest men available during his WW reign, Floyd took easier bouts, then you might think that a certain softness may have developed over time. That thinking would lead me to want a strong, smart, and well schooled fighter like Shane to turn the fight into a very rough affair: Shove and lean on Floyd (Bareera with Hamed); in clinches, use elbows, shoulders, a little head to the face—maybe hurl Floyd out of a clinch or two, or even body-slam him (Floyd is deceptively strong, but I think Shane will have the edge). I might even advocate some well placed shots to the hips when the ref couldn’t see, or a Tito style below-the-belt game evener. As Mr. Ted Sares says, you get away with what you can while you can.

by Don From Prov on Feb 1, 2010 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

Fascinating. Sounds like a job for a miniaturized version of Bernard Hopkins.

Mosley isn’t very much like Hopkins, but they are friends and they share the same trainer. Maybe he’ll be studying up on those “veteran tactics” before the fight…

by taco pal on Feb 1, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

"Sounds like a job for a miniaturized version of Bernard Hopkins."

That would indeed be an amazing match-up, P4P…..

A peak, scaled down Hopkins vs a peak, scaled-up Floyd….. I’d pay a lot of money to watch that.

What an amazing stylistic clash that would be.

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 1, 2010 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

wake me when it's over.

I’d love to run a computer simulation of Rollerboy-Hopkins; I’d like to run it a thousand times. But watch it? I already watched it. It was called RJJr. v. Hopkins, they were miniaturized to the middleweight limit, and I think of it at night instead of taking Lunesta.

by El Destruyo on Feb 3, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I see your point.... and I even agree to an extent.

I would argue though that 1993 was not Hopkins’ peak, and that the older Hopkins gets, the nastier he gets.

I’d be interested to know what most people consider to be Hopkins’ ‘peak’… I’d find it difficult to pinpoint, because although he is no longer the physical specimen he was earlier in his career, he seems to find and display more knowledge, more ring-smarts, more technical skill, with each outing.

I suppose there would be a way of mathematically pinpointing it, which would involve the cross-over point between his decrease in physical atttributes and the increase in his smarts… nope, I still can’t do it.

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 4, 2010 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I remember a comment, (maybe from you?);

the comment being replied to said something like “when Hopkins was at his peak”, and the reply was “Hopkins isn’t at his peak any more? You think someone should tell him?”

That comment still echoes in my head.

I had a conversation today about Hopkins fighting the Ruiz/Haye winner. My mate was like, “But Hopkins can’t possibly win against Haye, can he?”

I responded, “No he can’t, but I might have a bet on him anyway…”

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 4, 2010 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think that was me, but I’ll take credit for it nonetheless as it was a good comment.

By the way, the Calzaghe-Hopkins fight all makes sense now. Clearly, Calzaghe rushed Hopkins into the ring before his time because he knew Hopkins was still learning his craft. If Joe had waited until now to fight him, Hop would beat his ass!

by taco pal on Feb 4, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

That was shockingly quick work!!

Especially as I got the quote wrong!! :)

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 4, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Very interesting ideas

I like your rough housing comments, could work but it’s likely that this fight will have a very good referee considering its importance. I can’t see someone like Bayless allowing rough tactics for long but even if they can only be employed early on they may unsettle Mayweather.

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 1, 2010 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Mayweather's answer could be to hide behind Joe Cortez.

Well, it worked in the Hatton fight, anyway. And I thought boxing was a contact sport…..

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 1, 2010 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Cortez had nothing to do with the outcome of that fight. Both the fighters fought a dirty, awkward fight, tying up and what not. When Cortez stepped in it was usually because the fighters had wrapped themselves up into weird pretzels that you normally don’t see in boxing, (i.e. both fighter with there elbows above their shoulders).

The only thing I can really say about it is that he should have warned Floyd about ducking down much sooner, and much more authoratively.

by tkeithwhite on Feb 1, 2010 7:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought his point deduction against Hatton was weak. Floyd lured Hatton into it like he was a wrestling heel. Still, you’re right that he probably didn’t have a huge impact on the outcome of the fight.

by taco pal on Feb 1, 2010 8:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I disagree.

But I’ve been here on this issue before, and the fact that you disagree with me doesn’t make you wrong in my eyes, it just means you see things differently. I’m not going to try to ‘convert’ you…. :)

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think we’re that far apart. All I mean to say is that Mayweather would still have won even if the ref had done a better job.

by taco pal on Feb 2, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not sure on that.

I always said that Hatton had to win the fight by wearing Floyd down early, and hurting him before Hatton ran out of steam a bit in the mid-rounds. If the figbht made it to round 6 without Floyd being in trouble, roughed up or hurt, then Hatton had no chance.

I know this isn’t a popular opinion on here, but I seriously think that Cortez’s attempts to make this a jab-fest for the first 5 rounds had a seriously detrimental effect on Hatton’s chances in the fight. Had he been able to fight on the inside for the first five, there was a chance that he could have slowed Floyd down for the later rounds, but Floyd was, thanks to Cortez’s intervention, still fresh as a daisy.

There, I know it won’t be popular, but it’s genuinely what I think.

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

You gotta be kidding me

I could of sworn that it was Mayweather’s fists that knocked Hatton out, but maybe Cortez tripped him or something.

by erod on Feb 2, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

If Shane can make Floyd think that he is not unbeatable, it is his fight to lose. I think if Floyd’s confidence takes a hit, he will be but off his game.

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up." - Ali

by sigidy on Feb 1, 2010 11:12 PM EST reply actions  

This is a good point.

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe not 'correct', but we'll only know that with hindsight. Still an interesting idea though.

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I think he lives off his confindence. He sits in the pocket and rolls shots off cause he knows he can do it well, if Shane some how landed shots that Mayweather isn’t used to getting hit with he might question himself, or tactic. He could change it up but it will still be a step back from his normal fighting style, that might be enough.

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up." - Ali

by sigidy on Feb 2, 2010 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmmm, I find myself agreeing with this comment. I think Shane would do himself a favor by getting under Floyd’s skin. Something along the lines of “I’m finally getting my hands on you, you little bitch.” or “You knew back in the day you couldn’t beat me, and you can’t beat me now.” or “The reason you had to become a ‘defensive specialist’ is that you can’t take any punishment. Poor chins run in the family.” Stuff like that. Of course, it just isn’t Shane’s style…

by Areglado on Feb 3, 2010 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know. Floyd seems supremely confident. For all his braggadocio and antics, Floyd always struck me as the type of fighter who would, even in a losing fight, keep trying to find ways to get back into it, fight to the end, and stay tough. I even think he’d be humble in defeat. (At first)

by tkeithwhite on Feb 2, 2010 12:20 AM EST reply actions  

You're kidding, right?

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Arguably his desire to keep his 0

May drive him to fight extra hard if he looks like he’s going to lose it.

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 2, 2010 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

No, I think there is genuinely more to Floyd than people think. I suspect that a loss could actually be one of the best things that happens to his legacy. I think the post-fight interview would open a lot of eyes.

by tkeithwhite on Feb 2, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I tend to agree with you here mostly because of how Floyd acts after a fight in the press conference. After all the BS of the pre-fight, “nice Floyd” always comes out after the fight (barring the Mosley incident) and he is always complimentary of his opponent and the opponent’s fans. Its like there is a switch, and the “a-hole Floyd” is part of his pre-fight training or something. Also why does every thread that tangentially has to do with Floyd, breakdown to simply talking about Floyd?

by Waldo Rastel on Feb 2, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

One note:

Those post-fight pressers have always come after a win. If he loses a close fight, I will be shocked if he does anything but whine.

I suppose I'm cast as the darkness, because I comprehended their light not at all; at least not in the way they wanted me to.

by Pops Daniels on Feb 2, 2010 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

He's readily admitted to being a-hole Floyd on purpose

He’s said it many times that he does that to sell tickets. It appears to work very well.

by erod on Feb 2, 2010 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

He has an a-hole TV persona which is just for show. This doesn’t mean his real self isn’t also partly a-hole, albeit in a different way than his TV persona.

by taco pal on Feb 2, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally I think he’s a little bit a-hole (there’s truth in every act) and a little bit nice. But on the other hand, who isn’t?

by Waldo Rastel on Feb 2, 2010 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Could be...

…but I just think it’s kind of silly for people to guess what Floyd will act like if he loses based on a persona he readily admits to fabricating for the TV cameras.

by erod on Feb 2, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair....

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 2, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I suspect that a loss could actually be one of the best things that happens to his legacy

I totally agree.

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 2, 2010 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Very true--

and what I believe would happen, but it could also lead him into uncomfortable waters.

by Don From Prov on Feb 3, 2010 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

At first yea he will be humble. Roy Jones was humble after getting KOed in the first round to Danny Green but shortly after tried to say he had illegal hand wraps.

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up." - Ali

by sigidy on Feb 2, 2010 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

The difference there is, if Floyd gets beat he will have been beaten by the better man. Something he will know in his heart. Roy Jones did not get beat by the better man, he got beat by his own faded abilities.

by tkeithwhite on Feb 2, 2010 7:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Pride does have a way of getting in the way of sensible thinking, and we all know the ego’s around boxing. Floyd loves his 0. He comments on other fighters having lost so many times and to who etc. Its his motivation to keep that clean record or at least a very big part of it.

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up." - Ali

by sigidy on Feb 2, 2010 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Yet he didn’t blame faded abilities, he took weeks to concoct an asinine story about illegal hand wraps.

Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."

by Scott Christ on Feb 3, 2010 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

To be fair

He probably just came up with something after Nard called him back and said he still wants to fight.

I honestly hope that show bombs, and I hope they don’t put any must-see fights on the undercard so I don’t feel compelled to buy it. Maybe if it does horrible, they’ll both finally retire.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Feb 3, 2010 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

At the present moment; there is no "better man". Mosley is not that man.

The only person I believe that could defeat Mayweather is Father Time. Mosley presents great challenges, just not enough that would disrupt Mayweather’s ability to win. I’ve been in thousands of conversations regarding Mayweather’s opposition over the past years. From Castillo to Hatton — all say the same thing; all choose the “other guy” over Mayweather. Which they have a right to, I’m not knocking them for that. However, if Floyd continues to win and defeats opponents that others find will, again, disrupt Mayweather’s ability to fight. I don’t see how Shane is any different.

Once Mayweather defeats Mosley, the excuses will come out: He hasn’t fought in 18 months; he was 38; the blood tests did him in; et cetera. After that, the masses of Mayweather-haters will continiously attempt to create another Boxer with the creative know-how to defeat Floyd Mayweather. Pacquiao is not that Boxer. Try again.

My prediction: Floyd Mayweather by lopsided UD

"I do no speak of the future. Your demise is already an inescapable fact of the past. " - Aizen

Floyd Mayweather, Jr. fan since 7/12/97 -- 40-0-0 (25 KOs)

by Ryan Tical on Feb 3, 2010 1:12 AM EST reply actions  

I don't agree with the tone

but I agree with the premise.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Feb 3, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm as tired as this talk.

Ryan, constructive criticism: start your own site and get off this one. I know you could spout the same thing daily about Mayweather, being as you do it several times a day here, and you might cultivate an audience who wants to hear it. Ask nicely and Floyd’ll appear on the podcast.

Like a lot of people (though I damn sure did not pick Hatton; I wish I had picked Castillo in the first May fight, though, because he, y’know, won it), I don’t consider Mayweather a boxing deity, particularly in that I don’t believe in them. But here are some open-ended questions to which I sincerely don’t have answers:

What if Mayweather-Mosley was happening about 9 years ago, when it should have happened?

What if De La Hoya hasn’t abandoned Roach’s strategy and the jab? (And some wonder why he burned through so many trainers…)

Could Mayweather have beat prime Cotto?

Can Mayweather beat Pacquiao?

Can Mayweather beat a legitimate welterweight in his prime? (I have more respect for Baldomir than some, but hey, we’re not praising Dawson for his Glen Johnson victories, are we?)

Would Mayweather have been a more daring fight-maker had Castillo gotten the decision? Hell, would I like him more?

These are, again, open questions. There’s the problem. Because they stay open, I’ve given up even grading Mayweather, entirely. He’s a fake and a golden god. All praise and hatred to Floyd.

by El Destruyo on Feb 3, 2010 4:51 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

ddddd

I hated every minute of training, but I said, ‘’Don’t quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.'’ (Bernard Hopkins)

by BrianBrock on Feb 3, 2010 9:20 AM EST reply actions  

sorry having computer issues re above post....

Given the recent news, I think that Nazim’s best tactic is simply to give Floyd whatever he wants to drag his ass into the ring. The main point from the top I agree with is adversity, I don’t think that Floyd will react well to that at all as he’s more a boxer than a fighter now.

Great post as usual DrunkenCutman, just caught up with it only now

I hated every minute of training, but I said, ‘’Don’t quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.'’ (Bernard Hopkins)

by BrianBrock on Feb 3, 2010 9:22 AM EST reply actions  

:-)

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 3, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, great analysis.

I agree with most, I don’t agree with all, but a fantastic, well thought out analysis anyway.

As for your “punching off-rhythm” part, I was writing something up on that recently, but I used Prince Naseem instead of Pacquiao as my chief exponent of the art. I felt that his inability to bounce on his toes (against Barrera) like he normally did effected this technique so clearly that I felt it was the defining factor that led to his loss. One small thing, but it made him easier to gauge, to time, and to predict, so Barrera’s counter-punching tactic that night worked a treat.

Pacquiao is another great example of it, though. :)

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 4, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Great observation about Naseem in the Barrera fight. And it sure didn’t help that Naseem had such poor defensive abilities. He thought he was slick. I never thought so.

Aaron Pryor was another example of this. Was never much of a fan of his though.

And Pacquiao, I used to hate his style so much. Just, ugly, ugly… But now, it seems Roach has managed to bring the best of what he’s taught him and the best of Pacquiao’s weird, natural style together and “voila!,” you got someone whose style just confuses the hell out of everybody. And with Pacquiao, I don’t know if there’s anything to “figure out,” you know? I have a feeling sometimes that Manny doesn’t even know what he’s going to throw until he’s mid-combination. Boxer-puncher skills with a natural brawler’s instinct. Yikes…frightening combination…

by Areglado on Feb 4, 2010 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Aaron Pryor was another example of this. Was never much of a fan of his though.

I was and am a huge fan of his, but Pryor wasn’t what I would call slick either. He ate lots of punches, he just walked through ’em and dished out more than he ate. Did he ever talk about being slick defensively?

I suppose I'm cast as the darkness, because I comprehended their light not at all; at least not in the way they wanted me to.

by Pops Daniels on Feb 4, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

My bad, my whole comment was poorly constructed. What I meant was Aaron was another guy who fought at an unusual rhythm, like Naseem and Pacquiao. Aaron did eat a lot of punches counting on his great chin and his volume punching. I’ll confess a bias here, as I was a huge Alexis fan. =)

by Areglado on Feb 4, 2010 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey, they became good friends later in life! Time heals all wounds.

by taco pal on Feb 4, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Tell that to Joe Frazier.....

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 4, 2010 3:58 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Ok, not all wounds…

by taco pal on Feb 4, 2010 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah. That’s really too bad. I remember seeing him and Muhammad sitting together that one year they had the NBA All-Star game in Philly. I was touched. But then Joe keeps on coming up with these really bitter statements that somehow make their way to the media. Just sad.

by Areglado on Feb 4, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll confess my bias as well.

I’m from Cincinnati. Pryor made me a boxing fan when I was young.

I suppose I'm cast as the darkness, because I comprehended their light not at all; at least not in the way they wanted me to.

by Pops Daniels on Feb 4, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow. Lots of confessing going on.

Remindsme of the confessional scene in South Park….

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 4, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

It was in the two-parter;

Pt.1- Do the Handicapped Go To Hell
Pt.2- Probably

Brilliant, where they open the confessional and Father Maxi is just grinning out at them… Can’t find it on youtube (mind you, there isn’t a lot of South Park stuff on youtube)

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 4, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd been waiting for this comment!

Excellent stuff!

"Honey i forgot to duck" - Jack Dempsey

by Drunken cutman on Feb 4, 2010 5:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Just discovered the fanpost two days ago! Would have commented sooner!

by Areglado on Feb 4, 2010 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Good stuff

Great in depth write-up man!

by erod on Feb 4, 2010 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Wow

Wonderful. It’s a rare treat when someone articulates everything that your mind’s eye sees and cannot express yourself. Plus the insight into the footwork and combinations is wonderfully informative. Thank you.

I suppose I'm cast as the darkness, because I comprehended their light not at all; at least not in the way they wanted me to.

by Pops Daniels on Feb 4, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree 100% with Floyd’s defence being about routine. If Shane were to throw a diffrent combo he will have to throw it fast enough to not give Floyd time to see it and still block. He reacts fast and if Mosley has to reset to throw the next shot Floyd will still pick it off. Shane could tire faster doing this but at least it wont be a fast pace fight. He will be able to dictate the pace in that way which could influence the judges

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up." - Ali

by sigidy on Feb 5, 2010 7:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Good work.

"If you sit there and watch a person take about an hour to tie his shoestrings, then you realize that whatever problems you got ain't that significant"
---Vernon Forrest 2006

by The Midnight Rambler on Feb 7, 2010 3:20 PM EST up reply actions  

He does have a mean streak. Some of his KO’s have been downright malefic. Mayorga was sent to Trashtalking Dreamland and some of his early KO’s were brutal. But what he did to Cheato really was assault and battery. Whew! Those rights were of the molar-rattling type. But I agree, he does have to let it all hang out and go after PBF. I don’t see that happening, though.

"If you sit there and watch a person take about an hour to tie his shoestrings, then you realize that whatever problems you got ain't that significant"
---Vernon Forrest 2006

by The Midnight Rambler on Feb 7, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Damn...Areglado...

I just received an education my friend!! Great post, and there are a lot of good tactics there, especially the combinations and the bullying. If you watch Floyd train in those 24/7 episodes, everything is a rhythm and timing is vital. Floyd memorizes which combos are coming and reacts to them; dipping, diving, dodging and ducking, all while preening for the camera. If Shane disrupts that rhythm by throwing unorthodox combinations he has a shot.

Again, excellent post!!

by SmittytheCutman on Feb 3, 2010 10:13 PM EST reply actions  

Aw, thanks for the compliment, Smitty. So you noticed that too, huh? About Floyd and the fancy mitt work? The reason he can do the whole “blind boxer” thing is that he’s got the patterns down. It’s a trick. There’s no magic there. Like so many things about his career, it’s smoke and mirrors. Shane and Nazim will have to try something new or use a combination of things that have worked for other Floyd opponents. It’s got to be the right mix of things, and they’re gonna have to come up with an alternate strategy too, because Floyd is one of the best “adjusters” in the game.

by Areglado on Feb 3, 2010 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

This Is Why BLH Kicks Arse

Brilliant posts Areglado and Don From Prov . Great great breakdown Areglado . This is the sort of stuff that makes BLH the best boxing site on the net by a frigging mile . I still favour Floyd unfortunately but like you fellas I give Shane a good chance . Shame it wasnt 5 years ago . Cheers Blokes.

by JC40 on Feb 4, 2010 1:28 AM EST reply actions  

Thanks, man. Tim Starks’ Queensbury Rules features some solid writing too. Unfortunately, he’s often flooded by comments from ignorant, close-minded, even racist people. I don’t know why it is the Floyd and Pac nuthuggers seem to converge on that site and give him a hard time. Tim handles it pretty well though.

by Areglado on Feb 4, 2010 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

The southpaw comment Floyd senior supposedly made doesnt surprise me at all . Floyd looked like a different fighter against Corley and Judah .

by JC40 on Feb 4, 2010 1:29 AM EST reply actions  

Yes, but credit to Floyd for adjusting and finding a way to win. Personally I loved the adjustment he made on Judah. Just brilliant.

by Areglado on Feb 4, 2010 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm starting to look forward to these

breakdowns by Areglado as much as anything on the site. It’s almost like Kenny Weldon has joined us, but a Kenny Weldon who’s morphed into a communicative and more articulate (no offense meant to Mr. Weldon!) person. It’s already been said, but those are excellent thoughts on Floyd as a rhythm and “anticipation” fighter: Turning an opponent’s strengths into vulnerabilities is what great tacticians do, and taking Floyd’s intelligence and using it against him falls into that category. I don’t know, and won’t ask, what you do Areglado, but you sure as hell have an eye—and stop to digest and understand what you see. I’m appreciative that the Drunken Cutman posted this thread and that I got to read some very insightful words.

by Don From Prov on Feb 4, 2010 10:50 AM EST reply actions  

Kenny Weldon! He’s got awesome, awesome stuff. He’s got great stuff on what he calls “reaction” punches —when you block and punch with the same hand.

by Areglado on Feb 4, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Juan Urango can't even do that in the same ROUND

let alone the same movement…..

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 4, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

If I were Mosley’s trainer, I would not do very much except perhaps some fine-tunning on what SSM does not do so well. And there is little of that. I would concentrate on what PBF does rather than what SSM does and focus on that. The thing is, you have to hope that SSM has not grown too old. Which one will show up? The one who slaughtered Cheato or the one who looked a bit lethargic against Mayorga until he lowered the boom in the last round.

For me, this is no longer a perfect storm fight. More like an imperfect storm in which you have a fully rested PBF fighting a guy who has been in a lot of wars and who could grow old overnight. I see PBF winning it handily. But I will do an analysis later.

Interestingly, a few years back, I did one for ESB called the “Perfect Storm” and it garnered a monster number of posts. Not because it was paricularly well done but because it was done during a time when SSM really looked like he could do some damage to PBF who was hated or loved depending on the poster.

"If you sit there and watch a person take about an hour to tie his shoestrings, then you realize that whatever problems you got ain't that significant"
---Vernon Forrest 2006

by The Midnight Rambler on Feb 7, 2010 3:30 PM EST reply actions  

If I were brother Nazim..

I’d have Shane spar with Bernard , quality sessions with the elusive Ex would sharpen Mosley’s timing and teach him the finer points of old school rough-housing (key against Floyd IMO).

Floyd will be expecting those stoccatto jabs Shane likes to throw, I’d have Shane work on stepping in with a shotgun jab aimed at the chest, then have him mix up some fast 4 punch combos, alternating the heat. Don’t load up on every shot , let your speed do it’s thing. Show him something new each round, switch it up, keep him guessing. Throw the uppercut at the end of a combo, Floyd likes to dip low, make him pay. Every time he punches, fire back, catch him mid flight.

If you walk Floyd down he’ll slip and slide all night, standing in front of him might be risky but this won’t be won playing it safe. Sell the feint, read his reaction, get off first, make him pay. Floyd’s toughness might be under-rated as it’s rarely called upon, so call upon it, make it ugly.

Oh and if I were Nazim, I’d have a sit down with Areglado and Prov. Cheers Drunken Cutman, Ted, JC40. Good stuff.

"Anytime you go thirty rounds with a guy, try to kill each other, and have the utmost respect for each other, no one understands that, but guys who have been to war understand it." - Micky Ward on Arturo Gatti.

by Goatsnake on Feb 8, 2010 9:17 AM EST reply actions  

I’d love to have a sit down with Nazim and pick his brain. Bouie Fisher too. Between those two, there’s a treasure of boxing knowledge. Any surprise Hopkins fights the way he does?

Incidentally, anyone else here think Bernard would have given Marvelous Marvin all he could handle? I love me some Hagler, but I gotta say, I feel Hopkins’ height, reach, boxing IQ, and ahem “familiarity” with dirty tactics would have been a nightmare for Marvin. Not saying Hopkins would win, just saying it’d be more than competitive. It would be close.

by Areglado on Feb 9, 2010 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah that’s a great battle of skills, along with the atributes you mentioned, Bernard’s superior defensive skills, adaptability and ring generalship would have given Marvin trouble. I could see Hopkins winning that fight.

"Anytime you go thirty rounds with a guy, try to kill each other, and have the utmost respect for each other, no one understands that, but guys who have been to war understand it." - Micky Ward on Arturo Gatti.

by Goatsnake on Feb 10, 2010 6:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm a big Hopkins fan.

But Marvellous Marvin was a completely different animal. Hagler inside the distance for me.

Some people are acting like Pacquiao should be expected to have just gone, "Yeah sure, let’s do something I’ve never done before because your dad made some dumbass baseless comment."
(SC, 28/12/09; http://www.badlefthook.com/2009/12/27/1221143/mayweather-pacquiao-update-bob#comments)

by Chaos100 on Feb 11, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Hagler was my fave as a kid but I try and leave bias out of it . Marv was only 5 ft 9 and had great difficulty with top class technical boxers . Hops is probably the best exponent of the lead right hand head butt technique I’ve ever seen . Bernards legs , reach , intelligence ,size and technical ability would be too much for Hagler in my opinion . Watch the Geraldo , Leonard , Duran fights . Marvin was no A grade technician . He had weird stiff unorthodox footwork and often got too front on . Haglers resume is worse than Bernards at 160 . Unlike Hops he never tested the waters at 175 either. Hops gets savaged for beating up Oscar and Tito while Hagler gets props for losing to Leonard and having a tremendously difficult fight with an out of shape lightweight who was 4 years past his best ( Duran). With the advantage of hindsight I feel Hagler is overrated because he was HBOs first big name fighter . Cheers Blokes.

by JC40 on Feb 11, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep, pretty much exactly what I was going to say. Hagler wins ONLY through sheer toughness and activity. He doesn’t have the one-punch concussive power to take Bernard out quick. Lesser fighters, yes. But not someone as tough as Bernard. Marvin broke guys down. And that size difference is huge. In fact, it would be similar to when Hearns fought Marvin, although one can argue that Hopkins is a much smarter (and tougher) fighter than Tommy. The Executioner wouldn’t try to bomb Marvin out in the opening seconds the way Tommy did. He’d use Marvin’s aggression against him, and steal round after round. Hagler will always be one of my faves. But I say this is pretty much a 50/50 fight.

by Areglado on Feb 11, 2010 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Very good post Goatsnake....

I like the idea of sparring with BHop. Mosley is going to have to take his game to another level to win this fight. Become a junkyard dog and give Floyd everything AND the kitchen sink. I believe Mosley can win this fight but it’s going to take every fiber of talent and ability he has in his body.

by SmittytheCutman on Feb 8, 2010 6:25 PM EST reply actions  

Become a junkyard dog..

Yeah man, I like it.

"Anytime you go thirty rounds with a guy, try to kill each other, and have the utmost respect for each other, no one understands that, but guys who have been to war understand it." - Micky Ward on Arturo Gatti.

by Goatsnake on Feb 11, 2010 7:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Great stuff Goaty!

by JC40 on Feb 8, 2010 7:06 PM EST reply actions  

Very good Snake!!!!

"If you sit there and watch a person take about an hour to tie his shoestrings, then you realize that whatever problems you got ain't that significant"
---Vernon Forrest 2006

by The Midnight Rambler on Feb 8, 2010 8:55 PM EST reply actions  

Hey Ted, how do you think this “Sugar” would have done against Tommy Hearns? Think he could have gotten to him the way Leonard did in the first fight? Overall, Leonard’s the better fighter, yes. But styles make fights. Mosley, I feel, is the physically stronger of the two Sugars, and takes a helluva shot himself. Think the Hitman could have kept him off him? Or do you feel he’d have blasted him out?At 154, Tommy kills Mosley. At 147, not so sure.

by Areglado on Feb 9, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with “At 154, Tommy kills Mosley. At 147, not so sure.” Mosley has a style that could test Tommy.

"If you sit there and watch a person take about an hour to tie his shoestrings, then you realize that whatever problems you got ain't that significant"
---Vernon Forrest 2006

by The Midnight Rambler on Feb 11, 2010 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Muchas gracias amigos.

"Anytime you go thirty rounds with a guy, try to kill each other, and have the utmost respect for each other, no one understands that, but guys who have been to war understand it." - Micky Ward on Arturo Gatti.

by Goatsnake on Feb 11, 2010 7:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe

have him look at what the Saints defense did to Peyton Manning.

by Don From Prov on Feb 11, 2010 3:36 PM EST reply actions  

Brutal

"If you sit there and watch a person take about an hour to tie his shoestrings, then you realize that whatever problems you got ain't that significant"
---Vernon Forrest 2006

by The Midnight Rambler on Feb 11, 2010 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

JC40

Im being repetitive but the jab , the jab , the jab . First and best way to beat a counterpuncher who fights off the back foot .

by JC40 on Feb 11, 2010 5:11 PM EST reply actions  

Just An Opinion

Just putting my two cents worth in . Mosely is naturally more comfortable being an attacking fighter than Leonard but is shorter with less range , Arreglado . Hearns best weight was 154 in my opinion . From 147 – 154 he only lost one fight . The Leonard one. I think Tommys jab and hand speed would be too much for Shane . Shanes vulnerability to the right hand would be a worry too. Its all opinion and supposition but always fun to mull this shit over . Cheers blokes.

by JC40 on Feb 11, 2010 5:16 PM EST reply actions  

I can totally envision your scenario. And we all know that Hearns’ right hand was one of the best in the history of boxing, so yeah, I can imagine Hearns putting Shane to sleep at 147 too. No question at 154. It’s just that Tommy was never the physically strongest fighter at 147. Hell, Leonard bullied him (in the latter half of their first fight), and while I think Leonard’s strength is underrated at times, he’s not a “strong” welter (as opposed to, say, Carmen Basilio). Shane is a VERY strong welter in my opinion, but he doesn’t rely solely on his strength, which is why it’s not the first thing that stands out to people. But I found the way he manhandled perceived “superhuman” Margarito just amazing. If Tommy coudn’’t keep Shane at the end of the jab and land consistently with the right hand over the top, I think Shane would have had a good chance. The 147 version of Tommy would have been savaged on the inside. Ah, but getting past that cannon of a right hand, that would have been tricky…

by Areglado on Feb 11, 2010 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Great sceario--

Mosely/Hearns. I’d guess (big guess) that Shane, not being the mobile boxer that Leonard was (I don’t think his defense is a good/as slippery) wouldn’t have the right tools to handle Hearns, but if he survived and brought the fight inside as rounds went on. …

I’d love to see the lightweight version of Mosley face Duran or Arguello.

by Don From Prov on Feb 12, 2010 11:19 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools


Managing Editor

261987_10150306736470923_747385922_9782182_6616581_a_small Scott Christ

Editors & Moderators

Aki_hair_cropped_small Brickhaus

Boxing_icon_small Matt Miller

Profile_picture_small Brent Brookhouse

Ingo_small A.F.

Contributors

Belt_select_small Waldo Rastel

Chris_celletti_headshot_small Chris Celletti

Duran-dejesus_small Kory Kitchen

051_small Thomas Hill