We forgive everyone else, why not Antonio Margarito?
(Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images)
This is a FanPost promoted to the front page as a rebuttal (asked and received) for an article from last week.
While this post, frankly, does not agree with the viewpoints of myself or our other staff members, authors or moderators, alternate viewpoints are valued greatly on our site. We are also a community of fans first and foremost, and our readers are greatly encouraged to share civil arguments with us.
This situation, obviously, is one where many fans have extremely strong feelings. To this point, the stance on our front page has been harshly against the return of Antonio Margarito, and was entirely in favor of his banishment last year. But we intend to represent more than just ourselves, and if our coverage was entirely anti-Margarito, I would feel a bit less than complete in our handling of the situation.
To put it simply, we are not offering this as the view that our site has. This is, however, our community's interaction at its best. It is an argument on a controversial subject not given with inflammatory intent, but rather to be responded to itself, agreeable or not. We do not expect this article to be popular, but the author was kind enough to share it with us, and I have personally made the decision to front page it.
--Scott Christ, Managing Editor, Bad Left Hook
Saturday saw the return of Antonio Margarito after a lengthy 16 month layoff. The 'Tijuana Tornado' eased to a near shutout 10 round UD over the tough Roberto Garcia in front of a huge crowd at Aguacalientes.
Following his brutal knock out defeat at the hands of Shane Mosley last January, the boxing world was shocked as Nazeem Richardson discovered a pasty white substance on Margarito's hand wraps, later revealed to be 'Plaster of Paris'. Margarito and his trainer Javier Capetillo consequently received a minimum one year suspension for illegal wraps.
The whole debacle has brought Margarito's whole career into question and left his legacy disgraced. Many have called for him to be given a life ban and have refused to show forgiveness. His actions were inexcusable but a degree of perspective is required.
A number of boxing fans incorrectly compare Margarito and Capetillo's actions to those of Luis Resto and Panama Lewis which ended the career of welterweight prospect Billy Collins. While it is true that Resto's hand wraps were dipped in plaster, this was performed as an addition to the removal of two ounces of padding from Resto's gloves. It was for the latter offence that both Lewis and Resto were convicted and why the tragic fight lives in infamy. Some would have you believe that the actions of Luis Resto and Antonio Margarito are the same which is nigh on ridiculous.
Resto and Lewis have never been forgiven and many have also shown the same attitude towards Capetillo and Margarito. What interests me is the selective forgiveness of analysts and fans and how selectively they retain and use information.
Margarito intended to use 'Plaster of Paris' to gain a physical advantage and punch harder in the ring. His actions are no different from his opponent at the Staples Centre that night, Shane Mosley. PED's are as dangerous if not more so in having the potential to allow a boxer to inflict fatal injury, yet most fans offer their forgiveness to the likes of Shane Mosley, James Toney (twice), Fernando Vargas and Roy Jones.
Not only have these fighters been forgiven, but their sins have almost been forgotten by most. Their legacies and the legitimacy of their victories has never been called into question. These fighters will be future Hall of Famer's yet Margarito gets tarnished with an entirely different brush. How can anyone be a fan of any of the aforementioned fighters, and then so vehemently express their anger at Margarito?
Numerous analysts have concluded that Margarito doesn't deserve forgiveness due to his lack of remorse and his continued claim that he was unaware of what was contained within his hand wraps. In addition some have argued further that if he just apologised then maybe the boxing world can forgive him. But the same expectation has not been required of others. By nature an apology can only come with an admission, and how many fighters who have actively used PED's issued apologies and admitted outright to be seeking an advantage.
Victor Conte, the founder of BALCO claimed Mosley was aware he was using PED's, whilst Mosley claims he was unaware. Toney on his second offence claimed his water bottle had been tampered with. Fans and analysts choose to believe outlandish excuses by certain fighters and provide these fighters a pass, but do not extend the same privilege to Margarito. Mosley is a stand up guy for saying he didn't know he was on PED's whilst Margarito is a criminal, unworthy of forgiveness for stating he didn't know what was cased inside his hand wraps?
Similarly there has been no attempt to question the legitimacy of any victories achieved by Mosley, Toney, Vargas or Jones, whilst every attempt has been made to discredit every one of Margarito's achievements. One would have you believe that his only asset is his power. Every fight post Santos II has been questioned by fans and analysts alike.
The main fight in question is the 2008 FOTY contender war with Miguel Cotto. To attribute his victory over Cotto solely to 'Plaster of Paris' is absurd. Margarito has a truly granite chin and his ability to both withstand and land power shots enabled him to eventually overwhelm Cotto. Cotto landed an incredible 179 power shots, and Margarito just walked through them. The Mexican's conditioning and stamina have always placed him head and shoulders above most in the sport. He threw 987 punches against Cotto and holds the Compubox record of a crazy 1675 punches thrown against Joshua Clottey.
The naturally larger Margarito wore down Cotto by hounding him relentlessly, forcing Cotto to constantly move and eventually tire. What Margarito's detractors fail to acknowledge is he landed an astonishing 237 power punches. Whatever Cotto mustered, Margarito handled and continued the pressure forcing Cotto to wilt. Many a fighter with loaded gloves would not have been able to do what Margarito did to Cotto. Having the ability to land and take as many punches as Margarito did commands respect for his abilities. He fought an outstanding fight.
The suggestion is not that Margarito did not load his gloves before the Mosley bout. That will forever remain a mystery, just as it is unclear how long Shane Mosley and others used PED's. However in Margarito's case it is highly improbable that both opposition trainers and commissioners stood and watched Margarito's hands being wrapped, signed off on them being acceptable, and missed signs of a white substance every time.
Again things need to be put in perspective. If individuals were to exercise the same cynicism for other boxers as they have for Margarito then maybe a few more careers would be questioned. Fans and analysts should exercise more consistency in their judgements.
This is not a defence for Margarito. The actions of Margarito and Capetillo were deplorable but no more deplorable than the actions of other fighters who have been handed out less stringent punishments and been forgiven by the boxing public. Margarito does not deserve to have his whole career put under the microscope any more than other sinners. If he were to have been banned for life for his actions I would have no problem providing that those who have committed acts such as PED offences were dished out the same punishment. But we forgive other fighters, why not Margarito?
With or without loaded gloves Margarito is a fighter with a lot of ability and will be a tough contender for anyone providing he moves back down to welterweight. Prior to this incident he was one of the most feared boxers on the globe. He was a warrior who took on the best in Shane Mosley, Miguel Cotto, Paul Williams, Joshua Clottey and Daniel Santos. He has made his mistake, completed his suspension and has made his return albeit only in Mexico.
This incident shouldn't erase or cast doubt on his past. If rumours are true and he is being lined up as Manny Pacquiao's next opponent he has a perfect opportunity to create a new future. He can show us again how good a fighter he is, and put this incident behind him and maybe in time gain forgiveness from the boxing world.
FanPosts are user-created content written by community members of Bad Left Hook, and are generally not the work of our editors. Please do not source FanPosts as the work of Bad Left Hook.
163 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Seriously great article.
Doesn’t change my mind, but it certainly made me think.
I’m not positive that I could properly explain why, but plaster and PED’s are not equal offenses in my opinion.
It's my belief
That if you are a professional athlete, your body is your job. Athletes keep in shape to be competitive and train to win. They should be aware of what’s going on and in their bodies. The majority of them are. “I didn’t know” is an excuse that does not fly with me. They know. They’re all fully aware and the lot of them are all cheaters. As for the difference in PED’s and plaster, PED’s are a competitive advantage that does not win the fight or immediately place their opponent in serious danger. The plaster adds a lot of extra force behind the already vicious blows. PED’s give you an edge in stamina or getting into shape they aren’t like putting brass knuckles on. They’re more like putting extra wind in their sails. I like Mosley but I’m not buying his story, nor am I buying Margarito’s. I think Sugar’s wins against DLH are tainted and we’ll never know if he could have beat Oscar square. Margarito’s win against Cotto raises eyes in my book, and if he had gotten away with it against Shane he could have seriously hurt him or someone else. Shane took something that could help him win. Margarito put on something that could end or devastate another man’s life.
My name is Suh! How do you do?! Now You GONNA DIE!
Agreed. Taking steroids or anything similar may give you an advantage, but what Margarito did could kill someone. Even before this happened I saw many people baffled at the Cotto fight when he came out looking like someone in a hell raiser movie. Sure we don’t know, but seeing an undefeated guy turned into a bloody mess makes you wonder. I think those need to be seen as two different things and any form of cheating is dirty. But when you can take a man’s life from your choices, that is on another level. I don’t condone either.
People have died in the ring from shit like that and it should not be taken lightly. The boxing world is crooked enough without things like this. From the scummy promotors to the prima donnas, paid off judges or incompetent commission people, it’s a dirty business literally built on blood money. I do agree that some people get harsher treatment but it goes back to who’s running the show. If it came out that Floyd Mayweather had microchips in his calves, I’m sure they wouldn’t kick him out for good either. Money talks, especially when you sell tickets.
Also, look at the personalities of the 2. Margarito doesn’t speak english so how often do you see him in the camera charming the english speaking world? Mosley’s career is built on his calm demeanor outside the ring and being a nice guy. He’s easier to forgive in the eyes of some people.
I don’t have any personal hatred to the guy for doing it as he didn’t do anything to me, but I certainly have lost my respect for him. He’s a grown man and I don’t buy excuses. I’ve been around too long to believe that he couldn’t know what they were doing to his hands.
With things like this, you never know what goes on behind closed doors, but like any other industry some people have more power than others and I think that is why the punishment varies. Having a completely fair boxing industry doesn’t make much sense with the characters involved. Unless an offshoot was started by honest businessmen, which is a contradiction in terms, I don’t think we’ll ever see anything close to what could be considered a purely fair sport that is equal to all.
A promise is comfort to a fool.
Yeah. Bringing plaster into the ring is like bringing a bat into the ring. It’s always conceivable that you could be in the ring with a guy who naturally has the muscles that steroids could give him or naturally has the stamina EPO could give him, but the idea that he’s got solid rock for knuckles and can throw punches into your elbows with reckless abandon— there’s no PED for that. He tried to bring a bat into the ring and swing it at a guy.
by Arthur from Anaheim Calling on May 11, 2010 6:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Similarly there has been no attempt to question the legitimacy of any victories achieved by Mosley, Toney, Vargas or Jones
Yes there has. There is a fairly huge asterisk over one of Mosley’s wins over De La Hoya because of his PED usage.
Additionally, your comparison of PED usage to loading gloves seems flawed to me. The BALCO PEDs being used by Mosley were used to boost endurance and stamina, sure they allowed Mosley to hit as hard, for longer, but they didn’t boost the damaging effect of his punches beyond what it usually was.
In my mind I can’t forgive Margarito as I can’t get beyond the fact that he attempted to put Mosley’s life at risk. Anyone who walks into the ring is risking their health and life, this shouldn’t be made more dangerous through illegal handwrapping.
It damages the opponent, it damages the division, and it damages the sport. I see it as the greatest crime in boxing and I will not offer the hand of forgiveness to Maragrito.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
This is like forgiving Luis Resto and Panama Lewis. That won’t happen. And neither will forgiving Cheatarito.
Twitter: @FlyByKnite
I can see why he thinks that the cases are different
But the essence of the crime is still the same, and I find it easier to see why people won’t forgive him, than will.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 11, 2010 6:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Lewis/Resto are worse than Margarito. Margarito is worse than Mosley.
But Margarito is a lot closer to Lewis/Resto than he is to Mosley.
by taco pal on May 11, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Because they could not humble themselves
When they got caught to say, hey I fucked up.
"I guess I can’t do anything if you’re just irrational, but to point it out and move on."
- fundamentallysound
by J Theory on May 11, 2010 7:25 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I disagree with many of the posters here
I want to preface my comments by saying that I don’t necessarily believe that Margarito deserves to be, or doesn’t deserve to be pardoned. I don’t believe that what he did was automatically better or worse than what Shane Mosely did before the second DLH fight. I just want to rebut what seems to be the general sentiment among the posters.
It seems like everyone in this thread is saying that PED’s aren’t that big of a deal. “PED’s are a competitive advantage that does not win the fight or immediately place their opponent in serious danger”. “It’s always conceivable that you could be in the ring with a guy who naturally has the muscles that steroids could give him or naturally has the stamina EPO could give him”. “It just puts some extra wind in your sails”.
That is bullshit. Steroid use gives you sudden and dramatic gains in strength, power, and explosiveness. How dramatic? Let me quote a great article written by a doctor at Sherdog.com (the largest MMA site in the world). The article is The Benefit and Cost of Steroids – and I recommend that everyone read it.
It showed two dramatic findings: first, steroids work. Unquestionably and dramatically. Aside from the astronomic international medal count of a tiny nation with little genetic diversity and a third world economy, the data shows quantifiable individual performance improvements. With steroids, 100-meter sprint times were cut almost three quarters of a second — the difference between a world champion and a runner whose career ends in college. Athletes on steroids put the shot an additional two to five meters (World Record: 23.12m), hurled the javelin eight to 15 meters farther (WR:72.2m) and added as much as 20 meters to their discus throws (WR:74.1m).
So essentially steroids can turn someone who is merely very good at something, into one of the absolute best in the world. If you are already one of the hardest punchers in the world this thought is scary. Shane Mosely used both “the cream” (an anabolic steroid) and “the clear” (a masking agent) from BALCO labs. The purpose of these are to become more explosive and powerful. In boxing that means to become a harder puncher. You are probably familiar with the cream and the clear because they were Barry Bonds’ steroid of choice.

The other thing that Shane Mosely used before his second fight with De La Hoya is EPO, which is an endurance booster traditionally used in sports like Marathon and Bicycle Racing. This is used to increase your red blood cells, allowing you to go longer without getting tired.
In boxing most of the tragedies that occur do so after long, protracted fights. That is, it is normally the accumulation of damage that ends up causing brain bleeds and death, and generally not the massive first round KO. That is why we don’t have 15 rounders anymore (Duk Koo Kim).
The ability to maintain your power and your output into the later rounds as your opponent begins to fade is not only an enormous advantage, but it is enormously dangerous. Particularly if you already have increased power from Steroids. Steroids and Blood Boosters are both useful and dangerous individually, but together the effects are magnified.
I am not trying to say that the use of Performance Enhancing Drugs is worse than loading your gloves, and I hope you didn’t get that impression. But I was blown away by seemingly everyone acting like PED’s weren’t really that big of a deal. Because they can end careers, and change lives.
In a sport where the goal is to beat your opponent into unconsciousness, in a sport which is unquestionably already one of the most dangerous in the world, we all need to be very aware of all of the ways that one combatant can gain a dangerous and unfair advantage over another, and we should treat them all as very serious offenses. Or the sport that we all love may not be here tomorrow. And our heroes may not live to fight another day.
Oops
The cream is the masking agent and the clear is the steroid.
And I should have said this before: Very good article.
It seems like everyone in this thread is saying that PED’s aren’t that big of a deal.
I don’t think anyone is really saying that, honestly. Within boxing the cardinal sin is loading the gloves. It goes back generations. PEDs are fairly new. It’ll take time for it to come on the same level of disgrace.
And I’ve said before, and I’ll say again, failed drug tests for performance-enhancing drugs in boxing need far, far stricter penalties.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 11, 2010 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Barry Bonds doesn’t have to make weight.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
a) Increased power does not inherently require increased mass
b) EPO doesn’t affect Mass
c) Neither does any heavyweight
We aren’t talking about heavyweights. Nor baseball players, nor javelin throwers.
Boxers don’t get that much extra power from muscle. They get it mostly from form, weight and leverage. Unless they are throwing arm punches, having ripped arms is more of a drawback than it is a weapon.
And EPO blood doping is cheating. No question. Roids is also cheating, but not as much of a benefit as people would expect, especially when you are trying to make weight and need to concern yourself with water weight.
Neither of these things rise to the level of hiding secret shit behind your gloves. This is the ancient, cardinal sin of boxing. It’s a lot like corking the bat in baseball, or greasing the ball, except with brain damage.
There’s nothing new about the argument in the original post nor in anything written above by you. In being asked to “forgive” Margarito, we are also being asked to say that his crime was equal to other crimes. It is not, and never will be, the same as other kinds of cheating in boxing. It’s much worse, and it goes against the entire spirit of the sport.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Unless they are throwing arm punches, having ripped arms is more of a drawback than it is a weapon.
And if you ARE throwing arm punches, you will generate considerably less power. The notion of physique generating more power has been dispelled in the sweet science for generations. Beanpoles will usually generate more power than bulky muscular types. It’s too often that people who are familiar with other sports will apply the same rules… thinking that the advantage that a muscular welterweight has the same relative power advantages hulking, weight-limit free Bonds slugging homers. This just isn’t the case. Any trainer worth his salt will advise his fighter against getting too muscular, not just because the added bulk would detract from his form and flexibility (and therefore, his power), but also because of the negative effect on endurance. Boxing is a sport in which being heavily muscled has more drawbacks than advantages, particluarly when you have to make weight.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
I understand your point of view
and I don’t think it’s necessarily wrong to say plaster is worse than steroids or EPO. I just think we are talking about shades of gray here, and not a black and white difference.
I don’t think we are on the same page about steroids. Steroids ares not necessarily about getting ‘bigger muscles’, even though I would forgive you for thinking that if you look around your gym at the likely users. And perhaps putting the Bonds picture in my post hurt my point, rather than helped it.
Maybe the closest thing I can compare Boxing to in terms of steroid abuse is sprinting. In both being bulky (looking like Barry Bonds) would be extremely detrimental, but science (and past results) shows that you are much faster if you are on steroids. Admittedly, you don’t have to make weight in sprinting, and world class sprinters are by no means small guys, but they don’t look like bodybuilders either.
I think the basic difference of opinion we have is that you think that steroids cannot help someone punch significantly harder in a given weight class, while I disagree. We may just have to leave it at that.
How shady are the shades of grey? Just because an issue isn’t “black and white” doesn’t give anyone the excuse to say “oh they’re all the same, let’s just treat them like they’re equal.”
by taco pal on May 11, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You are cheating and putting another man’s life at risk either way. Maybe someone is 10% more likely to suffer permanent damage with loaded gloves and 5% more likely to suffer permanent damage against someone who took steroids and EPO before the fight?
Maybe the numbers are completely different than that. I have no idea. Those were completely made up.
What I do know is that you are cheating either way, and people could die because of it.
You’re just repeating exactly the same error that you made the first time.
The actual magnitude of those “numbers” is important. If it’s 5% then it dosen’t matter. If it’s 20% or 50% or 100%, then it matters a lot. You are trying to say, “oh well it’s just a difference of degree so I’m allowed to just act like there’s no difference at all.” That’s absurd. A large difference of degree is a large difference.
The correct approach is to try to determine what the real numbers are, and then draw conclusions from those numbers. Not just to say, “oh, it’s just a number, but all numbers are basically the same so who cares?” All numbers are not basically the same. Some numbers are a lot bigger than other numbers.
Yes. Again, there’s a fundamental misunderstanding about the effectiveness of muscles in providing additional power. The place it might be remotely true is among the heavyweights, and even that is fairly arguable. Big muscles will not make you a more damaging puncher against someone who weighs the same as you. If anything, it might serve to sap some of your power, with no real advantages of it’s own.
One thing that I could see roids or growth hormones aiding in boxing is the ability to move up through the weight classes without becoming fat (although, Toney obviously managed to do both). That’s the reasoning behind the attacks on Pacquaio, for instance. Not that he became a bigger puncher, but that he he was able to squeeze up into weight classes he normally wouldn’t be able to do without being fat like Marquez.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
...or Duran, for that matter
And Duran’s fatness definitely hindered his ability to be effective as he traveled upwards. It’s cheating in the sense that if you weren’t doing it, you wouldn’t be as good at higher weight classes, not that it’s making you a bigger puncher or some kind of incredible hulk bullshit. Power comes from form, weight, length and leverage, not from muscles.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
This is my final comment on the matter, but I do disagree.
Form, length, and technique are all important. I am sure that plenty of Lightweights can punch harder than 250 pound guys who are juiced to the gills that hang around at the gym. No question.
But power comes from fast twitch muscle fiber. Steroids can help you increase fast twitch muscle fiber, without necessarily adding bulk. The entire Greek Olympic weightlifting team got caught using steroids a couple of years ago. They all have to make weight, just like a boxer. Form is much more important on the clean and jerk than strength is, just like in boxing. Plenty of 65 kilo weight lifters can snatch more than a 300 lb meathead too.
But once you reach a certain level, all those guys have the mechanics of the clean and jerk down pretty well. After that it is about explosiveness and fast twitch muscle fibers. In sprinting form is more important than strength. But once you reach a high level, you have the mechanics on how to run fast down pretty well. In boxing form is more important than strength in punching. Lots of high level boxers have the form required to punch really hard. After that it is a question of how you can get as many fast twitch muscle fibers in on the motion as possible.
Again, I feel like we are running around in circles, but you still seem to believe steroids → big and slow, and that just is not the case at all.
by KyleAskine on May 11, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
But power comes from fast twitch muscle fiber.
If you aren’t punching properly, yes. If you are using your arms to punch, you may score more hits with fast twitch fiber, but you aren’t going to score more knockouts or do more damage. Arm punchers can put a beating on a guy… look at Arreola and Gomez versus Vitali Klitschko. But that kind of power is insignificant compared to a real puncher, a guy who sits down on his punches and uses his leverage. That’s why Wladimir is a bigger puncher than Vitali. It has nothing to do with muscles or even with speed. It is form times weight times leverage. That is BOXING, not weight-lifting, baseball, javelin throwing or any of these other sports people like to bring up to compare. The art of boxing is not about the strength of arms, just as the old addage “speed equals power” does not tell the whole story. Most times, the more powerful punches are the slower ones that you sit down on.
Weightlifting is doing the same thing over and over with those fast twitch muscles you refer, everything designed for the same motion and targeting a static form. It’s no better a comparison than Barry Bonds slugging homers, in my opinion. Boxing isn’t like that, and punching certainly isn’t like that.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
We disagree, and I don’t think we will ever agree about this. It happens. :)
Thanks for the back and forth though!
It's all important
None is really more important then the other. Really if you look at the big picture you can see how each thing that you guys are debating about all basically play equal roles in determining punching power in boxing. Form, leverage, weight, strength all contribute to punching power. Any weak link in the above will lower your punching power.
Recovery Time
They can also aid in recovery time allowing someone to train more often while minimizing the effects of overtraining.
How do you suggest doing this? Asking boxers who has ever loaded their wraps? Asking boxers who has juiced?
The only time we ever really know about loading of the wraps is when someone is either seriously injured, and there is an investigation, or when someone gets caught doing it.
The only time we know someone juiced is when they get caught.
So the best we can do is try to minimize serious injury the best we can. It’s clear that both cause more risk to the opponent, so both are banned.
Okay, but there is nothing “grey” about hiding hard shit inside your glove. There’s no “grey area” there. It’s meant to maximize the damage of punches period, and it’s the most cowardly sort of cheating there is. Anyone who has ever had their hands wrapped and gloved for a fight laughed their asses off at the idea that Margarito “didn’t know they were in there.” Someone would have to be both monumentally stupid and have no nerves at all in their hands to not feel plastered inserts over their knuckles. That’s the part you are most focused on, making sure it feels just right. That was a ridiculous lie.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
You lost me early in that article shaykh
Yes Margarito does have a granite chin, but he also wanted granite hands. Boxing is already a dangerous sport with some of our favorite fighters suffering from slurred speech and “punchy” effects, but when a guy brings plaster into the ring he’s got some very bad intentions. Is it unpardonable? Fight fans will decide that. I definitely can’t go along with you in your thinking that it would have made little difference against Cotto (that’s what I take from your article). Cotto was winning that fight. He does have very poor defense but if he could have lasted the Margarito shots to the final bell, he could have got a decision. And as we all know, he has not been the same fighter since that brutal KO. When a fighter gets KO’d like that, it always seems to stay with him mentally.
This is the worst sin a boxer can commit. I will have to disagree with some others on here. I do not think this was a good article. I see it as very flawed and insensitive. He could have killed someone.
Every fighter has a game plan until he get's punched in the mouth.
-Mike
I meant TKO
Every fighter has a game plan until he get's punched in the mouth.
-Mike
Cotto wasn't winning the fight.
Margarito was ahead on two cards and level on the other, if I recall correctly.
Realistically, this quote is so flawed it’s unreal:
“if he could have lasted the Margarito shots to the final bell, he could have got a decision”
After that 11th round with the knockdowns, and the prospect of a similar 12th, Margarito would have won a unanimous decision. I defy anyone to tell me that Cotto would have got a decision had that fight gone another 4 minutes. It just wasn’t going to happen.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
PEDs vs Plaster
Here’s a question:
Who’d you rather fight? A guy on PED’s or a guy with Plaster knuckles? Give me the PED’s guy please.
by erod on May 11, 2010 9:42 AM EDT reply actions 3 recs
PEDs every time!
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 11, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Is that reall the debate here?
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on May 12, 2010 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions
*really
Editor - BloodyElbow.com - SBNation's mixed martial arts headquarters.
MMA Editor - SBNation.com
by Brent Brookhouse on May 12, 2010 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't forgive everyone.
I try to have empathy for life’s situations, but sometimes accepting is the best I can come to.
What Margarito’s detractors fail to acknowledge is he landed an astonishing 237 power punches.
Shane Mosley landed 177 power punches and 71 jabs on Cotto, and Cotto left that fight without a scratch. Did just 60 power punches really make the difference? If not, what did?
Actually, I forgot he had a cut in his mouth. But still, comparatively speaking, he wasn’t anywhere close to being as hurt in the Mosley fight.
he looked worse in the pacquiao fight, and pacman doesn’t load up. just saying
Texans 19-0 in 2010-2011 season PERIOD
by battle axe of doom on May 11, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions
A number of boxing fans incorrectly compare Margarito and Capetillo’s actions to those of Luis Resto and Panama Lewis which ended the career of welterweight prospect Billy Collins. While it is true that Resto’s hand wraps were dipped in plaster, this was performed as an addition to the removal of two ounces of padding from Resto’s gloves. It was for the latter offence that both Lewis and Resto were convicted and why the tragic fight lives in infamy. Some would have you believe that the actions of Luis Resto and Antonio Margarito are the same which is nigh on ridiculous.
This is not accurate. Look, after Drath’s idiotic, vile documentary, Resto went to Dempsey’s to “unburden his soul” about everthing that supposedly happened that night. This is because Drath put the notion in his head that people would support him if he confessed. He seemed to like confessing so much that I believe he started to confess shit that never happened, like plastering his fists. The rat was just trying to get a little more time in spotlight, that’s all. If you want odds on the truthfulness of the plaster story, just consider the source.
The padding was removed from his gloves. That’s what he and Panama did, and that was bad enough. Of course, what Resto did was also slightly riskier to himself than what Margs did. Removing the padding increases the risks to hand injury even more than it increases the impact of your punches. But Margs had the protective padding of the glove over knuckle inserts that would harden into casts over the course of the fight. He turned his fists into potentially lethal, secret weapons with few drawbacks for himself. He is slime.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Excellent piece, but...
The difference between EPO and handwraps to me, is like the difference between being able to throw 14 rounds of standard punches within 12 rounds…
…and the difference between throwing ball peen hammers at your opponent.
We have Collins’ face and, yes, Cotto’s face, burned in our minds. There is no similar image of, I dunno, Ruiz’s face after the NC Toney fight. We have yet to have someone we can point to saying, “That guy there, he had his career/life ruined because that other guy took steroids.” Judging from a lot of data points, steroids, like EPO, are more about endurance (this time, during workouts) than they are an instant power-up, like the ball peen hammer hands, or the mighty infamous B-side meth.
This doesn’t mean steroids aren’t wrong. It’s just the reason why I forgave Toney and Mosley and will never forgive Margarito, whose offense far more easily could have killed a man.
This is not meant to be a “Margarito definitely did not cheat against Cotto, LOOK!” post, but:
Cotto-Margarito:

Cotto-Pacquiao:


Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 11, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Devil’s advocate point: Couldn’t Pacquiao have reopened the wounds Margarito opened?
by El Destruyo on May 11, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
(I’m not saying we’ll ever know if Margs cheated against Cotto, by the way, surprising as it would be as a one-time thing. Like Brother Naazim, though, I looked back at that fight wondering how Margs didn’t break his hand hitting so many hard surfaces, like elbows and the top of Cotto’s head. Boy was all over the place.)
by El Destruyo on May 11, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Perhaps, but the swelling is more what I’d be concerned with. Those are the only two fights in which Cotto really took a beating. The Mosley fight was competitive, and Ricardo Torres hit him plenty, too, but in neither fight did I think, “Man, he’s taking a beating.” I thought that about the Margarito fight and the Pacquiao fight. It seems likely to me that either way, Cotto is just a guy who swells up more than many do if he gets a thrashing.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 11, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Shouldn’t the relevant point be how many punches were landed on Cotto? Cotto-Mosley was competitive because Cotto landed as many punches on Mosley as Mosley landed on him. The competitiveness of a fight isn’t necessarily relevant to how much punishment a fighter takes. You can take more punishment in a competitive fight than you take in a fight where you get blown out.
The fact that Cotto swelled and was cut in the Pacquiao fight is one data point in Margarito’s favor. But it doesn’t disprove anything. Perhaps there is a physiological basis for becoming more prone to swell after it happens to you once, perhaps not. Perhaps Cotto became more prone to swell with age, or perhaps Pacquiao’s punches were more powerful than Margarito’s.
The fact remains that Mosley landed nearly as many punches on Cotto as Margarito did, and Cotto was not nearly as affected by it. This remains a data point against Margarito. It isn’t conclusive either, but the theory that Margarito cheated hasn’t been disproven. The fact that Cotto landed punches on Mosley as well and was therefore competitive overall in the fight isn’t relevant.
He didn’t swell as much in the Margarito fight as he did against Pacquaio. In fact, that was the most suspicious part for me. The damage looked different than the sort of blunted bruising you typically get from repetitive blows over the course of a fight. The lines were cleaner and more focused, as though hit with a edge. In other words, it reminded me more of this:

Holloway described something similar in his sparring injury with Margarito. He said when he was hit it didn’t really feel like a fist, but more like a flat, hard object.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
For comparison to Lujan, here’s a closeup of Cotto’s face. The general puffiness and mice that you see after Pacquaio arent’ really there. The damage is more focused. Just like with Lujan, it really does look like he was hit with some “thing.”

"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
This is far too subjective to be authoritive,
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
YOU FORGIVE SOMEONE WHO ASKS FORGIVENESS
And Margarito STILL insists he did nothing wrong. That’s like BIll Clinton still saying he didn’t have sex with that fat intern. Even Luis Resto admitted his gloves were loaded against Collins.
When Margo owns up to what he did, then we can forgive him. But not until then.
by FrankinDallas on May 11, 2010 12:03 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
That's true
But one point shaykh brings up is how some PED users have not asked for forgiveness either, nor have they truly owned up to their transgressions. They use the ignorance plea as well, yet we forgive them.
“I didn’t know it was EPO.”
“I didn’t know my trainer plastered my hands.”
I will say that owning up to one’s mistakes is a huge step in the right direction. We all make mistakes and have flaws. Yes, some mistakes are more costly then others. I know this. But at the same time, when someone can show true remorse and really takes action to change themselves, then forgiveness is something that can be given to them.
It took Resto 20 years and a cash payment to admit it though
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
True remorse
When I say true remorse, I mean true remorse. If money is involved, a book deal, or some other kind of selfish incentive then I think most people can see through that. I think the closest that I’ve ever seen someone really own up to cheating was Andy Pettite and his apology wasn’t even that good. But at least he admitted it.
say what you want about ped’s and how its just as bad as loaded hand wraps (its not, not even close) that argument can go on forever.
The fact is Margarito deserves no sympathy nor forgiveness for his actions.
"Newspapermen ask dumb questions. They look up at the sun and ask if it is shining."
-Sonny Liston
.
The silliest point in the original post is this one:
This is not a defence for Margarito.
Um, yes it is. It’s a fairly lengthy defense of Margarito followed by the claim that it is not a defense of Margarito. Sure, you acknowledge that what he did was wrong, but it’s plain as day to anyone reading the post that you are defending Margarito on the grounds that other boxers have broken the rules, and fans have forgiven them.
You obviously but ineffectively defend Margarito based on the notion that the offenses of those like Toney and Mosley are no worse than what Margarito did. But as several commenters above have amply demonstrated with logic, images, and common sense (the “which guy would you rather fighr” argument), Mararito’s offesne was not the same as Toney and Mosley’s. The results, as demonstrated by the images above, are plain to see.
So yes, this is clearly a defense of Margarito. But it’s a defense that doesn’t pass muster.
Boxing writer: "Iran, what are you going to do when you retire?"
Iran Barkley: "Rob your house"
I want to clarify to newer readers of BLH that this post was not written by any of the regular (or in my case, embarrassingly, not so regular) contributors or editors at Bad Left Hook. This post was written by one of our valued readers and promoted to the front page by Scott, the founder and senior editor of the site. At the bottom of the post, you’ll find this perfunctory remark in microscopic font:
FanPosts do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of Bad Left Hook or SB Nation. They might, though.
Speaking for myself, this post most definitely does not represent my views in any way. I would also rather not have seen it on the front page, but that is not my decision. I would regret if a casual reader checking out the site were to read this post, not notice the disclaimer, and assume it represents my view in any way, shape, or form. There is a fine line between valuing alternate viewpoints and allowing yourself to used for specious and, I believe in this case, dangerous arguments.
Boxing writer: "Iran, what are you going to do when you retire?"
Iran Barkley: "Rob your house"
by Matt Miller on May 11, 2010 1:54 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
fair enough
I’ll offer a more thorough message at the top of the post.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 11, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks
Boxing writer: "Iran, what are you going to do when you retire?"
Iran Barkley: "Rob your house"
DOES THAT MEET YOUR APPROVAL?
:)
No, you’re right — I should have been more thorough the first time around. I’ve always wished the disclaimer was more visible, but it’s just there for legal reasons, in case someone post some libelous FanPost or the like, and the subject of the post becomes aware of it before we can get it off the site. It’s to avoid being sued for allowing people to interact, as sometimes people are Class-A jackasses.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 11, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Though casual readers probably won't read down into this thread and notice this comment.
Though hopefully they’ll see Scott’s comment at the top of the original post, which is more noticeable. And hopefully they’ll understand the context.
Boxing writer: "Iran, what are you going to do when you retire?"
Iran Barkley: "Rob your house"
Damn
Miller, laying down the “the views expressed in this program do not necessarily reflect those of our station or our sponsors” gauntlet.
Well, I think SC specifically asked for this. My problem with the post is that it’s nothing new. Since day one when it finally dawned on everyone that he loaded up (which in itself was grueling process) this was the chief argument to come out of the reality-deprived folks who were calling it a witch hunt: “Yeah, okay, so he cheated. So what? Mosley is a cheater too, so why are you complaining?” Apparently this strategy just hasn’t died yet.
In other words, it’s not really a defense. It’s a diversion. Nothing about Margarito’s case is defensible, so instead you got guys hoping to dull the blade by bringing up other people and other kinds of cheating. From the best of my memory. Defending Margs has always been a tawdry, downhill business. From what I can recall, the history of it was as follows:
1) Margarito is innocent! You’ll all see once the investigation is finished.
2) They haven’t proven that it’s Plaster-of-Paris, just that it contains the same ingredients as Plaster-of-Paris!
3) Alright he rocked his wraps, I guess, but there’s no proof he did it against Cotto!
4) Shane Mosely took PEDs.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Haha!!
This is such a thinly veiled dig at me that it’s transparent. lol.
I’ve deliberately not weighed into this debate, since I know my doubts about specifics aren’t to your, or many other people’s, tastes. I was going to write a fanpost, since Scott requested one, but I probably won’t now due to Matt Miller’s concerns, which I think are serious and well-founded.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Well, no, not you specifically. Just in general this seemed to be the progression. First he didn’t do it, then they didn’t prove he did it, then ok they proved he did it but not against Cotto, then Drugs are Just as Bad. I heard the lots of people go through all these stages of denial in order.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
See? You class it as denial.
That’s an absolute view: There is a fact (100%) and your (in this case, ‘my’) belief of fact is zero (0%). This is incorrect on both counts.
I never outright denied that Toni cheated. I simply said that the evidence, as it was presented, didn’t prove to me 100% that he had. My gut feeling is that he knew about what Capetillo was doing, but those jurors must have had gut feelings about OJ too. Dempsey apparently never knew what Kearns was doing, and that never really gets mentioned.
I do not think the absolute proof is there regarding Toni’s involvement/intent, even if I believe he did know what was going on. I also do not believe that Margs loaded against Cotto, for many reasons, not least because the wraps are provided by the AC rather than the trainer in Nevada.
Anyhow, I’m not going to get entrenched in another debate with you about this: I class Toni as a cheat too, I just don’t think the powers that be did a very good job of proving it. I also don’t think it’s even worth castigating the guy for speculated crimes in the past when we already have enough to hammer him with in the present. We know he was about to go in loaded against Mosley, I’m not going to think any more or less of him than I do now if I find out for a fact that he also did it against Cotto. It’s like rape for me: Someone who does it is a rapist. They aren’t ‘more’ or ‘less’ of a rapist if they do it again, they’re still a rapist. Doubleplusrapist isn’t a term I’ve ever encountered in the dictionary.
I don’t think Toni deserves ‘forgiveness’ for what happened. I said at the time that what I, as a Margarito fan (at the time), needed more than anything was a statement from the man himself. I’ve never seen an interview where he said clearly whether he did anything wrong or not. Everything I’ve read has come from Top Rank, or Toni’s trainers, or lawyers, or Capetillo, or the enquiry. Before I can make up my mind about how I feel about Toni coming back, I don’t need him to repent, I don’t need him to be publicly flogged: I just want to hear it from his own mouth, either (a) I cheated, or (b) I honestly didn’t know what was being put in my wraps. Only then can I decide if I believe him or not, and only then can I view this case as truly ‘closed’. That’s what I want more than anything: more than Margarito’s redemption, more than his punishment, more than proof of innocence, or anything related, I want closure. I want to hear him say he did it, or that he didn’t, whether I believe him or not.
All this flannel from Arum, from everyone else, doesn’t cut it for me.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Wow. That was a lot longer than it was meant to be.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
one thing I will argue with
And do so over and over and over until people stop spreading this falsity:
[he] completed his suspension
No, see, he didn’t. His suspension WAS NOT for one year. That was simply the time at which he was allowed to reapply for a license. Which he did, in Texas. And it was denied.
He is still without a license in any U.S. state or territory. That the Mexican commissions allow him to fight is not an indicator that he “completed his suspension.” The revocation of his license was indefinite, but he was allowed to reapply after a year, not with the guarantee that he’d receive a new license.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 11, 2010 2:26 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I forgot that one:
5) He was only suspended for 1 year, so obviously it wasn’t a big deal. He’s just on a little vacation.
This one always struck as people just ignoring reality. There was no possibility of a “lifetime ban” as many people imagined, like boxing was some church you could get excommunicated from. The most you can do is strip someone of their license, which is what they did to Margarito. Just because you can reapply doesn’t mean you’ll get it back. And, to the credit of U.S. boxing, he didn’t.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Right. Margarito fighting in Mexico doesn’t mean he’s eligible to fight in America any more than Oscar Larios fighting in Japan meant he would pass a Nevada physical.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 11, 2010 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions
taking ped’s is not the same as loading your gloves.
fail.
Gatti. Dekkers. Pele. Aoki. Kang. Vanderlei. Basillio. Harry Greb.
by theworldsoldestsport on May 11, 2010 2:37 PM EDT reply actions
A lot of interesting replies
I will deal first with the suggestion that this article is strictly a defence for Margarito. It is regretful if that is how it has been perceived by some. I stated clearly that I felt the actions of Margarito and Capetillo were abhorrent and simply requested that there be consistency in terms of judgements. Essentially the comments received outline some of my concerns.
Someone correctly mentioned that Plaster of Paris is old school and as a result is seen as the cardinal sin. The use of PED’s is a relatively new phenomenon and PED violations don’t even batter an eyelid at times. As a basic example James Toney who tested positive for PED use retired John Ruiz when he beat him and simply got issued a 90 day suspension. He denied knowledge of having used PED’s knowingly and disgracefully hurled abuse at Ruiz rather than show any form of remorse or to issue an apology. Toney’s fan base wasn’t affected by his diabolical acts in the slightest.
The manner in which some have approached the argument has flaws. It is not a simple ‘Loaded gloves VS PED’ argument but it is the intent of the fighters which incurs judgement. In all the instances I have mentioned the fighters have knowingly sought to attain an unfair advantage and do what was necessary to win. They simply differed in their methodology.
If a fighter were to die in the ring in normal circumstances it would be an accident. If a fighter was a PED user or possessed loaded hands and were to fight and leave their opponent dead in the ring it would be murder. The intent is to win the fight but the fighters who seek an unfair advantage in both instances know that by doing so they are putting their opponent in significantly more danger than if they were fighting naturally, and it is this lack of consideration for ones opponents well being and selfishness that makes both acts shameful.
Fact is PED’s are dangerous. ‘KyleAskine’ echoed a lot of my views on their impact. Loaded gloves help you punch harder and inflict more damage than usual. Can anyone honestly suggest that ‘THG’ a PED that increases speed, strength and recovery time does not leave an opponent more vulnerable to fatality? Mosley used this and used ‘EPO’ in order to improve his endurance further.
Loading your gloves makes you hit harder but even with loaded gloves you will suffer normal problems of fatigue and will be less likely to hit as much or as hard later on in the fight in normal circumstances. PED’s not only ensure you are stronger and can hit harder than usual but ensure that you can hit for longer and more frequently at your unnatural new premium strength level which makes a fighter more dangerous as a whole than if he were not on the juice.
The same is true of Stanozolol which is the drug Toney (twice) and Vargas used. It causes strength gain without water retention or excessive weight gain. Something which brings hugely unfair advantages to both mentioned fighters and again it gives a fighter the ability to inflict damage he would not be able to do in a normal circumstance.
Equating which is worse technically isn’t of my concern. What is of concern is the intention behind them which is to cheat and the willingness to put the opponent in danger for ones own personal gain.
Margarito’s method is simply more tangible and historically contemptible and therefore is easier to hate. PED’s are more covert and modern but the chance of fatality for me exists significantly more frequently than it would than if the fighter were clean, which is enough of a transgression for me to suggest that the sins of Margarito can be equated to say those of Mosley. I just hope we don’t get a PED related death to prove to us how dangerous they can be.
My post wasn’t titled ‘We need to forgive Margarito’ it was titled ‘We forgive everyone else, then why not Margarito?’ I have absolutely no qualms with Margarito being a figure of hate for some but feel that if he is someone you hate on principle then that principle should extend to other fighters who share his same lack of integrity. I stated as much in my article where I declared that I would be more than accepting of a life ban for Margarito proving PED users where punished in the same manner.
All I have asked for is perspective and consistency regarding Margarito and his crime in comparison to others. If anything I hope you question yourself as to why you find actions of others forgivable when they were willing to risk the life of their opponent albeit more subtly.
As for my comment about the Cotto fight I can’t say with certainty whether Margarito loaded his gloves or not. I stated in my article that I find it unlikely that commissions, referees and trainers can miss loaded wraps all the way from Lujan upto Mosley. That’s nine fights of incompetence that some of you claim. The California Athletic State Commission is notorious for its incompetence and pictures of a battered Lujan and Cotto are not concrete evidence but mere speculation but I simply stated my opinion and didn’t claim it as fact.
It is harder for me however to ascertain with certainty how long or how many times fighters have utilised the use of PED’s. It is just as speculative. Hopefully with the possibility of regular Olympic Style Drug Testing this can be weeded out. If anything however Floyd Mayweather Jr’s campaign has raised awareness as to how easy it can be to cheat.
I stand by my opinion that Cotto was overwhelmed by the volume and constant pressure exerted on him. Whatever he did Margarito kept coming at him and emotionally he was shot. When he went down it was like ‘why doesn’t he leave me alone’, ‘why doesn’t he get hurt when I hit him’. Cotto had nothing left. Margarito landed more power punches than anyone Cotto has ever faced. Even if you think he had loaded hands he still needed to use them correctly. With loaded wraps he was never going to do that to Mosley. Mosley would have won that fight for me whatever Margarito had in his hands.
If I seem accepting of bad behaviour this is less a feature of what I actually deem acceptable and more a general apathy. I believe boxing to be an imperfect world with characters with questionable integrity and conscience. I don’t expect much of boxers in a world where the pursuit of financial benefit supercedes that of personal satisfaction and pride attained through the achievement of conquering an opponent. Just like I am somewhat desensitised to things day to day such as selfishness and violence in society I am desensitised when it comes to cheating in boxing which for me is simply represents a wider culture which reflects the world we live in. It is due to my lack of expectation and cynicism that enables me to ‘forgive’ the likes of Margarito, Mosley, Toney amongst others.
it’s obvious this has struck a nerve with everyone on pretty much the same level. If you genuinely do not support Margarito’s actions, and equally dislike PEDs, that has nothing to do with trying to convince us they are equal and that’s where I think everyone’s problem lies. It is not objective.
Personally, I try my best not to get emotionally involved with strangers, so terms like “forgive” don’t really apply when I think about either situation that was mentioned and you keep bringing it up. I don’t know who these people are in real life, just like I don’t know who Tiger Woods is in real life. That’s why I don’t give a shit or even think to care about “forgiving” Tiger Woods for banging a bunch of women on the side. I don’t care. He didn’t cheat on me. His wife is the only one who has to forgive him, not us and not the media. Do I think he was wrong? Yes. Was Mosley wrong? Yes. Was Margarito wrong? Yes. Now where did I put my fucking chinese takeout menu?
If I try and put it into a context that exists in “my world” and let’s say two guys decide to fight each other in my town, just them, and everyone else watches, then I can analyze it. It happens from time to time. You have rules, like no rings, no kicking in the nuts, etc. and if the guy says stop, you stop. If one guy uses steroids, most likely people know already, and even if they found out later they wouldn’t use it as a point of why he won, probably as a point of why he got knocked out. On the other hand, if it was supposed to be a fair fight, and the dude broke out a pair of brass knuckles or pulled a knife, he would have gotten beaten to death on the spot or later on. Either way you look at it, Margarito used a weapon. Using a weapon in a fist fight is sacrilege, grounds to be killed or banished if it’s on the street.
I know it’s a different situation, and this is a sport, but it’s hard to compare things that are so different and put them on an equal playing field from every angle you look at them. That’s why no one will agree besides some of the comparisons and reasoning that seems irrational. I don’t think anyone has said that using PEDs is fine, and that we should ignore it and praise people who use them, they just said that loading your gloves can kill someone, and it’s proven, using PEDs most likely won’t (as far as we know to date) and at their weight class it probably wouldn’t be as much of an influence. Not to mention the whole art of throwing a punch and all that jazz which holds more weight than anything else in this argument. I’ve seen guys who are 5 foot nothing break guys in half who are 6 foot 2 and loaded with muscle and juice.
To the public, the sport is supposed to be fair, and I while right beneath the surface it is a retarded statement, it goes much further than breaking the rules which thankfully you agree to. If it really was “fair”, where true equals fought each other, they would have height limits and not just weight limits and dehydrating yourself wouldn’t be allowed. You’d have to weigh the same thing when you got to the ring and the weigh-in would be right when they got to the ring. If these guys break the rules and get caught, throw em out as far as I’m concerned. I won’t lose any sleep over it. I might want to see them fight again but hey, broke the rules, take a walk asshole and go find another career.
Naazim said it a few times when interviewed and I agreed with his statement. How can you ask me what I would want to happen to the guy, it’s like asking me what I would do if someone tried to run over my kid with a car. Do you not see this the way the rest of us see it, that loading gloves is like using a weapon, an object that’s an immediate, physical danger that can actually kill the other fighter?
And I know I touched on it, but speaking of gray areas, why do we have to forgive them at all? Or why do we have to hate them? Can’t we just be indifferent to all the drama and see the situation for what it is and get back to our own lives? They’re going to do whatever the hell they want regardless of what we think. As long as we pay to see this stuff, the wheels on the bus go round and round. If anything, be more pissed off at the people who decide to keep them in boxing. It’s their actions that come first.
If people feel that strongly about keeping a corrupt sport fair, grab your picket signs and a bullhorn. It will probably help release the anger inside much faster. We should not get so worked up over other people’s lives, even if we enjoy watching the skill at which they can kick each other’s ass. If we really wanted things the way we wanted, we would take logical steps to doing so. All the fight fans would stop buying fights and stop going to them and stop buying pay per view on a global scale and the industry would halt until our demands were met. Only a boycott that hit the wallets of the ones holding the strings might cause a change.
So now that I’ve written my own article (sorry but I’m so busy with work I had to squeeze my venting in somewhere too, nothing personal) regardless of wether or not you support any of this crap, everyone on here has made valid points based on logic. There’s nothing wrong with acknowledging that or trying to see it that way. Just like it’s not wrong for us to try and see it your way. We just can’t see it if we go by all the facts on hand so trying to convince us isn’t going to happen. If you truly were indifferent and looked at the situations objectively and weighed the facts, you wouldn’t keep trying to force the point why each was equal.
But I do admire your willingness to continually disagree with everyone. I have the utmost respect for people who stir up the shit and don’t back down. Even if you agree with us, and are disagreeing just to disagree, I’d have even more respect for you ;)
A promise is comfort to a fool.
by ShadowMask on May 11, 2010 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Well Stated Shadowmask
Speaking for myself, I don’t want to ever give the impression that I was understating the gravity of loading your gloves. It is a disgusting, horrible, deplorable thing to do. I have no desire to see Margarito fight, even though his fight with Cotto was one of the main reasons I began following boxing (I freely admit I am a newer fan). And I understand the point that it’s bringing a weapon to a fist fight. I believe the amount of outrage over this is appropriate.
My only goal was to increase the outrage over PED use, because I feel that people think it is a less serious offense than it really is. The fact that a repeat offender like James Toney gets a slap on the wrist for his second offense is almost comical. If he was still a top fighter I am not sure I would feel the outrage at his next fight like I am feeling it for Margarito. If Margarito had peed hot instead of loaded his gloves I feel like some people would be excited when his 6-12 month suspension was up to have him back fighting again.
And again, very well stated.
"Never fall in love with a boxer."
Margo was one of my favorites, but he betrayed me and most of his other fans by doing what he did. For that, I do not want to see him fight in the U.S.. What he does in Mexico or any other counrty is of no concern to me.
The thing that bothers me the most is his lack of remorse. Therefore, no remorse, no sympathy.
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 12:48 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
no remorse, no sympathy.
exactly right. otherwise, we have nothing to forgive.
by steak_knife on May 12, 2010 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Again the point of the post is not asking you to forgive Margarito. The point is asking why you forgive others.
Margarito is a disgrace for not admitting to his crime and not offering any remorse or apology.
But it just pisses me off to hear things like Mosleys a nice guy he wouldnt do something like that. He never said sorry either. He used the ‘I didn’t do it knowingly’ argument.
Essentially on principle both are unforgivable surely but Mosley’s fanbase hasn’t changed in the slightest.
BTW, I find that photo noxious. Arum is bile inducing.
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 12:53 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
But which Arum is more sickening, the Valero Arum or the Margo-Arum?
by Waldo Rastel on May 12, 2010 5:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Flip a coin
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Why not Margarito?
Simple. Because loading gloves (or attempting to in Margo’s case) is the most treacherous act of cowardice in boxing. Like bringing a gun to a fist fight. PED users are seen as frauds. Coward vs Fraud. That’s my take.
"Anytime you go thirty rounds with a guy, try to kill each other, and have the utmost respect for each other, no one understands that, but guys who have been to war understand it." - Micky Ward on Arturo Gatti.
No way I was going to read all of that reply, but, this line struck me as funny:
The same is true of Stanozolol which is the drug Toney (twice) and Vargas used. It causes strength gain without water retention or excessive weight gain
Hahaha.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Using the example of James Toney as someone who PED’s turned into a ferocious, steroid-fueled killing machine is simply priceless. Hell, if anything, that’s something the other side would bring up. Tony didn’t use Stanozolol to turn himself into a power punching murderer. He used it to gain enough weight to squeeze up into the heavies without being suicidally underweight. That is it’s primary use: Changing weight classes.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Here he is hauling out "#3":
As for my comment about the Cotto fight I can’t say with certainty whether Margarito loaded his gloves or not. I stated in my article that I find it unlikely that commissions, referees and trainers can miss loaded wraps all the way from Lujan upto Mosley. That’s nine fights of incompetence that some of you claim. The California Athletic State Commission is notorious for its incompetence and pictures of a battered Lujan and Cotto are not concrete evidence but mere speculation but I simply stated my opinion and didn’t claim it as fact.
In other words:
3) Alright he rocked his wraps, I guess, but there’s no proof he did it against Cotto!
Look, I think this horse has ridden as far as it will go. The post is fairly transparent, and sounds like it could’ve been written a year ago. Nothing new has been raised here, just more vague accusations of hypocrisy. Show me a popular fighter who was caught loading his gloves with cement and forgiven, and then you can start calling people hypocrites with obnoxiuous 10,000 word screeds. So far, the only folks who have signed onto this mess are steroid "experts" who know nothing about boxing and a few kids on their moral hobby horses. Soon it will be the a same typical cranks coming out of the woodwork to proclaim Margarito’s innocence, their unswerving faith in NYSAC and the triumphant return of the Tijuana Tornado.
I’m with Miller. This whole thing was a bad idea, letting guys use BLH as a free soapbox to talk about "Oh the hypocrisy!" Makes me want to puke.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 12, 2010 8:50 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Wow..
So far, the only folks who have signed onto this mess are steroid “experts” who know nothing about boxing and a few kids on their moral hobby horses.
A bit arrogant, jrok? I guess since someone disagrees with you and your boxing and steroid “expertise” they get to be mocked. Nice.
by erod on May 12, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think it was a statement borne out of exasperation than arrogance, really ;)
I hated every minute of training, but I said, ‘’Don’t quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.'’ (Bernard Hopkins)
Yeah
I have no problem with him being critical.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 13, 2010 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I’ll say this. I generally try to avoid weighing in on Margarito anymore, but since a few of you, who I do respect, may be wondering where I really stand, I’ll throw it out there.
I think he should be banned from boxing. Period. I think that even the intention is a lifetime bannable offense.
But then what of performance-enhancing drug usage? The issue with this particular argument, to me, is not about what’s worse. We obviously know that loading your gloves with a foreign substance is, to put it as mildly as possible, wrong. It’s cowardly, it goes against the spirit of what the sport is supposed to be, and it exposes a complete lack of decency in a fighter and those who know he did it, or even helped him. And I have never for one second bought that Margarito didn’t know his hands were being loaded, just as I don’t buy that Shane Mosley didn’t know EPO and the Cream and the Clear weren’t legal, or were shit he should not have been taking. I didn’t buy it when Alex Rodriguez said his cousin stabbed him in the ass cheek with steroids, either. The plea of ignorance is not one I’ve ever accepted as a fan or observer, and to be honest, it greatly annoys me when people assume I’m so stupid I’ll buy that line, and I’m baffled by those who buy into it.
Performance-enhancing drugs are a far more frequently-occuring problem in boxing than loaded wraps. I am not saying we should diminish what Margarito and Javier Capetillo attempted to do last January, or what they may have (and in my opinion, almost surely) did before. I am not even saying one really has anything to do with the other (plaster and PEDs, I mean), because they don’t have anything to do with each other.
The question posed here is “We forgive everyone else, why not Antonio Margarito?” The article’s body makes a case. You do not have to agree with it. I do not agree with it. Many of you have formed a rebuttal, to one degree or another. That’s fine. That’s what the site’s purpose is. To discuss, to argue without resorting to childishness.
I also will say that the dismissal of performance-enhancing drugs as a problem in boxing, which is what a lot of these comments read as, is incredibly strange to me. The argument really isn’t plaster against PEDs, or what is “worse.” We should be able to agree that neither is good. You may feel they are levels of bad, but bad in this situation, to me, is bad.
To cheat the other fighter by taking a shortcut in either case is disgusting. The current slap on the wrist punishment for a failed PED test in American boxing is fucking absurd. I am personally guilty of it, too. Shane Mosley never failed a test, but is the highest-profile known steroid user in boxing. I watched James Toney and Fernando Vargas fight without second thoughts about it.
But the more prevalent in our sports culture this chemical cancer becomes, the more I strongly feel that severe punishment has been earned. The current testing system in boxing is damn near a waste of time. Frankly, to get caught, you have to be pretty reckless or even stupid about what you’re doing.
KyleAskine said above, “I don’t want to ever give the impression that I was understating the gravity of loading your gloves. It is a disgusting, horrible, deplorable thing to do. … My only goal was to increase the outrage over PED use, because I feel that people think it is a less serious offense than it really is.”
This is pretty much how I feel on the unnecessarily merged matter at hand. One comment said — and I thought it was well put — that a guy loading his gloves is a coward, and a guy using PEDs is a fraud.
Where do we draw a line at punishment, then? How do we decide that both are not unforgivable, or that one can be? That’s really the question I thought of when reading the article. It is a question I think does have some real weight to it. I’m not saying I have the answer. I’m saying it’s worth thinking about.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 12, 2010 9:46 AM EDT reply actions 3 recs
I disagree that the question of which is “worse” is irrelevant. It is relevant when one’s purpose is to rebut an argument that since PEDs carry X punishment, loading gloves should also carry X punishment. When one rebuts this argument by saying that the latter is worse, one does not necessarily say that the current level of punishment for PEDs is sufficient. The point I was making above is that even if the punishment for PEDs is sufficient, this doesn’t show that Margarito should be thought of better than he has been thought of.
The principle that punishment should be proportional to the crime is fundamental to the concept of justice in all human civilizations. I don’t think it’s inappropriate to consider the question of proportionality in this debate.
I'm with you on this. How can you "forgive" a slug whp never admitted to anything that would trigger forgivness?
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Performance-enhancing drugs are a far more frequently-occuring problem in boxing than loaded wraps. I am not saying we should diminish what Margarito and Javier Capetillo attempted to do last January, or what they may have (and in my opinion, almost surely) did before. I am not even saying one really has anything to do with the other (plaster and PEDs, I mean), because they don’t have anything to do with each other.
Well, that’s it exactly. They have nothing to do with each other. I don’t mind having discussions about PEDs and their effects on the sport. But when talk of PEDs enters a conversation about Margarito and his crime, it is transparently obvious (at least to me) that whoever brings them up isn’t serious about either glvoe-loading or PEDs. They are trying to dull the blade of what Tony did by bringing up other dark corners of the sport for comparison. I don’t like it when people do this to support any argument, not just boxing. It’s a slippery way of going about things, like “well I can’t really defend this guy, so instead I’m going to drag down everyone else into the slime to make him look better.” He also says a couple of times that he thinks it’s unlikely Margs ever loaded before, which fails the reality test. It’s no surprise that these two arguments always go hand in hand.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
That’s fair enough, and I share the sentiment that the two shouldn’t go hand-in-hand.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 12, 2010 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Never tried to make Margarito look good...
The reason I put the arguments hand in hand is not to make Margarito look more acceptable to you but to ask for some consistency.
The only link between PED’s and Loaded gloves for me is the fact that by using them you consciously endanger your opponent and that for me is a crime. I havent suggested that because everyone does a crime then an individuals crime becomes less a crime.I have argued that everyone has committed a crime yet it confuses me as to how only one person is made to feel they have committed a crime.
I havent offered a pass to Margarito not in the slightest.
I just have an issue with the fact that characters like Toney who can cheat twice dont even get a mention.
If anything I am saying ‘The guy is slime, thats the default position of Margarito, but why are other slime not defined as slime’ . Thats what im asking?
I just have an issue with the fact that characters like Toney who can cheat twice dont even get a mention
This is the second or third time you’ve used James “Tiny” Toney as the poster boy for how PEDs “endanger your opponent.” Frankly, the only thing Toney has been endangering since he started taking PEDs is the All-You-Can-Eat Rib Buffet. It is very, very hard to take your argument for equivalency seriously when you claim that PEDs turn you into a murderous, drug-fueled puncher with deadly weapons for hands and the best example you can come up with is James Toney. If anything, Toney is a case where you can look at it and say "okay, maybe the effectiveness of PEDs for boxers isn’t as cut and dry as it is in other sports." And, I mean, Toney didn’t even have to make weight! Why is that so hard to grasp?
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 14, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The more often I've heard Margarito mentioned
as an opponent for this or that high profile fighter the more strongly I wish that he’d been banned from boxing for life. I agree with SC that “intent”—at least for me and in this situation—is enough. I also agree with what he says in the post above about the issue here not being one of plaster vs. PED’s; while I may find one act morally worse than another, there should be rules in place that are tough and are followed for all infractions.
Yet this issue itself is loaded (no pun intended) and brings us around to Floyd and Manny and all the side arguments around that situation. It also brings me back to the Cleveland Williams “experiment” and a thread that I felt was shut down before a full exchange of ideas could take place. Finally, it comes back around to the insistence of some that Margo was a long time cheat—an argument, that in the end, has nothing to do with the fact that he certainly attempted to cheat against Shane and that he should be banned for that—yet where or when Margo cheated (or didn’t) before the Mosley fight is impossible to prove, and I do find it is difficult to let superficial proofs fly past without challenge—
Lujan’s destroyed ear. I find it difficult to say that it “proves” something in any clearer manner than the grotesque forehead did in the Rahman/Holyfield fight. I’d never seen anything like that either, but it doesn’t prove much at all. To work back from a fact and then fit proofs to that fact is a little bit like deciding that we need to invade Iraq and then “finding” proofs that they had particular weaponry. If loaded gloves are dangerous weapons, and if they produce the kind of damage that one saw in Billy Collins Jr., then how could Lujan take eleven rounds of being punched and not balloon up? Did the loaded gloves kick in only for one particular body part and for only part of the fight? This, of course, is a side issue, but an article like this branches off into different directions and folks are going to have differing opinions.
Bottom line for me is that Margo should be banned for what he attempted in the Mosley fight, that there is far too much cheating that is looked away from or tacitly accepted in sports—and that is indicative of much larger problems in our culture that are not going to be the food of argument (by the rules of this site) on this site. The rest is conjecture, IMO. Good post, I think anyway. Raised some old but on-going issues.
It also brings me back to the Cleveland Williams "experiment" and a thread that I felt was shut down before a full exchange of ideas could take place.
Feel free to go with that again if you want. I believe I understood your point, and didn’t mean to sound as dismissive as I did at first (I hope my reply to you showed that, but if it didn’t, now I’ve said that to you) but these Margarito threads can get out of hand, and once it went a couple pages deep in the archives I didn’t want there to be a bunch of gunk turn up that I wouldn’t see in a week or two or whatever. This one will be on the FP sidebar for a while.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 12, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
To work back from a fact and then fit proofs to that fact is a little bit like deciding that we need to invade Iraq and then "finding" proofs that they had particular weaponry.
First of all, it’s not necessary to inject politics into this to make a point, Don, come on.
Secondly, it’s nothing like that. It’s just fitting together the puzzle pieces after you’ve seen the whole picture. For me, you had a powerless performance by Margarito against, and afterwards it was revealed that Margarito had tried to load his wraps in front of a room full of commissioners and Nazim “Kojak” Richardson. And, although guys memories are beginning to get faulty on this fact, he was able to do it! They had already wrapped and gloved and signed one hand when Richardson walked in and demanded a re-wrap. They undressed him and re-wrapped twice in the presence of two commissioners and Lohuis before the inserts were discovered. This is not a small point. This comes directly from testimony. They were goddamn good at hiding those things for “first-timers.”
Then when you get over the fact that “yes, he tried to do it,” you look back at his career and see that strange way Tony seemed to push his punches, the way his punches seemed to have more steam on them over the course of a fight, the weird looking injuries, Holloway’s sparring injury and description of something that felt hard and flat. You just connect all the dots and it seems pretty damn likely that this was part and parcel to Margarito’s career. It certainly isn’t a stretch of the imagination, or coming up with a crime and then looking for evidence. It is a reasonable conclusion.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
It’s also worth pointing out that even Nazim didn’t “see” anything wrong with the wraps either. Rather, he discovered the problem with the wraps only after he felt them. This tends to show that another trainer would not have detected the problem either, no matter how closely he was watchiing, if he didn’t touch the wraps with his hand.
It took a good bit of discussion to allow him to do so, too. Three guys felt the wraps: Lohuis, Richardson and Gueverra. Of the three, Gueverra (the commish who had already signed Tony’s glove before this got started) said “it feels okay to me.” Richardson and Lohuis both felt it and said “this feels hard.” Then Lohuis ordered that they unwrap the hand and they discovered the insert. Richardson demanded they unwrap the other one, but Gueverra protested saying “no that one is fine, I checked it already.” Richardson basically threatened to sue, and so they unwrapped the other one and found the other plastered pad.
Frankly, the fact that the CSAC “internal investigation” didn’t turn up an indictment or at least a firing for Gueverra should tell you all you need to know about how these commissions circle the wagons when stuff like this happens. I smelled a rat when I read that testimony.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
So when did it start...
Heres the thing. I havent argued that loaded gloves were not used during the Cotto fight I have suggested it is possible that he didnt. There were other factors that can explain why Cotto got beat. I stated that my belief is that it is a mystery.
Pictures arent proof. None of us have anything concrete here. My argument which you are well within your right to dismiss is simply that i cant imagine him getting away with it eight times. Lujan is a fight that is mentioned but then not Williams. An equation of Margarito beat Lujans ear off means he loaded isnt a particularly stong argument. I believe Margarito to be a good boxer and havent written off the fact that he may have beat his opponents legitimately. I also havent claimed that he didnt win them all illegitimately either.
Loaded gloves are not nearly as lethal as no padding which is akin to bare nukkles
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
See,
this is the argument we had on ESB.
by Don From Prov on May 12, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Nah,
I should have left that out of there because in all honesty, the directions that interest me. …
Well, if I wanted the discussion I want, I should write a fanpost, but I’m too lazy.
But I do appreciate the offer: It, again, illustrates an open-minded approach I like on BLH.
Dicey,
the politics, right jrok? I know, but laziness once again brought the easiest (and a not completely parallel) example. I’ll just have to agree to disagree as far as being sure about Margo’s prior cheating. The man had built up a particular reputation over an entire career.
Was he cheating throughout that entire career?
A more damning question would be why would he only cheat in this one particular fight. But, of course, there could be actual answers for that, not that they’d be given much credence (and perhaps rightly so) by the boxing world at this point. And even if they were, they would not in any way mitigate what the Margarito team attempted to do. I’ve seen Margarito hit a lot of fighters without tearing their ear half off or guffing them up like he did Cotto (who does guff up), but that doesn’t prove anything either. You are right in saying that your conclusion is a reasonable one (and I sounded a little personally aggressive and should have been aware of that—apology), but I feel that mine is reasonable too. This, I think, is one that will never be known for sure unless someone writes a book—and a book might just be about making some money, so even then. …
HHmmmmm -- $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ -- hmmmmmmm
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Was he cheating throughout that entire career?
It’s anyone’s guess when it started. Could’ve been his whole career, sure. I’m skeptical that it could’ve been just that one fight. Heck, don’t you remember Cap talking about how they “prepared” his gauze the same way they “always prepared it?” Sure you have to consider the source, but then again when you consider that source you get a man who tried to hide illegal weapons inside his fighter’s gloves. The idea that the devil just crept into him that one night seems odds to me. Also odd, the way Tony’s cutman asked him in R3 of the Cotto fight “Como esta la pegada?” and Tony telling him he didn’t know. There is just too much nonsense there for me to just say throw up my hands and say “Oh well, we’ll never know for sure.” To me it’s not about “Margarito doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt”, even though he doesn’t. To me it’s just about I have got to form an opinion on the evidence in front of me. Looks and quacks like a duck to me.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Well,
according to a lot of folks in prison, the devil just crept into them for one night.
the question would be why just cheat in the Mosley fight?
Again, there might be answers, but that is secondary to the fact that he did try to cheat.
I’m not going to try to change anyone’s mind on this, especially as I’m not working from a platform of feeling sure about it, and—again—it doesn’t matter to me rule-wise because once is enough (though there are very real questions and concerns about the impact on the careers of others if Margarito was cheating all along). What I am interested in is what “Como esta la pegada” means—
I have no clue.
Irony,
jrok. Maybe I should have added the :).
So, what does “Como esta la pegada” mean?
“How is the punch?”
Answer: “I don’t know. I don’t know.”
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
I think there was also a point later in the fight when Capetillo says something like “By now, your punches should be solid.”
Ah,
I’d really like to let this go (so I should) but all of those statements could = anything at all.
Is there some science that tells exactly how long it should be until the plaster has hardened? The only “experiment” in this shit that I’ve ever read about was the Williams one and that is being discounted. Panama Lewis is not going to forthcoming on the art of soaking handwraps any time soom, and there are still arguments about whether Resto’s handwraps were soaked (and whatever Margarito was doing, he wasn’t soaking handwraps in a bathroom). I’m not going to believe Lewis, but I watched that documentary and I also think that Resto says what he thinks he should say—or can get away with saying. On ESB, I had a go-around with Ted Sares about the whole Resto thing. At the time Ted felt that Resto was lying about having his tapes doctored to add lurid details he hoped would = money. Ted felt that a wrapped hand in a glove with stuffing removed was a more dangerous weapon than a gloved hand. I didn’t. The argument went back and forth about bare fist vs. gloved hand. In the case of what Margo said in the Cotto fight, there could be many meanings. First, there is a matter of translation and nuance; second, Margarito almost always took time to land clean blows and wear an opponent down.
There are any number of narratives that could be put forward to show it was possible that Margartio started cheating in—I don’t know, probably any fight after Williams, and those narratives could leave open the possibility that the Mosley fight was the first one that he cheated in. Wouldn’t be hard to construct logical narratives pointing to a number of possibilities. You know this is the kind of argument that can burn one out on boxing: Margarito (not the damage he may have done) is not worth the argument. I really don’t hope to or want to change anyone’s mind as I sure as hell don’t know for sure, but if people are going to keep throwing “proof” out there, I’m going to respond if I feel that it doesn’t add up to much or is very ambivalent.
Apologies ahead of time Taco Pal if you weren’t putting that out as evidence.
by Don From Prov on May 12, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
At the time Ted felt that Resto was lying about having his tapes doctored to add lurid details he hoped would = money.
I agree with this. That’s the way I see it. No reason to take Resto’s word on anything. He was just trying to get his full ten minutes back in the limelight. He would’ve confessed to loading his gloves up with 45 mags and blowing Billy away if he thought of it.
Jeez, now I’m thinking of that “documentary” again and my blood gets boiling. Drath and Resto hanging around in Billy Sr’s front yard. Surprised the shotgun didn’t come out to greet them.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Every
right to take the shotgun out.
Disgusting, staged, and self-serving.
People fuck up. And then they make it worse by lying.
And then, some folks are just scumballs.
by Don From Prov on May 12, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
That fucking piano music, all those closeups of Resto gazing out the window. Very disturbing the way they hacked that thing together.
And Arum’s quote, where he blames Collins and basically accuses him of faking. I’d say Bob is gonna burn in Hell, but that would be an insult to fire.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 12, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yet,
and I do say yet if there are different tiers of hell—
The worst has to be saved for Lewis.
by Don From Prov on May 12, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Somewhat in fairness to Arum, he does not express any sympathy for Lewis or Resto, and in fact says that it was right to ban them for life.
I believe what Arum said is that fights were offered to Collins after the Resto incident, and that his father turned them down because he thought it would hurt their lawsuit. That doesn’t mean that he (Arum) thought Collins wasn’t really injured.
No, he expressly claims that the injuries were not severe, and that Billy could’ve fought if he wanted to. I mean, even if you look at what you just said about it, Bob was being sued and “offering Collins fights.” This is a kid who’s sight was ruined, and Bob is saying “what do these people want? I’m offering them fights.” yeah very generous of you Bob.
And he does toss a turd out there about there being no medical evidence to prove Collins couldn’t fight again, which he backs up with zilch. It’s a driveby sliming that Drath doesn’t reference it again in the film. Slime, Slime, Slime.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
You’ll have to show me a clip or a transcript before I make a final judgment here, because I don’t trust either one of our off-the-top-of-our-heads recollections.
And remeber the piano music---arrrgh
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions
PUKE PROVOKING
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Arum makes Suliman look good for God's sakes.
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I think it means Tumbo is a slimball
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes.
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Not if I ever run into him.
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh.
That could be seen as odd.
Anyway, I hope he doesn’t get a big purse rematch with Martinez, or a fight with Manny.
It’s a strange thing for anyone to ask, and especially for a cutman to ask. “How is the punch?” “I don’t know. I don’t know.”
I used to like Margarito a lot. I hate it that he turned out to be scum. But he is scum. And with the slime peddler Arum at the wheel, my fear is that every one of these “Why don’t we forgive Margarito” things that pops up on his radar will be used to load his guns for a U.S. license.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Mosley and Margarito situations are completely different
Margarito’s plaster could have seriously killed or ended someone’s career. Who knows how long he was using it for. I cannot forgive someone that would do that to someone else.
by GoldenSt8OfMind on May 12, 2010 12:17 PM EDT reply actions
‘What interests me is the selective forgiveness of analysts and fans and how selectively they retain and use information’ – that seems to me the cenral point of your argument and IMO it is a valid point you raise – the way the sport is organised and run means that that it is ineffective when dealing with cheating and punishments seem pretty arbitary. To what extent does who you are, how much $ you are worth, where you are from etc determine the punishment you will be given ? I seem to read endless stuff on Pacman and his alleged use of PEDs, whilst other proven offenders are discussed as if it had never happened. This is the Margarito dilema – on the one hand many of us would like to see him banned for life and see his legacy as forever tarnished – on the other hand when Toney was only given a pitiful 6 month ban for his second offence then a lifelong ban for Margarito by comparison seems inappropriate and out of proportion. It’s one of a number of compelling aruments in favour of the sport needing an international governing body.
Good post
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions
But two wrongs don't make a right.
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 3:21 PM EDT reply actions
You are right Ted
two wrongs clearly do not make a right ! The type of bans I’d like to see in place are:
Fist Offence PED use – 2/3 year ban
Second Offence PED use – lifetime ban
On that basis I think Margarito offence would clearly qualify for a lifetime ban.
You could build in some margin of leeway for those that are willing to confess and help with further investigations / provide information about others involved.
Boxing needs to catch up – if you look at the impact that being caught had on Ben Johnson 20+ years ago and compare how little impact it has had on Toney and co in more recent times. One looks like a sport serious about the issue another (where the consequences could be much more serious) has not. Unfortunately it’s the sport that we love that has shown a lack of moral courage. But there is still time to change.
I love Boxing
But you could make a pretty decent argument that its in the" entertainment " industry more than its a sport . Cheers Bristol. As for Margocheato , the bloke and his team are lowlifes but I dont really care if he fights again. At least his gloves will be well scrutinised . He’s toast anyway . His chin is gone , he cant make 147 anymore and after the Mosely fight his aura of indestructability is gone .
"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me. " Hunter S Thompson.
You do love love Boxing mate
of that there can be no doubt and indeed like your mate Goaty your knowledge of the sport puts me to shame ! Maybe you’re right, but I guess I’m like the bloke who clings on hoping that the Sheila who is bad news will prove to be the special bird I’d hope she’d be :) Honestly I think if Boxing carries on as it is it’ll become a complete Joke – I love Footy too – as my old man told me it’s always good to have a backup plan. I think the next few years are shit or bust for Boxing – I still believe it can be sorted.
All of you guys here on BLH know boxing. I am astounded by the youg Brits and their knowledge and also of the Aussies and other International blokes.
Don from Prov who I had dinner with on Monday night in Providence and I were discussing that very thing.
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions
And, of course, the lovely C was with us as well.
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 12, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Great meal, great to see
Ted again. And the Aussies, Brits, and young Scottish lads do add a lot to this site.
by Don From Prov on May 14, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I love you for making a distinction between
British and Scottish, not many people will do that!
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 14, 2010 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm half Scottish myself.
That half of me nightly pummels the British half.
Brutal affairs, bedtime for me.
by Don From Prov on May 14, 2010 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Welsh are people too?
This has been the most life-affirming thing for me, to know you're valued and then show your resolve to not just curl up and die,
--Nick Charles
by The Midnight Rambler on May 15, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes, Ted
and they are a country filled with, if I may repeat myself, beautiful women.
by Don From Prov on May 19, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
P.S.
I wasn’t forgiven; I was sentenced. And so shall we all.
F#ck Antonio.
Amen, brother, amen
Good, so it can’t go any deeper – Arturo Gatti after being told he was cut to the bone
by The Midnight Rambler on May 20, 2010 2:54 PM EDT reply actions

by 





















