Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Last Five Fights: Roy Jones Jr. and Bernard Hopkins

This ain't your older brother's Roy Jones Jr. (Photo by Al Bello / Getty Images)

With the 17 years in the making rematch between Roy Jones Jr. and Bernard Hopkins coming about in just four short days, let's look back at the last five fights for both fighters. This is going to be a fight week feature for all major fights from here on out, or if you don't want to consider this fight "major," all interesting enough fights. And, well, the last five fights feature for this one might be more relevant than just about any other.

We'll start with Roy.

Fight 1: Felix Trinidad (W-UD-12 / January 19, 2008)

Jones turned 39 three days before this fight at Madison Square Garden, paired up with former welterweight, junior middleweight and middleweight titlist Tito Trinidad, who turned 35 nine days before the bout, and hadn't fought in nearly three years. He had been essentially retired by Bernard Hopkins in 2001 (he fought once more in Puerto Rico in 2002, then returned in 2004), and then announced his retirement after being similarly embarrassed by Winky Wright in May 2005.

The event was a money grab. Don King infamously grossly overcharged for ringside seats to the event, which predictably he had trouble selling. But the show did quite well on pay-per-view, turning in 500,000 buys. This was pretty significant, and spoke to the brand power of both Trinidad and Jones, the latter of whom was still rebuilding his career after three straight losses to Antonio Tarver and Glen Johnson -- which included two ugly knockouts -- in 2004-05. After those fights, Jones picked off Prince Badi Ajamu and Anthony Hanshaw on small pay-per-view events.

This, of course, has been a recurring theme for Jones since the horrific loss to Johnson in '05. Lose to good fighters, rebuild some on easy marks, claim to be "back," lose to a good fighter again, rinse, repeat.

Jones did dominate Trinidad, and to this day I feel Roy sort of "carried" Tito through the 12 rounds. When he turned up the heat, he was obviously too big and strong for Trinidad, and even too fast. Roy at 39 was still fairly quick, especially compared to a bloated and rusty Trinidad. Hell, Roy at 41 still has speed. This fight was a physical mismatch. Jones, though old, is just a bigger man than Trinidad, and also was still in fighting shape. Trinidad was too little and clearly didn't carry 170 pounds well at all. Trinidad has not fought since.

Fight 2: Joe Calzaghe (L-UD-12 / November 8, 2008)

Hopkins had lost to Calzaghe earlier in 2008, and Joe returned to the States to pick the bones of another faded legend, though this time he wasn't doing it to a guy who was the Ring light heavyweight champion, who had been looking good in recent fights

Like in the Hopkins fight, Calzaghe was knocked down early. But while Hopkins made a go of it all night, Jones did not. Roy was clearly outclassed by Calzaghe, who at times even toyed with Roy. It didn't help Jones that his corner had absolutely no idea how to deal with a cut, as evidenced in that photo above and to your right. They did as bad a job on the cut as any corner could have. Roy was hung out to dry with that thing, not that it would have really made a difference.

Roy did fight bravely through the blood, and showed that he still had plenty of guts. But I also feel that, like the Trinidad fight but backwards, Calzaghe "carried" Roy a little bit. Joe's hands had become so fragile that he couldn't really punch with much authority by this point, but he could have abused the cut more than he did and get it stopped. He didn't. Instead, he cruised to a decision.

This fight is notable for a couple of things:

  1. Easily the worst HBO "24/7" in the history of the series;
  2. A firm confirmation that American audiences didn't give a hoot about Joe Calzaghe. The show did less than half of what HBO figured it would on PPV, and less than half of the Jones-Trinidad bout from earlier in the year (500K was their projection, reportedly). The show did 220,000 buys on PPV.

It was also the last time Calzaghe fought, but for different reasons than Trinidad.

Fight 3: Omar Sheika (W-TKO-5 / March 21, 2009)

The famed March Badness show (read the live thread if you have some time to kill). Sheika, a journeyman who had had a few big fights years back, had been out of the ring since September 2007. He had losses on his sheet to Calzaghe, Markus Beyer, Jeff Lacy, Scott Pemberton (twice), Eric Lucas, Thomas Tate, and an early career points loss to can Tony Booth. In other words, Sheika was old, rusty, and never really got over the hump in the first place.

So the fight was a sham, no better than the Ajamu fight or the Hanshaw fight, and I'd even throw the Trinidad fight in the same league except Trinidad is a big name. But whatever. Jones slapped Sheika around some, but couldn't discourage him in the slightest. After four rounds, I had Roy up 4-0, and then it was stopped in the fifth by referee Tommy Kimmons. It was an awful stoppage, as Sheika was looking right at Jones and still fighting. He wasn't hurt one bit and certainly wasn't in any real danger. He wasn't fighting very well, but it was a very early hook.

I ranked this fight as the eleventh-worst TV fight of 2009 in December. Overall it was a pretty wretched night of fights for both boxing and MMA.

Also noteworthy: though the stoppage was, in my view, incredibly premature, this was Jones' first win inside the distance since he'd beaten the tar out of Clinton Woods in 2002, which I consider to be the last of the "true" Roy Jones performances. (The heavyweight fight with John Ruiz was something of a novelty, and he was never the same after.)

Fight 4: Jeff Lacy (W-RTD-10 / August 15, 2009)

I got married on this day, so I couldn't be truly in the moment watching the fight, as I didn't watch it until the next afternoon when I got home. Jones looked very good, and earned some rave reviews. "He's back!" they said. I gladly noted that Jones had indeed looked sharp, but argued that he was certainly not back.

For starters, Lacy was not on the radar at 168 when Jermain Taylor dominated him out of that division, and he's just plain not good anymore. He's not a fringe contender, he's simply not any good. Lacy had come into this fight with this for recent output:

  • The terrible beating at Calzaghe's hands
  • Fights against Vitali Tsypko (MD-10), Peter Manfredo Jr. (UD-10) and Epi Mendoza (MD-10), all of which he won but you can argue well that he lost
  • A one-sided loss to Taylor
  • Another tight win against Otis Griffin (MD-10)

So who did Jones really beat? He beat a guy who at 32 was even more washed up than Roy Jones. Lacy hadn't looked good since beating Scott Pemberton before he was made to look like a scrub by Calzaghe. It had been years. This was not any better than Sheika or Trinidad.

Fight 5: Danny Green (L-TKO-1 / December 2, 2009)

I said right after this fight happened that I had the feeling they'd still do the rematch with Hopkins, and that I was OK with it. I still am. I didn't really have that much interest in it before, and Jones getting stopped by Green in one round dropped that even more, but hey, I'm still buying the fight.

I'll say this. Having watched the fight several times at this point, you can certainly argue that the punch that put Roy down was behind the head, and that the referee maybe stopped it a bit early. You can argue that. I don't think it was an early stoppage. Yeah, Roy wasn't being hit, but Roy Jones had been in pro boxing by this time for 20 years and seven months. He knows you have to punch back or risk being stopped. He initially made no excuses, then made some excuses about Green's handwraps (weeks later), and since has just kind of ignored that the fight ever happened.

So what are we looking at with Roy Jones Jr.'s last five? Three wins that I think are fairly meaningless, the second-worst beating of his career against Calzaghe, and a one-round stoppage loss against Danny Green. Jones is 41 years old now, frighteningly well past his best days, and really hasn't even been competitive against a top opponent since 2003.

The look back at Hopkins' last five is after the jump.

Star-divide

93631481_medium

(Photo by Nick Laham / Getty Images)

Bernard Hopkins has, by any measure, had a remarkably better last five fights than Roy Jones Jr., which is a plain fact. How much better, though?

Fight 1: Antonio Tarver (W-UD-12 / June 10, 2006)

Here's one thing worth pointing out immediately. You'll notice already that we have to go back to 2006 to trace Bernard's last five, while Roy's go back to just 2008. True, the quality in opposition for Roy and Bernard is way different, but fighting is fighting, and Bernard's done less of it. Honestly it probably doesn't mean anything at all, but it's there.

Hopkins, 41 at the time, was fresh off of back-to-back disputed losses to Jermain Taylor, who had ended his lengthy reign as middleweight champion of the world. So instead of dwelling on that too much, Hopkins decided to jump all the way up to 175 pounds and face the legit light heavyweight champion of the world.

And since there's no other way to describe it, let's put it the way it is: Bernard Hopkins kicked Antonio Tarver's ass from pillar to post that night. After the fight, Tarver even said that had Bernard "felt like it," he could have stopped him. Tarver would also later suspect that his water had been drugged, but that's less notable.

As an aside that has nothing to do with Hopkins, Tarver was on one hellacious run at this point. He had avenged his loss to Eric Harding, then fought Montell Griffin, then Roy twice, then Glen Johnson twice. He then fought Roy a third time, then fought Bernard Hopkins. God knows I've made my fan's feelings on Tarver clear over the last four years or so that we've had this site running, but the man didn't duck anybody. (Well, until Danny Green.)

This was a shocking result at the time. I know it's pretty recent historically, but boxing has indeed made some new fans, or brought some back, in the last three years or so. I think the level of awe that surrounded Hopkins' complete domination of Tarver might get lost in the annals of time. This was stunning. Hopkins was 41, jumping up two weight classes, and fighting a guy who had been about as good as anyone in recent years. And Bernard destroyed him. Tarver himself was 37 at the time, but kind of a young 37, with only 27 pro fights.

Fight 2: Winky Wright (W-UD-12 / July 21, 2007)

Bernard took over a year off before accepting a challenge from Wright, who agreed to fight Hopkins with a 170-pound catchweight. Wright was clearly not comfortable at the weight, and it doomed him. He looked heavy, and he was. Like Trinidad, 160 was sort of pushing it for Wright, and 170 was clearly way too much for him. He put up a pretty game fight, but Hopkins was just better, bigger and stronger, and in much better shape. Bernard had beaten Winky before they ever even got to the ring. He had the fight won while the two were in training camp, but nobody pays $50 for training camp reports of, "Actually, Winky looks kinda flabby at this weight, and I don't suspect he's going to have much of a chance to win."

Fight 3: Joe Calzaghe (L-SD-12 / April 19, 2008)

There are people that will swear Hopkins deserved this win. Judge Adalaide Byrd scored it 114-113 for Bernard. I just do not agree. I scored it 117-110 for Calzaghe on the first viewing, and then 116-111 on a second viewing. I was definitely on the high end of pro-Joe cards, but God help me, I just cannot see Bernard having won this fight, and I've tried to find rounds that I could score differently, just to argue with myself, which I like to do.

Calzaghe ran Hopkins ragged. Bernard is noted for his fanatical attention to conditioning, his work with Mackie Shilstone, and all that, but Calzaghe made him look his age for once. Jermain Taylor had similarly done this, but I thought the two Bernard-JT fights were exceptionally close, and thought this was obviously Calzaghe's win, and that he fully deserved the victory. He had Hopkins breathing heavy and going into the reserve tanks. He had Hopkins confused at times. He was just a better boxer on this night.

Would it have been the same if you put them prime-versus-prime at 168 pounds? I don't know. Calzaghe would always have been a tough style match for Bernard, but Bernard definitely ranks higher on my brain's silent "greatest of the era" list. I do know Calzaghe wouldn't have tired a younger Bernard as easily.

Fight 4: Kelly Pavlik (W-UD-12 / October 18, 2008)

A month before the Calzaghe-Jones PPV flopped, this one did, too. But one of those fights (Joe-Roy) is all but forgotten as anything more than Calzaghe's last fight and the idea that he took an easy name mark to the bank, while the other (this one) is remembered as yet another master class performance from an all-time great, once again just when no one thought he could do it again.

Look, Bernard Hopkins is 45 years old right now. He's going to fight Saturday at 45. He was 43 when he took on the 26-year-old, unbeaten (34-0, 30 KO) middleweight champion of the world in October 2008. And like the Tarver fight, there's no other way to put it. Bernard Hopkins kicked Kelly Pavlik's ass from pillar to post. He mauled him, gave him ten boxing lessons over the course of 36 minutes in the ring, and to a great degree, burst Pavlik's bubble. Kelly Pavlik is a real good fighter, but it's two years later almost and he still hasn't quite shaken this loss in the minds of the public.

Two things I'll never forget about this fight:

  1. Hopkins' goosebump-inducing staredown of press row after the fight;
  2. Hopkins literally giving Pavlik boxing advice after the fight. He wasn't cocky, he was telling Pavlik that he could be better than he already was if he worked harder.

Fight 5: Enrique Ornelas (W-UD-12 / December 2, 2009)

Hours after Jones was knocked out by Green, Hopkins casually beat former fringe middleweight contender Ornelas in Philadelphia. It wasn't much to get excited about, but it shook the ring rust after over a year off. About on par with Jones' win over Lacy, I'd say. Ornelas is a brave, tough fighter, but he's well below Hopkins' class and isn't a light heavyweight.

The key to Bernard's last five: never, ever count out Bernard Hopkins. Doubt him at your own peril (heaven knows I have), but never assume he can't do it.


Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good breakdowns.

So what are we looking at with Roy Jones Jr.‘s last five? Three wins that I think are fairly meaningless, the second-worst beating of his career against Calzaghe, and a one-round stoppage loss against Danny Green. Jones is 41 years old now, frighteningly well past his best days, and really hasn’t even been competitive against a top opponent since 2003.

The script was supposed to be : Roy would fly down to “Europe” they’d photograph him punching a white guy, and then everyone would forget about what Joe Calzaghe did to him. But that wouldn’t have happened anyway. I know Joe is a good fighter, but Calzaghe-Jones wasn’t just a good fighter beating up on a faded one. Roy Jones looked more shot up than Sonny Corleone in that ring. He needed to retire right then and there, take a bow and ride off into the sunset.

Hop will not carry this man. I believe he will look for a stoppage. Hopkins was obviously pressing hard and trying to stop Kelly Pavlik and couldn’t do it. But Kelly Pavlik was 26 years old and had never been kayoed. Hopkins was never a K.O. artist, and we won’t see any kind of knockout punch (or anything even close to an exciting fight – forget it). But I think when he sees up close just how old Roy really is, he is going to try to lay some leather and force the ref to stop this thing.

"Boxing is the only sport you can get your brain shook, your money took and your name in the undertaker book"
-- Joe Frazier

by jrok on Mar 30, 2010 10:08 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree.

The only thing is, Roy is still quicker than Bernard. I think Roy could evade Hopkins for prolonged periods, and could even steal this on points. SC made the comment months back that he though Jones’ style was nightmares for Hopkins back in the day, and that today that still holds true.

Personally I think Hopkins is a deserved favourite, I think Hopkins can still beat anyone in the division (Are ya listening, Dawson?!!), and I don’t think Roy can. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that barring a minor miracle on the same scale as a localised (into one yard) scale earthquake, or a lightning strike, I know Roy can’t win a fight with Chad, or with a few other guys in the division. However, while Roy still has full use of both arms and legs, I think his style is a difficult one for Nard to crack.

That said, if Roy’s chin has completely gone, then even Nard can hit him hard enough to stop him.

Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)

by Chaos100 on Mar 30, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good Breakdowns – I just don’t see Roy being that competitive against Hopkins after his recent losses – I would LMAO if Roy did win, but I just don’t see it happening. I think they will struggle to sell it. I agree with your sentiment about Hopkins win over Tarver win – was probably Hopkins best career win.

by BristolOne on Mar 30, 2010 5:27 PM EDT reply actions  

i don't like this

fight for roy at all i’ve been a fan of roy since he beat hopkins with a broke hand by the way but he’s old a different kind of old he was always the fastest and strongest so he didd’nt have to be technically sound but now age has taken that away and hopkins is a completely different story he is very technically sound that’s why his better than roy now and i see roy going to sleep again i just hope this is his last fight he is still one of the best ever to put on a pair of gloves

by tombomb on Mar 30, 2010 7:40 PM EDT reply actions  

This is a terrible fight for Roy

and one that I will watch the way the way one looks at a car accident; you know you shouldn’t but you can’t not do it. Bernard has so much to gain (in both revenge and legacy) that I believe he will not only try but will hurt and probably stop Roy. Roy on the other hand has so much more to lose; his senses first and foremost. He has no punch tolerance left whatsoever. He is a damaging blow or two from never being the RJJ that we had come to know as a broadcaster, let alone a fighter. His legacy is tarnished with each defeat. Although another one won’t make it any worse, it will make Him worse. And in the unlikely event that Roy somehow upsets Bernard, it is clear that he will see this as not only redemption from comments such as mine … but as a clear mandate to himself to keep on putting himself in Harm’s way. The only win for Roy and his fans is if he has decided already that regardless of the outcome on Saturday, it’s time to hang up his gloves.

by pakinpower on Mar 30, 2010 10:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Bernard has so much to gain (in both revenge and legacy)

Only in his own mind. Nobody is going to consider a win over Jones in 2010 anything that affects Bernard Hopkins’ legacy.

And I don’t think legacies really get tarnished. It is, after all, about what the fighter (or any athlete) was like at their best. But that’s just my view of it — I never felt Craig Biggio was somehow a worse player than he was simply because he held on too long chasing 3000 hits, for instance. He’s still one of the best second basemen to ever play baseball. Roy and Bernard are still two of the absolute best of their era, and two all-time greats, no matter what.

Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."

by Scott Christ on Mar 31, 2010 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bernard has so much to gain (in both revenge and legacy) 'that I believe he will not only try but will hurt and probably stop Roy'.

It was this second part of the sentence that I intended to highlight. You are absolutely right that it is only in his mind. But what is in Bernard’s mind, to him, has always been the most important if not the only important thing. And if his past in any indication, he will do his best to seal the Jones defeat by finishing Roy if he gets the chance. For Bernard, it would be a great way to cap a career and another key name to burnish his late record. For Roy..well frankly..I don’t see what Roy gets either way.

by pakinpower on Mar 31, 2010 12:34 AM EDT reply actions  

If Roy beats Bernard, it’s going to flat-out shock the boxing world. It’ll be another feather in his cap. For him, I think there is legacy to be gained. Of course that also scares me, because he’d probably try to fight Chad Dawson or something, and dumbass HBO would sign off on it, too.

Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."

by Scott Christ on Mar 31, 2010 1:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, I think we both agree that legacy is a ten letter word (subjective) that both men have already earned.

It’s their health that concerns me. They have given us so much, I wish they would leave the stage with some of their just rewards.

One of the rarely discussed issues/problems attendant the phenomenal strides in exercise physiology, diet and training (eg. Mackie Shilstone, Ariza, et al) accessible to dedicated athletes is that their bodies can conceivably achieve a capability to continue to perform at a level where their reflexes rarely can. Boxers in particular face a unique danger. The accumulative beating taken in the course of a career takes a significant toll in itself. Add to that the ego that drives/drove them and we have seen many examples of fighters looking at tape of the next generation and convincing themselves that they can beat what they see; that is, until the get in the ring and find otherwise.

You have amazing fighters like Manny squeezing every ounce of out of his body both in the gym and then in the ring … and at 31 years old he has accumulated a lot of mileage on his incredible ride. How much longer can even the hardest of workers bend before breaking. B-Hop is a phenomenon on the other end of the age spectrum. He has through the combined efforts of living right, training hard and great technique managed a late surge in career unlike few others.

Now the question, particularly for Bernard, is which night and which fight does he begin to get old right in front of our eyes.

by pakinpower on Mar 31, 2010 2:24 PM EDT reply actions  

DRMULLEN

Let us not forget a well past his prime Jones, had Calzaghe down hard in the first..I’m sure Joe would admit he was almost out. Just think what a peak jones would have done. That green fight was stopped way too soon..

by DRMULLEN2010 on Apr 1, 2010 9:07 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Reds_small
Ray Robinson And Cassius Clay, Together For The First Time
Buchanan
David Price and Seth Mitchell: How to Properly Develop a Heavyweight
Small
Sterioids in Boxing!!
Ali-frazier_small
Aaron Pryor vs Floyd Mayweather.
017_small
Adrien Broner - Real or Imitation
Small
Press Release: Top Rank purchases WBC
Buchanan
Is Boxing Dead?
Singleton04_small
It's Not if but When, they're fires stop burning
Reds_small
A Few Ballroom Bout Results
Tyson-bruno_small
Who do you want to see Cotto fight next?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

206480_10150226708710923_747385922_9037192_4017321_n_small Scott Christ

Editors & Moderators

Aki_hair_cropped_small Brickhaus

Boxing_icon_small Matt Miller

Profile_picture_small Brent Brookhouse

Ingo_small A.F.

Contributors

Henry_leeds_small Oli Goldstein

Chris_celletti_headshot_small Chris Celletti

Duran4-470x308_small Kory Kitchen

051_small Thomas Hill