Role Reversal - Pacquaio the villain and Mayweather Jr. the hero? What a difference a year makes
via pacejmiller.files.wordpress.com
Ray Chiongbian last week was the latest opponent to find himself on the end of a beating by Manny Pacquiao. Receiving in excess of 100,000 votes (nearly double that of his political rival); Pacquiao achieved a landslide victory resulting in his appointment as Congressman of his wife's province of Sarangani.
There is little doubt that Pacquiao won the popularity contest resoundingly back in his native Philippines, but back in the States, Floyd Mayweather Jr. is proving to be significantly tougher opposition than Chiongbian and is completely outfoxing Pacquiao in the PR department.
When initial talks commenced regarding the prospect of these two superstars stepping into the ring, there was no question as to who occupied the role of hero and villain in the piece. Fast forward to the present and the scenario has changed dramatically. Dare I say it; Mayweather may even be the hero and Pacquiao the villain?
February 2010 may be the pivotal point in Mayweather's career. Following the collapse in discussions between Camp Pacquiao and Mayweather, the next step for both proved crucial. The announcement that Mayweather had agreed to fight 'Sugar' Shane Mosley on May 1st raised many eyebrows. A man much maligned for taking risk aversive options both in and out of the ring had surprised everyone by agreeing to fight who many deemed to be his biggest threat.
Mayweather's detractors stopped moaning about the Juan Manuel Marquez farce. It even brought a halt to the Baldomir jokes and ensured suggestions that he was ducking Mosley could finally be put to rest. Mayweather himself stated "This one is for the fans, I have said since I came back to the sport that I only wanted to fight the best." And no-one could deny that fighting Mosley represented that exact sentiment.
Mosley's stature as a threat to Mayweather had been built by his knockout victory over Antonio Margarito and the refusal by the Pacquiao camp to entertain a bout with him following his victory. Freddy Roach's posturing over Mosley's weight with the 'We won't fight him at 144, 142 and eventually 140' scenario, along with Roach's infamous interview where he tactlessly informed the boxing public that "Shane came to the gym twice to ask me to let him fight Manny. I told him no both times for the same two reasons: First there isn't enough money there, and second, you're too good a fighter" has been detrimental to Pacquiao's reputation.
Mayweather's prioritising of money and alleged safety first attitude are what had ensured he wasn't a fan favourite, but essentially with the signing of the Mosley fight the roles had been reversed. The fact that the fight itself achieved 1.4million PPV buys and Mayweather pocketed $40million makes Roach's comments even more prone to criticism. Mayweather realises he can combine legacy and money, bringing back old and creating new fans. If taking the fight with Mosley didn't turn his detractors the manner in which he fought certainly did.
After being rocked in the 2nd round, Mayweather fought brilliantly winning the next 10 rounds in convincing fashion, and that whilst being on the front foot. The fact that he came to fight and his handling of adversity is what won him many fans that evening. Being hurt in the 2nd round was hugely beneficial to his standing as it showed Mosley was dangerous and that Mayweather was willing to face danger head on. Post fight Mayweather expressed his desire to have pleased the fans and he had succeeded. Marquez and Baldomir are well and truly forgotten and suddenly the public remember his fights with Corrales and Castillo.
Pacquiao meanwhile finds himself in the traditional Mayweather position where he is viewed as taking easy fights. Arguments about De La Hoya being weight drained, Cotto and his catchweight, Clottey being a punchbag, and Pacquiao's alleged ducking of Mosley are more frequent in light of Mayweather's conquering display. Mayweather talks of Sergio Martinez as his next opponent whilst Bob Arum shamefully suggests Antonio Margarito. Mayweather suggests stepping up to fight a World Champion two divisions higher than him whilst Pacquiao fights a disgraced boxer who most would prefer never boxed again.
If Pacquiao's reputation wasn't dwindling enough, this fiasco regarding WADA drug testing has damaged it even further. This is probably Mayweather's most effective move in ensuring he is the favoured fighter of the two. I don't for a second believe he is concerned with cleaning up the sport, nor does he really care if Pacquiao is on drugs. Cut off dates aren't negotiable if he is serious about WADA's principles. 24, 18 or 14 days doesn't really make a difference to Mayweather but it clearly does to Pacquiao.
Mayweather has utilised an issue he doesn't care about as a bargaining chip in being able to set other demands. He has also cast doubt on Pacquiao's morality and achievements along with giving the impression that by being negotiable over these irrelevant numbers, he is doing everything in his power to make the fight happen.
The PR victory certainly belongs to Mayweather who has not only won over fans with the legitimacy of WADA demands, but has planted seeds of doubt in the minds of many a boxing fan as to whether Pacquiao is on the juice. Pacquiao himself has exacerbated the situation with a litany of ludicrous excuses regarding his disapproval of random blood testing. His opposition has asked the questions and he has failed to provide satisfactory answers. Not only has the Filipino been presented as someone who ducks fights and cherry picks, but he has also been presented to be a cheat and a fraud. And most importantly fans are starting to believe it. Chiongbian could not have produced such an effective smear campaign.
This time last year Pacquiao had just blown out Ricky Hatton spectacularly in two rounds. He was everyone's favourite fighter. He was viewed as exciting, humble, a warrior who was a seven division World Champion that had fought all comers. No-one had anything but praise for the 'Fighter of the Decade'. Mayweather meanwhile was being criticised for further cherry picking due to agreeing to fight the significantly smaller Juan Manuel Marquez. One year later the roles are reversed. Mayweather has never been so popular and Pacquiao so unpopular.
Pacquiao might have been able to win the PR battle with Chiongbian, but in Mayweather's case Pacquiao is way behind in the polls right now. What a difference a year makes.
FanPosts are user-created content written by community members of Bad Left Hook, and are generally not the work of our editors. Please do not source FanPosts as the work of Bad Left Hook.
225 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
First, thanks for posting the piece. I don’t totally agree with what you’re saying, but it is certainly a good discussion starter.
Honestly, I just don’t see the “people are saying Manny is taking easy fights” thing. I mean, it is easy in hindsight to say “ODLH was weight drained and shot,” but at the time, most folks thought Oscar was simply too big for Manny. All in all, most people still view that win as a real feather in Pac-Man’s cap.
As for Cotto and Clottey, those guys are better than any two welterweights Floyd has taken on. If you want to argue that Cotto is semi-shot, fine, but you have to say the same thing about the version of Mosley that PBF fought. I don’t see where there’s anything negative about the Clottey win; while it was boring, Josh was in the prime of his career, and is a guy that PBF has basically ducked. (which is a good thing, as PBF-Clottey would be one of the most boring fights of all time). Bottom line, one win over an aged Mosley doesn’t erase the questions about Floyd’s choice of opponents over the years, and Manny has in a very short time fought two consensus top 5 welterweights.
Where I do agree with you is on the PED thing. Fair or not, Floyd’s done a good job of casting doubts on Manny’s accomplishments. While I genuinely believe Manny’s fear of testing shortly before the fight is real, and is simply a product of an irrational superstition, I “must confess” that the refusal to agree to the testing, in the face of an absurd payday for a fight against Floyd, has caused me to have some doubts.
So, bottom line is, I don’t think they’ve really reversed roles, but I do agree that it has gotten a little closer.
by The Boxer Rebellion on May 17, 2010 9:22 PM EDT reply actions
Josh was in the prime of his career, and is a guy that PBF has basically ducked. (which is a good thing, as PBF-Clottey would be one of the most boring fights of all time).
I’ll also add that nobody on earth has never demanded Mayweather-Clottey, so I can’t say Mayweather ducked him. Who wants it? Plus, Clottey was like fourth in line even by totally fair, boxing results only measures.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 17, 2010 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions
I think I overstated it
in fact, I think that was mostly informed by my recollection of Roger or Floyd Sr basically saying something like, “Josh Clottey ain’t nothing to [mess] with.” I guess the somewhat flimsy point is that Clottey has been an legit potential opponent for Floyd for years, but he’s never fought him.
by The Boxer Rebellion on May 17, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I think it’s gotten closer. One thing that bugs me a little in the back of my head is, you know, Pacquiao’s a politician. Since when have I believed in politicians?
Not that I don’t have all due respect for Pacquiao. I do. Mayweather, too. But the fight not happening stinks, a little bit on both sides, and Mayweather and family’s baseless mud-throwing has worked from a PR perspective, I think.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
What really bothers me is people aping Mayweather and saying he's doing it for the good of the sport
Which is why he required the undercard to get ADA testing. And why he makes sure the fighters in his stable get random testing. And why he’s laid that out as a condition to having Golden Boy co-promote his fights that they’ll have high level drug testing on their cards.
Oh wait, no he didn’t. That’s because Floyd only does what’s best for Floyd. He’s afraid his opponent might have some unfair advantage, so he’s holding firm. Fine, that’s his perogative. But don’t give me any “he’s saving the sport” bullcrap.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
by Brickhaus on May 17, 2010 11:29 PM EDT reply actions 5 recs
I don’t care why he’s doing it, I just appreciate that he is doing it.
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
by lcollins1 on May 18, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
To do the rest of the fighters and the cards would be really expensive
and why is he doing it, Brick? – I mean he made Mosley do all that bullshit, and they signed the two year suspension contract. What’s the point? Well, I think he’s got three main factors playing in his head that convince him “I want blood testing”:
1. PEDs substantially help boxing performance
2. Manny Pacquiao may be on PEDs
3. Boxing’s current PED testing is nonexistent
Are either of those clearly false? – Hell no, and the first and third are clearly true. So I do give him some credit. It’s self-serving, but he’s trying to ensure an equal playing field. How anyone can criticize him for that just wreaks of personal dislike. And I personally dislike Floyd, but not enough to bitch at him about this one. This is a total ‘win’ for boxing, bottom line.
Here’s the bottom line – boxing’s drug testing is a donkey show. It is literally a mexican donkey show – that’s how bad it is. Floyd, in a tiny percentage of fights (only his own), is elevating the testing levels to near Olympic level, the highest level of drug testing in any pro sport. That’s bad?
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
by lcollins1 on May 18, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
But he's just trying to create an "equal playing field" for himself
And frankly, without it, the playing field is still equal. There’s nothing preventing him from monkey business either. It’s not like Pacquiao gets to play by different rules.
Sure, it would have been expensive to have the testing for the entire card, but he made, what, $40 million on the fight? Surely he could spend about $20,000 of that to make sure the ‘sport’ is clean.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
by Brickhaus on May 18, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Couldn't Agree More
Another point to make is how many fights since mayweather made those comments have had random blood testing? Mayweather-mosley and that’s it i think. If another fighter who didn’t have mayweathers negociating powers made that demand the other fighter would go somewhere else.
I predict if mayweather pacquiao gets made we’ll have random blood testing in that fight and then if floyd wins he’ll retire and will not care about drug testing again.
so because it hasn’t had a positive impact on the whole sport immediately, we should abandon ship on what he’s doing?
Look – I’m happy with what Floyd’s doing on its own. I (and you) watched Mosley v. Mayweather and we had some pretty damn good assurance that the combatants were clean. You can’t say that about any other fight you or I have ever seen, amateur olympics excluded. So even by itself I appreciate what Floyd is doing.
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
by lcollins1 on May 18, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nah i wasn’t saying we should abandon it im just saying no other fighters seem to be following him with pressing demands of testing. This is probably because it makes them seem like they are calling the other person a cheater by demanding more than the commision asks. That’s what happened with the judah-mosley negociations. If mayweather wants to clean up the sport hes gotta put serious pressure on the state commisions.
You have a point..
..but at the same time Mayweather can really only control his fights, which is why he can dictate that shit to anybody who wants to fight him and not to people who aren’t fighting him.
At the end of the day why does it matter why he’s doing it? It’s a good thing to get more drug testing in boxing. If I pick up a piece of trash from my yard and then run up and down telling people I did it to help the environment knowing damn well I did it solely because I want my yard to look nice, I still helped the environment didn’t I? So who gives a shit what my true intentions were as long as a) something good happened b) nobody got hurt in the process.
He can control the rest of the card he's promoting
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
I don't think it's his place to do so....
by erod on May 18, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
He's promoting the card, he's the headliner, he can make whatever demands he wants
If he can get Wes Ferguson and Cornelius Lock on all his undercards, he can make them do drug testing on the rest of the card.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
by Brickhaus on May 18, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
And FWIW
Sauerland has been doing it with their cards for a while now, so there is precedent for a promoter forcing the issue.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
Floyd shouldn't have to pay for this shit
this should be standard fare. It’s unreasonable to ask him to pay for high level testing for fights he’s not a part of.
It’s not unreasonable to make the promoters or commissions to pay for it at the top levels.
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
Agree totally, erod.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
And I'm fine with him doing it
Just don’t go around saying you’re cleaning the trash of your lawn to save the environment, especially if there’s other trash you could pick up with minimal effort and you fail to do so. You’re cleaning up the trash off your lawn to clean up your lawn.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
I could clean up my neighbors lawn too, but that’s assuming they actually want me too……what if they don’t want me stepping on their property? Shouldn’t I respect that that even though we are on the same street?
In other words, even though they fight on the same card, does he have a right to tell other fighters who are NOT fighting him, what to do? They may not feel the same about PED use as he does.
But then it’s not really cleaning up the sport, is it? It’s just cleaning up his fights.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 18, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Agree with the above. Cleaning up the sport would be him putting pressure on State commissions not individual fighters. Him putting pressure solely on Pacquiao isnt cleaning up the sport.
And even as a basic point, even with Pacquiao he isnt being true to the WADA principles.
If he is willing to negotiate cut off dates this completely contradicts the randomness of the WADA principles. You can’t say I’m willing to implement these principles all the way up until X days until the fight.
But the fact that many people believe his actions to be noble or he is doing something good illustrates that he is indeed winning the PR war.
I think the ends could justify the means if it raises awareness, because awareness sorely needs to be raised with the state commissions. But no I don’t think he’s genuinely doing it for the good of all mankind or anything.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 18, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah...
..but he can’t really clean up the sport himself. Even if he made his cards and promotions all have olympic drug testing, that’s not the entire sport either. At the end of the day all of the athletic commissions still have to adopt it.
I see where people are coming from though. He can do more if he’s truly adamant about cleaning up the sport.
True - it's only cleaning up his sport BUT
1) I appreciate that by itself even if nothing ever comes after that
2) it may have a positive impact on the commissions
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
No the playing field is only equal without Floyd's efforts if we operate from the assumption
that everyone is on PEDs equally. Is that true? – Hell no. Are you telling me that third world prospects have the same access to PEDs as landed pros? – No chance.
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
They also don't have the same access to gyms with equipment
Or legal supplements that all of these guys take.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
Whatever his reasons for demanding it, it is good for the sport. Second, he cannot impose stipulations on contracts to which he is not a party. He could express a desire to have it, but the two fighters and their promoters/managers do not have to agree since he is not in privity of contract with those parties. Moreover, his (Mayweather’s) opponent may be willing to agree to the WADA testing, but would not want other unrelated parties have essentially a veto right on their contract.
Best solution is for Nevada to lead the way and adopt WADA testing.
Yea
so hopefully the commissions will feel pressure to get their heads out of their asses on this one issue.
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
See Floyd's winning...
Regardless of Floyds intentions his cause sits well with everyone here it seems because if implemented correctly it is good for the sport. He has got everyone loving the idea which has benefitted him hugely PR wise.
And the fact that it makes rational sense to most seems to have turned many against Pac who seems to be rejecting a good cause.
His excuses, Roach’s ‘you can’t detect anything in a blood test’ ramble have all made Pac look a fool somewhat. Even if Floyd is insincere then why reject something which results in something inherently good?
yea it’s true.
I didn’t think Pac was juicing anymore than any other guy. (I tend to think everyone I see on TV is juicing). But, after he started refusing the testing, I changed my tune. When he said “I don’t like needles” – that one really smelled like bullshit. When the guy with tats tells you he doesn’t like needles, that smells bad.
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
I dunno really, the reason he doesnt like it is because it got done the day before the morrales fight when he was already having to starve himself to make weight. When you combine that with getting blood taken it may have an effect but we can’t be sure.
I personally don’t think he’s on anything and bob arum just didn’t want to submit to mayweather’s demands the first time. I’m not naive enough to think that he couldn’t be on anything though i just want some proof first other than Mayweather Snr saying “something ain’t right”.
The Morales thing suggests that he was simply struggling to make weight. Even with the blood test thing he mentions he was supposed to have water on the advice of his doctor but was not allowed to as he was starving himself.
It may be simple superstition but his excuses really dont hold weight especially when other athletes have blood tests significantly closer to the event time than 14 days and even on the day itself.
This reflects badly on Pac especially if it becomes more prevalet in boxing. Ward and Green have agreed to it just as Mosley did and Martinez is willing to. The only negatives towards it are from the Pac camp.
It's not uncommon
For athletes to strongly believe that having blood taken for tests weakens them. Many runners are quite vocal about it. It’s mostly superstiton but it’s still how they feel.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 18, 2010 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
And those runners have to put up with the highest drug testing standard in the world at the Olympics. And you know why it’s not unfair? Because each athlete is tested equally often.
Pacquiao may feel out of ignorance blood testing weakens him, but then it’s the duty of the people around him to settle his fears.
The fact is the amount of blood needed in a drug test is a fraction of what you give when you donate blood. It is nowhere near the amount necessary to affect you, that’s reality. If Pacquiao believes differently then someone should correct him. Besides, Mayweather will be tested as often as Pacquiao is, so he’ll get no advantage.
by CavsLebronFan on May 18, 2010 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions
to play devil's advocate
Pac’d say “I’m smaller, so the 3 tablespoons will effect me more” – which is bullshit at this point.
And, nobody’s even talking about doing it the night before or even within a week of the fight. Pac’s argument is pure, baseless superstition at best, and an attempt to avoid being caught cheating at worst.
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
The fact that Mayweather was willing to compromise all the way out to 14 days before the fight convinced me he wanted the fight, and the fact that Pacquiao wouldn’t agree even to that convinced me he didn’t want the fight.
by CavsLebronFan on May 18, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't really think it's as black and white as that
But talking about it quickly becomes about as fun as pulling teeth IMO, so I’ll just keep to myself on the issue.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 19, 2010 6:26 AM EDT up reply actions
highest testing in the world
I see your point, but year after year medals are stripped from winners when they are eventually found out. Cheating is always going to be ahead of testing. I’m not saying don’t test, but the reality of it is the testing is not capable of catching those on the cutting edge of enhancement.
Boxing’s testing I’m sure could be improved, but to ask Manny to got above and beyond what is required because Floyd must feel the current Manny is too good is bogus.
and as far as he people should settle his fears is unfair. Some people are scared of spiders or tall buildings, or flying. No one would say, it is up to his friends to settle his fears. Fear is not about what the danger really is, it is about the perceived danger, and that can’t be settled easily.
You've clearly never gotten a tattoo
because the experience is in no way related to getting blood drawn.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
You've clearly never had blood drawn
they both involve needles right?
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
Tattoo gun != syringe.
The atmosphere is different, the sensation is different, the dogma is different. It’s a stupid argument, and I’d like to think you’re better than it.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Thanks for the character advice Dad
The atmosphere is different
Is Pac an 18 year old girl on prom night? What the hell does that even mean? – Do we need to set the mood? – get some Marvin Gaye cranked up maybe. It’s a blood-draw, not sex, brain surgery or a pot party.
It’s a stupid argument, and I’d like to think you’re better than it.
Listen Bob Marley, Pac’s the one who said he doesn’t like needles in response to a question about blood testing. And, there is fluid exchange, including blood, in both processes. So I think it’s a pretty apt comparison, despite your ephemeral, perhaps “spiritual” concerns.
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
Um
I don’t want to get into an argument, not even a little bit. But I’ve watched a few tats being done, and had my fair share of blood drawn, and I would say that they appear to be two very seperate experiences.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 24, 2010 6:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Yup.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
That's not really the point
The point is they both involve needles. Either you are afraid of needles or you’re not.
It’s like saying you are afraid of heights but you can go skydiving because skydiving involves jumping out a of plane and not being on top of a building. Yes they are two different experiences, but as it relates to your fear, they are the same.
It's not really the same as heights
Just because two things have the same name doesn’t mean they are the same.
It’s not that important though. I know that they are very different experiences, but I still think that Pacquiao should submit to the tests. However, 14 days seems like a reasonable compromise.
Overall, I don’t care and I’m fed up with their shennanigans. Mayweather may have started it, but both sides are as silly and petty as each other.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 26, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions
err, I don't know, but...
I’ve never read anything that has Pacman admitting it himself that he’s afraid of the needles. I’ve always read Bob Arum saying that, though. I don’t think Pacman’s afraid of the needles, he’s just apprehensive about his blood taken away from him. Aaand yes, that’s a stupid belief.
That's a stretch.
Should Manny also be afraid of knitting because it involves needles?
Getting a tattoo and having a syringe put in your arm are two totally different things. I was very apprehensive getting my first tattoo because I hate getting blood drawn, and within three seconds I realized the two acts are incomparable.
I’ll restate what I said above. This is a silly talking point. I only mention this at all for those who have never gotten a tattoo and genuinely do not know anything about it. There’s nothing wrong with that lack of knowledge, it’s just an experience you have not had so I’m here to share mine. I won’t bother with people like lcollins1 have an agenda and won’t be changed no matter what reality says.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Mayweather was unpopular because people felt he didn’t fight the best opposition. He took on Mosley, and he didn’t just beat him, but the way he beat him impressed and surprised a lot of people. He got hit hard, he took it and didn’t run, he came after Mosley. And even fighting aggressive he still made Mosley land a ridiculously low %. Mayweather made that crowd cheer for him as the rounds went on. And he’s slowly turning public opinion his way since his comeback.
As well as that, largely due to the Mosley fight, i think most people now think Mayweather will beat Pacquiao, and that always helps get fans.
And Mayweather’s argument compared to Pacquiao’s has more logic. The common man can’t understand how a guy declines 40-50 million dollars because he doesn’t feel like getting a blood test.
This seems like revisionism here:
He got hit hard, he took it and didn’t run, he came after Mosley.
What I remember happening is Mayweather getting rocked, and then clinging to Mosley like a static-charged shirt while the ref didn’t do anything about it. After the round was over, he changed his style (slightly!) and Mosley quit fighting, resulting in a dominating one-sided victory for Floyd.
Well-earned though his victory may be, let’s not paint him to be Rocky out there or something. He did take some shots, and he did recover well. But he got a not-unreasonable amount of help from the ref, and took a time-out to regain his composure before changing things up.
Even Floyd’s biggest haters won’t accuse the guy of being stupid or weak-willed.
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Oh please....
Don’t blame the ref. That’s the weakest BS I’ve heard to date about the fight. You need to watch that round again.
The ref was perhaps a touch jumpy in getting between them
But Mayweather’s survival was still very good. Mosley didn’t really seize the initiative very well though, on the other hand.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 26, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions
On the whole fight, I agree that the ref was a bit jumpy getting between them.
On that particular round, I disagree. But then, it doesn’t much matter. I’ve talked about that a few times in different threads, so my opinion is out there. Essentially, I don’t think that Mayweather only survived because of the ref, but it did seem odd at the time that the ref wasn’t sticking to his M.O. for that particular round. Did it help? Of course it did. Did it alter the outcome of the fight? I’m almost certain it didn’t.
Mosley quite attacking. And like in chess, the moment you quit attacking is the moment you begin to lose ;)
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Very good :)
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 26, 2010 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm a casual fan.
I think far less of Mayweather & co. for accusing Pac. of taking drugs, not less of Pac. for ignoring Mayweather’s demands. That is such a low blow to boxing.
So I totally disagree with that point.
I think the only way Pac. can become a bad guy is if he is actually found to be doing something illegal to help his ability to win.
And I agree that Pac. should ignore Arum’s ideas about Margarito. Manny would do well for himself by shrugging off some of that filth that continues to cling to him.
Also, I don’t know Bad Left Hook’s policy, but it is actually illegal to copy/paste more than a paragraph snip of an article even if you give clear credit. I’m not saying that someone is going to come over here and hassle you, but that you might want to avoid it in the future.
In Bayless I trust.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Also, I don’t know Bad Left Hook’s policy, but it is actually illegal to copy/paste more than a paragraph snip of an article even if you give clear credit. I’m not saying that someone is going to come over here and hassle you, but that you might want to avoid it in the future.
Our policy is consistent with the law. What’s the issue here? (I’m honestly asking.)
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 18, 2010 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Sorry, it is so professionally written that I mistook the link at the top for another site link.
So my bad.
I apologize to the poster. You were so good I that I mistook you.
In Bayless I trust.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
should be "site link with the whole article"
In Bayless I trust.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Was this article published elsewhere
by someone other than the author here?
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
My impression is that the poster wrote this
and I ran a Google search, and it doesn’t show up elsewhere. If it is a copyright violation, tell us and we’ll take it down.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
Yeah I ran a search too and came up empty.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 18, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
oh wait, I think I see
It’s the “via pacejmiller.files.wordpress.com” thing — that’s just where the poster got the image.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 18, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions
My article...
Just to confirm the article is written entirely by myself and the link above is simply the link for the pic attached so no violations. Apologies if that wasnt made entirely clear
You’re taking writing PEDs aren’t you? – cheating SOB.
"Yes Gina, I am a Wise Cracker"
by lcollins1 on May 18, 2010 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
My fault.
I’m sorry.
In Bayless I trust.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
It's a heckuva compliment to receive,
even if it ruffles the feathers a bit early on.
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
As I see it
While it is a strong piece and your opinions are clear and well thought out, I certainly disagree.
First. You state that Floyd is becoming the good guy here. Not in the circles I run. The reasons for such a shift may be out there, and valid (in your opinion) but it has not changed how people actually view Floyd. Before and after the Shane fight, the talk was the same. Floyd’s a punk and a ducker. He’s scared to fight Manny and a few others. And the Floyd fight was about 4 years too late, and therefore he was given no credit from anybody at the party I was at.
Is that the cost of greatness? He makes even Shane look bad, so he is given no credit for the opponent? Could be. Or could be, as I wrote on here a few weeks ago. Shane is the perfect opponent for Floyd at this point in there career.
And as I understand it, Floyd dictated a lot of the drug policy for the preposed fight with Manny. And Manny gave and gave to the ever moving time-line on testing. At some point people get sick of giving in.
I don't really feel that Mosley alone
Redeems Mayweather. In my eyes, it will take a lot to undo the damage done by the ridiculous farce that was the Marquez fight, not to mention quite a few other soft touches.
Pacquiao has fought very stern opposition over the coarse of his career. Clottey and Cotto were both viewed as possibly the hardest fights he ever took before they happened. To paraphrase Roy Jones Jr, he didn’t fight nobodies, he just made them look like nobodies.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 18, 2010 12:54 PM EDT reply actions
I agree that Clottey and Cotto where good wins but it can be argued that post Margarito fight Mosley was the toughest fight out there for both Pacquaio and Mayweather. Pac’s camp wanted no part of Mosley so Floyd won a lot of points for taking that fight.
It wasn’t out there for Pacquiao, because Mosley was tied up with the January 30 Andre Berto fight that got canceled. Pacquiao-Clottey was finalized on January 10, Berto pulled out of the fight with Mosley on January 18.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 18, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Mosley was an option after Hatton but Pac chose to fight Cotto. Mosley was arguably the tougher option for Pac and Roach clearly thought that too.
The Clottey fight was already pencilled in as you rightly illustrate but signs werent strong that Pac would have chosen to fight Mosley regardless.
I think he’d have fought Mosley this time around. They also fought Cotto instead of Mosley because that fight was far easier to make given that both are Top Rank guys. You could also easily argue that Cotto has a dedicated fanbase, while Mosley does not.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 18, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Also
Cotto had beaten Mosley not so long ago. Had Pacquiao taken Mosley, people may well have been saying “How come he didn’t fight Cotto? Cotto was clearly the better fighter”.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 18, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
There’s a case for both arguments. If he didnt fight Cotto it would indeed have been suggested he took the wrong fight like you said. Pac’s not that popular atm so more often then not he will be accused of making the wrong choices even if they arent.
Part of the ammunition for the Mosley argument is that Freddy Roach video which everyone I know has seen and was surprised to hear. If that video didn’t exist then it wouldnt look like a ducking. Also the whole thing about Mosley willing to come down to 140 didnt reflect well on Pac.
And Cotto beat Mosley before he lost to Margarito and struggled against Clottey. Mosley was the in form fighter and for both Mayweather and Pac was the guy to face at the time imo.
You should read SC's post just above.
Mosley was never an option for Pacquiao.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Agree with you that Cotto was financially the right fight to take for both Pac and Arum at the time. Mosley was the tougher fight though.
Part of the point of my article though is that when your popular your choices arent under as much scrutiny. Cotto is a more than acceptable fight when Pac was loved by all. Its only with Floyds smear campaign that Pac’s choices are being judged more.
Mosley was the tougher fight though.
Perhaps not, I think that Pacquiao would have kicked Mosley’s ass.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 18, 2010 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Indeed
Good, so it can’t go any deeper – Arturo Gatti after being told he was cut to the bone
by The Midnight Rambler on May 18, 2010 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Personally believe Pac would win both those fights so dont disagree with you. However its hard to dispute that Pac’s camp felt Cotto was the easier option of the two.
They did. Roach wanted Mosley to boil down way too far in weight. Cotto they got to 145, which was no big deal. I think they wanted Shane down to 142, which would have fried him.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 19, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes
If there’s one thing I really don’t like about the Pacquaio camp it’s their catchweight demands. I have no problem with catchweights themselves, and the Cotto one was fine, but what they asked of Mosley was clearly unreasonable and designed to effectively diminish the possibility of the fight happening.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 20, 2010 6:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Didn't Roach simply say to Mosley that he wasn't interested?
They didn’t demand Mosley do anything, if I recall correctly. Mosley kept offering, they kept declining. Can’t really fault someone for saying, “No, sorry, not interested. You’ll do what? Sorry, no, not interested. You’ll do what? Sorry, still not interested.”
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Exactly.
Pacquaio stops Mosley, in my opinion. The little bastard just wouldn’t stop going at him, and if Mosley stopped fighting like he did against Floyd…. well…. it’d be goodnight Vienna.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Different styles...
Mayweather has a style where he makes you hesitant to pull the trigger because he’ll make you pay for every mistake you make. You start second guessing yourself which is really what I think happened to Mosley. That and he was looking for that one big shot again.
Pacquiao just beats you into submission with the high volume of punches he throws. I think it would be a war between the two. Mosley is as tough as they come. He has a good beard, much better then Cotto. And he has more power to boot.
IMO, I think age would be the deciding factor with Pacquiao winning in the end simply because he’s younger. Maybe a late stoppage (11 or 12th round), but nothing earlier then that, and he by no means whoops Mosley’s ass. I’d guess a decision though.
by erod on May 26, 2010 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think it would be something like Pacquaio TKO-9 or 10
Based on Brother Nazim pulling Shane out between rounds after watching him get the career beaten out of him.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
He definitely could
But I doubt he would.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 26, 2010 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Mayweather’s talent made it a farce, noone going into the fight thought it was going to be so one sided. In some rankings Marquez was #2 p4p behind Pacquiao. At the time people were surprised Mayweather wasn’t going with a easy fight first up before going after the elite fighters, he then made the #2 p4p fighter look like tune-up fight.
by CavsLebronFan on May 18, 2010 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually
Mayweather’s talent made it a farce
Marquez was above his best weight at 135, and looked awful at welterweight. He was far slower, fat, and could barely pull the trigger at all.
noone going into the fight thought it was going to be so one sided
I remember many of people predicting that this would be a complete mismatch due to the weight. From the very day this fight was signed people thought it was daft. To say that no one thought it was going to be one sided doesn’t reflect reality at all.
Marquez was #2 p4p behind Pacquiao
True. If Chad Dawson came up 2 weight classes and got his ass kicked by a Klitschko would you say it was a good win for Klitschko based on Dawson’s p4p status? P4p rankings, by their very definition, can’t be used to rate performances in this case due to the weight disparity.
At the time people were surprised Mayweather wasn’t going with a easy fight first up before going after the elite fighters, he then made the #2 p4p fighter look like tune-up fight.
I honestly have no idea who these people were. They were either delusional or didn’t really know what they were talking about. You seem to have watched the lead up to this fight on Freddie’s TV.
I’m sorry, but the fight was a complete farce.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 19, 2010 6:36 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Great post, DC.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Yay!
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 25, 2010 6:43 AM EDT up reply actions
PR-wise, the fallout of the negotiations definitely has been a swing against Pacquiao. It’s a simple narrative in the media: one man wanted drugs testing, the other refused, therefore the fight of the century was cancelled. Who’s the villain in that?
I doubt that this has affected the idolisation of Pacquiao by millions of Pinoys though. His political career might pose far more danger to that than anything boxing related
Definately
Among the people who watch boxing all the time though and i have read both sides of the story i don’t think it has ruined pacquiao’s reputation or anything but it may if the fight doesn’t get made cause he refuses to compromise on the the blood testing. However, the rest of the public will just see mayweather as the good american trying to clean up the sport.
Mayweather haters think he was being unreasonable, he agreed to a 50-50 split of the purse, he agreed to a $10 million penalty if he was over the weight limit. That’s 2 huge concessions, negotiating is about give and take. Mayweather did plenty of giving, when it was time for Pacquiao to give a little, the talks broke down.
I think Pacquiao made a big deal of the drug testing not because he is a drug user, like some are suggesting, i just think he thinks he can’t beat Mayweather so he went into the negotiations looking for a way to stop the fight happening. When he couldn’t do it with the purse share, and the weight penalty, he did it with the one thing Mayweather won’t back down on.
This time around at least the negotiating is not being done in front of the media, maybe that’ll help. But i don’t see the fight happening because i doubt Pacquiao will agree to the testing, and even if he does Mayweather has a case for wanting more than 50% of the purse, if he wants it and Pacquiao doesn’t talks could break down over that.
he agreed to a $10 million penalty if he was over the weight limit.
This is so completely irrelevant that I wish people would stop citing it as an example of Mayweather’s willingness to deal. Mayweather IS NOT going to weigh in over 147 pounds. They could make the penalty 20 trillion Mars bars and it wouldn’t make any difference. It’s a totally pointless thing to agree to.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 19, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
In addition to this
Since when were measures to enforce contractual agreements seen as being reasonable beyond the call of duty?
Clumsy wording… I didn’t sleep at all last night!
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 20, 2010 6:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreeing to a penalty isn’t beyond the call of duty, but a penalty so significant is, he catches a cold or something and he could be a pound overweight and pay as much as a quarter of his payday. To put things in perspective the penalty for the Marquez fight was $600,000.
by CavsLebronFan on May 20, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
To really put things in perspective
He had intention of making weight for the Marquez fight, that was the very purpose of the clause which forced him to pay that 600,000 dollars. It is an abnormal clause for a fight contract, and I can’t think of any other examples of it in recent years. What it essentially allowed him to do was come in over weight, and for that to be contractually acceptable.
He didn’t miss the catchweight, it was never his target.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 20, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
If he caught a cold or something he’d just postpone the fight. Getting sick like that and fighting anyway would be reckless, something Floyd is not.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 21, 2010 4:59 AM EDT up reply actions
I disagree that it was irrelevant.
PBF had just can in over the limit (albeit at 146 with a 144lb. weight limit) that everybody jumped on as Floyd getting an extra advantage over a smaller man on purpose (like he needed help in beating Marquez). Pac’s camp wanted to make sure that wouldn’t happen to them, so they asked for a huge penalty if PBF did come in overweight, which he agreed to.
The reason it’s brought up so much is because it was Pac’s out-of-the-ordinary demand. Floyd agreed to his, yet he did not agree to Floyd’s out-of-the-ordinary demand to do Olympic style testing, even as Floyd became flexible on the days.
It was 146 to 144, though. He is not going to weigh in over 147. Pacquiao and his team played a stupid hand with HEY BUD, IF YOU WEIGH IN OVER 147, $10 MILLION A POUND. Floyd and his team probably went, “LOL ok.” It was like asking him to pay $10 million if he hit Pacquiao with a cartoon sledgehammer at the weigh-in. Mayweather’s drug testing would be happening without a single question if Pacquiao agreed to it. It was real. The weight penalty was just dumb and a pointless “demand.” It was fantasy land.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 21, 2010 4:58 AM EDT up reply actions
That also goes back to the original question about who the villain and hero in this situation is. Part of the reason public opinion has changed somewhat is that the Mayweather camp has outplayed the Pacquiao camp in the media.
by CavsLebronFan on May 21, 2010 5:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Odd demands
Like the weight one, are not exactly villainous. They may have made camp Pacquiao seem a touch strange and even unreasonable, but villainous is too strong a phrase.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 21, 2010 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s not the weight penalty directly, but indirectly by Mayweather agreeing to it it gave the appearance that Mayweather was willing to get out of his comfort zone and give a little extra to come to an agreement, and then when it came time for the Pacquiao camp to come out of its comfort zone (drug testing) they wouldn’t budge even with the Mayweather 14 day compromise. So it looked like Mayweather was willing to go 90% of the way, but Pacquiao wasn’t willing to come even 10% to make the fight happen.
That’s what i mean by Floyd’s camp outplaying Pacquiao’s infront of the media. If Pacquiao’s people didn’t insist on such a big penalty that would make headlines it would have meant Mayweather had one less thing to point on the list of compromises he made. And by extension Mayweather wouldn’t have ended up looking like the good guy compromising on everything but the one detail that really mattered to him, and Pacquiao wouldn’t look like the bad guy who wanted everything to go his way.
by CavsLebronFan on May 21, 2010 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Mayweather was willing to get out of his comfort zone
It didn’t exactly put Mayweather out of his comfort zone, he was never going to come in over 147, ever. He knew it, and just said “sure, whatever” to the strange demand.
The demand made no difference to anything, whatsoever. The idea that his acceptance of it demonstrates a willingness to be reaosnable to compromise is something of a non sequitir.
(Praying that my use of non sequitir was vaguely correct!)
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 21, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions
“out of his comfort zone”… in the eyes of the media and the general public. I didn’t mean to suggest it was hard for him, in reality it wasn’t but such a big number caught headlines and that’s how it got portrayed. “Mayweather is willing to do give in on this and this and this, but Pacquiao won’t compromise on the one thing that is important to Mayweather”.
Actual reality is less important than the perceived reality.
by CavsLebronFan on May 21, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Apparently he gave in circa January
According to Roach here, at least; you can hear it starting around 6:35 and again around 8:50. He mentions that they conceded to the 14 days at first, and the Mayweather camp was a no go.
Mind you, today was the first time I’ve seen this clip.
by kingsfan300 on May 21, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Well when I heard that Mayweather was willing to agree to 14 days, it didn’t happen because Pacquiao wanted 24 days.
If the only thing they couldn’t agree on is drug testing, and on drug testing (at some point at least) they are both happy with 14 days then somebody should ask them why the fight didn’t happen.
Maybe it was misunderstanding or miscommunication on both ends? If so then maybe there is hope for round 2 of the negotiating.
by CavsLebronFan on May 21, 2010 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions
What you heard was the same thing I heard
I just think there was more to it then we were let on to know; again, I only came upon this clip because I was looking for the more recent news about Pacquiao being okay with the 14 days. It could have been a misunderstanding between both sides like you said.
Hopefully they can work it out this time around.
by kingsfan300 on May 21, 2010 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions
You might be right
I don’t really have my finger on the pulse of casual fan opinion.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 21, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
You may well be right
That Mayweather has won some sort of publicity warfare amongst casual fans, I’m not sure. If he has, I don’t feel that it is deserved.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 21, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought then and still think that Mayweather/Ellerbe/Golden Boy have run a PR circle around Pacquiao/Top Rank. If the PR battle was a fight, Floyd is up 9-0 after nine rounds, and a couple were so wide they were 10-8s.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 21, 2010 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions
I never really have any idea
How things are looking PR wise, as I don’t listen to or watch sports news, and the writing on here isn’t exactly easily effected by PR!
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 21, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Haha!
What would they then do with the Mars bars? Give them to James Toney and watch him explode?
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Or maybe;
Give them to James Toney and watch him have a light lunch…..
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
The consequence of Pac agreeing...
The consequences of Mayweather winning are really detrimental to Pac. If Pac agrees to drug tests and isnt on drugs then the suggestion that Pac lost because he wasnt on drugs might be made even if it is attributed incorrectly.
I was shocked to see Teddy Atlas suggest that Mosley may have lost because he had a blood test as Atlas argued that this is the first time for certain it could be argued he wasnt on drugs.
Even if Pac now agrees to drug tests unless he wins there will be doubts. Floyd has forever tarnished Pacs reputation unless Pac wins.
Some Mayweather fans might say that, but not all of us, including me. He is against the blood tests because he thinks he’ll lose, not because he is a drug user. He might only have one or two more fights before he retires, and he doesn’t want a loss this late in his career, he wants to go out on a series of wins.
by CavsLebronFan on May 19, 2010 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Another great article
I wouldn’t say that De La Hoya, Hatton (@140), Cotto, or Clottey are easy fights at all for anyone in the world, particularly for someone who fought at 135 for the first time just before the DLH fight.
Despite that, thanks a lot for writing full length articles. It is people who are willing to put in the time and effort to write these articles that make this a great site. Keep up the good work!
A couple comments on some of the conversations
The debate on Pac fighting Cotto instead of Mosley; no argument here, Cotto was the right fight. He beat Mosley before losing to Margarito, and Mosley had only fought once since the loss, beating a B fighter.
Clottey being a tough fight to take for Manny: I call BS here and I said it when the fight was signed; Clottey’s a B level fighter, nothing more. The only credit Pac should get for this fight is that Clottey’s a natural welterweight. He couldn’t beat a one-eyed Cotto AFTER he got beat down by Margarito!
I sort of agree about Clottey
But I would also point out the huge fight-night weight disparity which was involved. This certainly added a significant degree of challenge for Pacquiao, making Clottey more credible as an opponent.
Additionally, Clottey arguably beat Cotto, and at least came very close to it. With this in mind, why is Cotto acceptable, but not Clottey?
Finally, several analysts suggested that Clottey would be the hardest fight of Pacquiao’s career, based on his percieved strength, and undeniable weight, advantages. The Boxing Bulletin actually published a very good article on just this, which I feel is very useful for examining Clottey’s credibility as a matchup.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 20, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree that Clottey was a credible opponent and it definitely can be argued more so than Cotto. Clottey however was always a result of the failed negotiations, the backup option. Floyd’s backup option was someone that Pac’s camp avoided. It’s not a slant at Pac’s opposition but Floyd fought someone Pac wouldnt and didnt demand he fight at a crazy catchweight.
I do feel that Clottey's standing as a legitimate opponent
Will be seen as diminished by many due to the fact that he was such a big disappointment when compared to the possibility of a Mayweather matchup.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 22, 2010 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Definitely an aspect
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 23, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Stop with the 'avoided' thing.
Pacquaio could not have fought Mosley because Mosley was tied in to fight Berto. Pacquaio signs to fight Clottey, THEN the Berto fight breaks down, over a week later. It’s not like Pacquaio could have simply tag-teamed with Berto and taken Shane to the woodshed, is it?
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
This is in reference to picking Cotto over Mosley.Mosley was an option then but one that was declined. Roach did say that Mosley was too big and too good too. The interview is on youtube somewhere and the quote is in the article.
Fighting a world class guy (Cotto) over another world class guy (Mosley), especially one that he’d already beaten, doesn’t constitute ‘avoidance’, in my book.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Theres been no suggestion that Cotto wasnt a world class opponent. He also ticked a lot of boxes that Mosley didnt in that he was in an in house fighter and fighting Cotto = more money than fighting Mosley.
There is also no suggestion that Mosley would have beat Pac. I have stated that i feel Pac would beat both. But for some reason if you include Roach’s interview and their catchweight demands for Mosley Roach’s camp felt Mosley was more dangerous.
This isn’t about the actuality of whether Cotto is better than Mosley but is reference to the fact the camp chose the easier of the two in THEIR mind.
Hey, you're the one talking about Pacquaio 'avoiding' someone.
Floyd’s backup option was someone that Pac’s camp avoided.
You then said:
This is in reference to picking Cotto over Mosley.
I responded:
Fighting a world class guy (Cotto) over another world class guy (Mosley), especially one that he’d already beaten, doesn’t constitute ‘avoidance’, in my book.
So to synopsize, you claim Pacquaio ‘avoided’ Mosley, but in so doing he fought a guy that had already beaten Mosley. I’m arguing that fighting an arguably better fighter debunks the ‘avoidance’ stance you continually refer to.
This isn’t a parallel of the option Floyd had, which was Baldomir/Margarito, both for the same money.
This is getting a whole lot more money for fighting the arguably better guy, with easier negotiations thrown in too. That does not equal avoidance to me, and it’s the use of that term I have an issue with.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
My avoidance stance is because of the comments out of Pacquiao’s camp.
And these were comments before the Cotto deal was signed so it was an option.
In May Roach “I asked Shane if he could get down to 142, and he said no, I don’t think Pacquiao/Mosley is likely”
Rex Salud “Manny may be too small for Mosley if he agrees to fight at 144lbs”
And for the interview where he calls Mosley too good a fighter so we said no is circulated on youtube.
If the camps attitude was we’re fighting Cotto because he is the better fighter then fine. They were willing to fight Cotto at 145 but wanted Mosley to fight at 142. Isn’t that obvious enough to you that they clearly felt one fighter was stronger than the other.
So you suggest that your getting a whole lot more money for fighting arguably the better guy. In actuality based on Pac’s camps views. They are getting a whole lot more money for fighting the easier guy in THEIR mind.
So to synopsize, you claim Pacquaio ‘avoided’ Mosley, but in so doing he fought a guy that had already beaten Mosley. I’m arguing that fighting an arguably better fighter debunks the ‘avoidance’ stance you continually refer to.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Arguably better to whom? Just because Cotto is arguably better to you isn’t the point here.
Mosley was the better fighter to Pac’s camp.
Fighting a world class fighter doesn’t mean you don’t ‘avoid’ other world class fighters.
My avoidance stance is based on the fact that Pac’s camp felt Cotto was the easier opponent than Mosley.
he fought a guy that had already beaten Mosley
Whether or not Cotto is arguably better is not what I’m arguing. Since he had beaten Mosley, it is ‘arguable’ that Cotto was the better fighter. That’s not my opinion, that’s fact.
fighting an arguably better fighter debunks the ‘avoidance’ stance you continually refer to.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
fighting an arguably better fighter debunks the ‘avoidance’ stance you continually refer to.
Reasons to pick Cotto over Mosley:
1) Cotto beat Mosley and is therefore the better challenger.
2) Mosley is too dangerous for Pacquiao at welterweight and Cotto is a better style matchup for Manny.
If the Pacquiao camp had said they picked Cotto because of reason number 1, then yes you’re continuous self-quote would be correct. However, number 2 is the reason they picked Cotto, and this is confirmed by statements made from Freddie Roach. So yeah, they did avoid Shane Mosley.
When your reason for picking one guy over another guy is because he’s going to be the easier fight for you, then how is this not avoidance????
If you are fighting the guy who beat the guy, how can you possibly be accused of avoiding the guy?
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
I suppose styles make fights
So the guy who has been beaten can still be the harder fight, and worth avoiding.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 26, 2010 8:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Why is Cotto acceptable?
Cotto is acceptable, quite frankly, because he beat Mosley. It made him a star and boosted him in the top tier of the welterweight division (and p4p) which, coupled with the fact that most people think Margarito cheated when he knocked Cotto out, made him a highly touted opponent at that time (I don’t think he is anymore).
His fight against Clottey should have been stopped when he got cut early. It was from a butt, and I always felt the reason he didn’t was because the fight before his (also headlined by a puerto rican on puerto rican pride day) was also stopped because of an accidental butt. Because of his willingness to continue, his eye will get split the rest of his career (which might have happened anyways) and everyone thought Clottey was better than he was. Clottey lost a close decision (you can have either guy winning) to a fighter who fought with one eye basically the whole fight. He’s also lost to every top tier opponent he’s ever fought.
I asked this when the fight was signed and I will ask it again; would everyone have been happy with Pac fighting Luis Collazo instead?
I wasn't at all arguing that Cotto wasn't an acceptable opponent
I’m not even entirely sure what your point is or what your answering.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 22, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
I think he misconstrued your point.
You’re both arguing the same side of this debate. Cotto = more than acceptable opponent.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Yeah
I was thinking that, not sure what he misread but it must be something.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 25, 2010 7:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Rumor now has it that the fight will be made. Only monor details have to be resolved. I repeat—rumor.
Good, so it can’t go any deeper – Arturo Gatti after being told he was cut to the bone
by The Midnight Rambler on May 20, 2010 3:16 PM EDT reply actions
One can dream
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 20, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I remember hearing something similar the first time round, but unlike that time I won’t be getting my hopes up until they are both walking into the ring.
by CavsLebronFan on May 21, 2010 5:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes, Floyd is “the good guy” now. He is a hero for shitting on what might have been the biggest fight in a generation, by making demands he’s never made before against an opponent who – even if he took more steroids than Lou Ferrigno and Arnold Schwarzenegger combined – would walk into the ring the much smaller man. Pin a medal on his goddamn chest and then please go and pursue interests other than Boxing.
When the puerile interest of non-Boxing fans in the sport historically comes right before a wain in the sport. Floyd now looks like he might accomplish that. Once you have a large mass of fans who want their fighter to avoid fights, and cheer him on for not taking on the best, be ready for a dip.
Thanks Floyd!
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 21, 2010 9:51 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
He made the demands for the Mosley fight and it looks like he will for whomever he fights next. Mosley had no issue with the blood tests. Martinez has already stated he has no issues with the tests
His demands may be selfish but they are far from unreasonable. A fighter not taking a simple blood test appears to be the more likely to be viewed as avoiding the fight.
As a boxing fan I will be annoyed at both parties if this fight doesn’t come off but it will be Manny that we be remembered more so for being the one responsible not Floyd.
by shaykh on May 21, 2010 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Horseshit
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 22, 2010 1:28 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Strong words for a strong issue
I generally feel that the negotiations surrounding the Mayweather – Pacquiao debacle were so frought with condtradictions and difficulties that a correct interpretation of them is very difficult to achieve. Perhaps this is why people are often so heterodoxical when it comes to the debate concerning the nature of the various demands.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 22, 2010 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Mayweather/Pacquiao
negotiations are like a Rorschach test for the sports fan. You see what’s inside your own head, and not much more.
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
by misterjonez on May 23, 2010 3:42 AM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
What a great
post misterjonez. Much appreciated from here at least!
by Don From Prov on May 24, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Precise, concise, poignant.
Good work, jrok. lol
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
I know, right
It’s completely horrible when your sport gets new fans. I mean, particularly when they care about steroid testing. I think puerile is really the perfect word to describe the entire issue of PED’s, honestly. Boxing was way better in the old days.
Floyd doesn't give a hot damn about "steroids"
This was just a negotiating tactic that got out of hand.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Yup
Floyd told me the exact same thing when I talked to him. “I don’t give a hot damn about steroids, I just don’t want to fight that Pacquaio guy.”
And the author of this post told me that Stanozolol turned James Toney into a power-punching killing machine. And pigs will fly.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 22, 2010 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
lol
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
jrok, do you honestly not believe that public perception of Manny Pacquiao has become more negative in light of these events, and whether you personally believe it or not Floyd has ‘appeared’ the more reasonable.
It may have been a negotiating tactic that got out of hand but it only got out of hand because someone refused to comply with what was a simply demand.
Make up your mind… was it a “simple demand” or is Floyd saving the sport from the howling pit of drugs that it has become.
Look, if Pacquiao is spooked by needles, it’s not exactly the sort of thing that is easy to keep under wraps. That area of the world is reknowned for superstition when it comes to needles. Vaccination drives are ordeals throughout Asia Minor, and it’s well known that Pacquiao blamed his loss to Morales on having his blood drawn.
Is it a rational fear? No but, especially in sports, superstitions are rarely rational or even logical. It was a fine point that started a negotiations war. I’m guessing the money wasn’t as “done” for either side as they lead on… “Oh you want special drug-testing? Okay that’ll cost you 8%.”
Or maybe he’s on the juice. Hell, maybe they’re BOTH on the juice, but Floyd knows his juice can slip WADA standards. WADA “Olympic style testing” sounds really impressive, until you realize how few athletes it has actually caught compared to estimates of abuse in various events.
Anyway, the worst part of all this nonsense is how it draws otherwise disinterested “boxing fans” out of the woodwork, so they can play Armchair Shrink, Fake Sports Medicine Guy, and Moral Yoda and wax endlessly about who are the “good guys” and the “bad guys.” For these sorts of people, boxing is only interesting in the same way that Pro Wrestling is; as a soap opera where they can try to divine hidden agendas and gab like schoolgirls about who is ducking who.
They are easy to spot because they are absolutely fixated one, single fight that likely won’t even happen, and appear out of the mists to rehash old details that have been already been recycled a hundred times. And then they say “ah, but here’s my spin on it,” as though they were Thomas Hauser. They compare James Toney’s drug use to Margarito’s plastered inserts, because they don’t know enough about the sport to realize how absurd it would be to say that Toney’s fists present much of a danger to anything that doesn’t come deep-fried or in a “Jumbo Pack.” But that doesn’t matter either, because all roads somehow lead back to the Ballad of Floyd and Manny and Drugs. All conversations have a Floyd and Manny dimension that they will gladly yammer on about. Boxing is secondary. They won’t talk boxing, because they don’t know or care much about it. But if the Floyd and Manny show is on? They crank up they radio and sing along. They aren’t fans of Boxing. They are fans of Soapboxing. That’s why revealing the details of the negotiations the way they did constituted taking a dump on the sport. It (temporarily) attracted all the windbags, schoolgirls and into Cosa Nostra, and sucked the air out of the biggest fight in a generation.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 26, 2010 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
Well said
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 26, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions
It has been going on for over a year now, all this soap opera horseshit. “Who is the bad guy? Who is the good guy? Was the esteemed Dr. Paulie Maligaggi right when he accused Manny of using drugs?”
For those who are still confused about all of this, let me break it down for you:
1) The lawyers are the bad guys.
2) The boxers are the good guys.
3) Paulie Malignaggi is a moronic jackass.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 26, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
Quality.
I like Paulie, though.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
I think I love you.
Rec’d.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
In all seriousness
I’ve never once said that I agree with Floyd, I’ve never once said that I think Manny is taking Steroids. Never. Not once. I have never given my opinion on the matter at all. And just so you know, I don’t necessarily agree with what Floyd is doing.
And just for the record, I have never talked about James Toney taking Stanozolol and becoming a killer. I mentioned James Toney failing two PED tests and people thinking that was ok, and I mentioned that hypothetically Steroids are effective in boxing. We have gone back and forth on the second point, and agreed to disagree. I have never even said the word Stanozolol. Ever. So don’t put words into my mouth.
Also, my only comment above all of this, before you insulted me, was that it was a pretty weak argument to say that Pacquaio was not fighting the best. Because I think that he has done everything you would want him to do in moving up in weight.
I have no issues with a scientific discussion where we make logical arguments. The first part of your above post is fine and reasonable. Our back and forth on the effectiveness of steroids last thread was fine, even though I don’t agree with you.
But I have big problems when your arguments are opinion stated as fact “Floyd doesn’t give a hot damn about steroids”, and completely untruthful ad hominum attacks.
I really couldn’t care less about whether or not you think I am real boxing fan, or merely a fan of soapboxing. It isn’t something that makes me lose sleep.
But the fact that you seem to believe that merely having a public discussion about PED use in boxing is bad for the sport is mind boggling. While I feel terrible that having Floyd Mayweather take a stand on PED’s has caused your life so much discomfort (after all you have to deal with people like shaykh and I coming in and ruining your sport), I am sure that you will survive, and so will boxing. I don’t really see how more eyes and interest will hurt anything. At the end of the day the fight will happen, or it won’t. I don’t see how the public discussion affects anything.
If Floyd fights Manny, that is a fantastic fight, whatever the terms. If Floyd fights Sergio Martinez, that is another fantastic fight. At the end of the day, isn’t that what matters? Why even read the comments if you have so much disdain for this type of article?
I wasn't even talking about you
“shaykh” had mentioned James Toney several times on his other post “Why Everything is About Manny Floyd and Drugs Don’t We Forgive Margarito?.”
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
What is it about PED talk that ruffles your feathers so much? Please feel free to quote when I stated ‘Toney is a killing machine’ as you put it. I stated that both steroid use and loaded gloves have the ability to cause further damage to an opponent and are both cheating.
And as for me making up my mind. Feel free to read what I have written throughout which is whilst Floyd may not have the intentions to improve the sport, the consequence is that effective drug testing does improve the sport. Ends essentially justify the means.
WADA isn’t perfect but is certainly better than the current standard of testing in boxing.
And I could care less whether you feel I am a genuine fan of boxing or not. I take an interest in the fights themselves and additionally what goes on outside the ring, such as the buildup like this one and issues affecting the boxing world such as improved drug testing. If those additional facets are of no interest to you then you shouldn’t bother yourself with articles that discuss them.
So far, I’ve seen you take and interest in one potential fight (Floyd and Manny), ponder why the boxing public doesn’t forgive Tony Margarito, compare James Toney’s "enhanced" and thoroughly bloated corpse to rocked up gloves, use words like "moaning" to describe people who thought Mayweather fighting and old blown-up featherweight Marquez was a joke, talk about Pacquiao’s "dwindling reputation" and basically come off sounding like you know very little about the sport you woke up one day and decided to write about. That doesn’t mean you’re a bad person, or even a bad writer. But it doesn’t lend any weight to your ideas here. It’s just more platitudes and gossipy soap opera stuff.
"Floyd Mayweather is winning the PR war." Who cares? Well, PR people care, I suppose.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 26, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
This is what “shaykh” had to say about James Toney on that otehr posting:
The same is true of Stanozolol which is the drug Toney (twice) and Vargas used. It causes strength gain without water retention or excessive weight gain. Something which brings hugely unfair advantages to both mentioned fighters and again it gives a fighter the ability to inflict damage he would not be able to do in a normal circumstance.
Since he used Stanozolol to move up in class, James Toney has inflicted plenty of damage on extra large Pizzas, not his opponents.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Your quote, to me
“And the author of this post told me that Stanozolol turned James Toney into a power-punching killing machine. And pigs will fly.”
“shaykh” wrote the post. You and I are just commenting on it.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
And honestly, I’m not gonna comment on this thing anymore. Anyone who can write the sentence “It causes strength gain without water retention or excessive weight gain” and then use Toney and Vargas as examples without a shred of irony – or even a winking “I know, bad example!” – doesn’t know who Toney and Vargas are. Probably just saw their names on a list of drug users and counted it as “research.” Might as well let the soapbox preachers shout themselves hoarse about their cause-celebre for awhile and then disappear back into woodwork.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 26, 2010 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Vargas looked pretty damn fit with little fat going into the DLH fight and that is the one where he tested positive.
But I do see the irony behind Toney.
It’s not that he puts Vargas in there, it’s that he puts Vargas AND Toney in there without pointing out the massive differences between the two. By doing that, he’d be admitting that the postive effects of some of these drugs and hormones and the danger they may pose is not so cut and dry. But I’m fairly convinced that he didn’t point out the difference because he didn’t know there was one, and couldn’t tell James Toney from Tony Thompson.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
by jrok on May 26, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Damn, Tony Thompson is on teh juice? Must all my heroes fall?
by The Boxer Rebellion on May 26, 2010 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions
And besides which
I don’t care how ripped El Feroz was for that fight. Regardless of his Superman Popeye Spinach, Vargas still got his ass kicked.
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
pac-man hasn’t been taking “easy” fights…he’s taken fights that were the biggest to be made at that juncture. DLH, Hatton, Cotto…..all guys that on paper were good….Pacman just f’ing dusted them.
Gatti. Dekkers. Pele. Aoki. Kang. Vanderlei. Basillio. Harry Greb.
by theworldsoldestsport on May 23, 2010 2:32 PM EDT reply actions
Yup.
That’s what I saw too.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
remember all the talk about clottey’s too big, the conventional wisdom was that cotta was too strong…..blah blah…Pacman’s just phenomenal in the ring.
Gatti. Dekkers. Pele. Aoki. Kang. Vanderlei. Basillio. Harry Greb.
by theworldsoldestsport on May 23, 2010 2:32 PM EDT reply actions
Pacquaio a villain, nice try!
All Pacquaio has done is fought the best.All this talk of blood teting is so lame. If the truth be told I would bet that somehow Mayweather found out that Manny doesnt like giving blood and has been using that to find reason to duck him, bad mouthing Manny the whole time, it isnt like Floyd hasnt ducked people most of his career anyway.
Floyds line of"I just want tobe on an even playing field" bull crap! thats why he paid $600,000.00 to Marquez cause Floyd came in overweight, against an already much smaller opponent.Even playing field Ha!
While on the money subject, why do you think Floyd didnt want to pay the $3000,000.00 to fight for Mosleys belt? Simple he would have to make a mandatory defense at some point and he wouldnt be able to make up his own rules to duck the guy and save face at the same time, like he is doing with Manny.People on here say that Manny ducked Mosley by fighting Cotto, lets see Cotto beat Mosley,why would he fight the loser? I never heard of that before.
If Mosley wouldnt have gotten starsruck and knocked Floyd out I would bet the farm that the fight Mosley-Pacquaio would already be a done deal.
How about this Mayweather-Pacquaio at 140 in a 16 foot ring,they can take blood between rounds if they want, Mayweather couldnt go 8 before he would be done.
Also Mayweather v.s. Martinez would be a good fight and it would be at 154 not 160 like someone posted earlier.All this nonsense about Manny being the one not wanting to fight is crazy, he has always been willing to do whatever the commisions have wanted
Regardless of whether you individually believe Pac to be the hero or villain, its hard to argue that public opinion towards him is significanly more negative to him than this time last year.
On that Marquez payout your correct, but thp0344 makes a good point when he states that Pac’s camp demanded $10million if Floyd came in over 147. I agree it was never going to happen but anyhow an agreement was made for a simply and unusual request.
Floyd makes a request for random blood tests,an unusual request but not one that anyone should have a problem with, and other than Pac nobody does have a problem with it, and Pac declines it. Demands are always made which aren’t neccesarily demanded by Commissions. This was a simple thing like ring or glove size and Pac’s refusal to engage in it hasn’t helped public perception of him.
Regardless of Floyd’s original reasoning for bringing it up it certainly doesn’t help Pac’s position when other fighters are showing their willingness to engage in testing to make the sport fairer. Why would Pac avoid doing something which is inherently good for the sport?
Regarding Mosley’s belt. Floyd could simply have vacated the belt afterwards if he wanted to, especially if he is targeting 160. He wasn’t interested in the belt so didn’t pay the sanctioning fee imo. Who exactly would he be ducking if he won that belt?
On that Marquez payout your correct, but thp0344 makes a good point when he states that Pac’s camp demanded $10million if Floyd came in over 147. I agree it was never going to happen but anyhow an agreement was made for a simply and unusual request.
There is a big difference between agreeing to an increased penalty for breaking the terms of a contract, and inserting more terms into said contract.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Why would Pac avoid doing something which is inherently good for the sport?
Why should Pacquaio bow to demands made by his opponent?
Floyd Mayweather is NOT a boxing commission, he is NOT a governing body, he is NOT a rulemaker in any way, shape or form. Boxers should not be at liberty to make up their own rules, no matter how ‘honorable’ those rules seem afterwards.
Manny wasn’t ‘wrong’ to want to adhere to the rules in place, the accepted standards, the procedures and techniques that have been in place for years and that he is familiar with.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Why should Pacquaio bow to demands made by his opponent?
Why did some of Pacquaio’s opponents give in to catchweight demands from his camp?
A catchweight is just an agreed weight that doesn't necessarily adhere to weight class divisions.
I don’t like them, but an agreed weight of 134 is just as valid an agreed weight as 147, or any other number you can pick. If that’s what they agree, then, well, that’s what they should do.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
A blood test is a better way to ensure the fighters are following the rules of the commision.
Obviously, there is a rule that states that using steroids and HGH is cheating. Because of the evolution of these drugs, simple urine tests do not detect most of these drugs now. Blood tests are neccesary to detect these drugs, which is what Mayweather wants to “ensure a level playing field.”
Honestly, though, this argument and your argument is splitting hairs. Pacquiao demands catchweights, fight venues, and, once, crazy penalties for being overweight. Mayweather demands fight venues, steroid tests, and sometimes an absorbant amount of the purse. They both have major flaws because they BOTH are used to making the rules when setting up their fights. They BOTH are the reason the fight has not been made yet.
Those demands are such different things that it hurts
If I demand soup, a hat, and some marbles it’s hardly the same as you demanding gold, women, and a helicopter. (No idea where those examples came from)
But I totally agree with your conclusion.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 26, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Regarding Mosley’s belt. Floyd could simply have vacated the belt afterwards if he wanted to, especially if he is targeting 160. He wasn’t interested in the belt so didn’t pay the sanctioning fee imo. Who exactly would he be ducking if he won that belt?
Why on earth would you expect Floyd Mayweather to pay a large sanctioning fee to attain a piece of decorative leather if he only planned to vacate it afterwards? I’m beginning to doubt your sanity, to be honest.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Why on earth would you expect Floyd Mayweather to pay a large sanctioning fee to attain a piece of decorative leather if he only planned to vacate it afterwards? I’m beginning to doubt your sanity, to be honest.
Eh, he’s done it before. He did it with Oscar’s belt, but Oscar had the green belt, and Mayweather’s in love with those stupid green belts.

Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on May 27, 2010 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Floyd makes a request for random blood tests,an unusual request but not one that anyone should have a problem with
Except of course, if you have a problem with it. If you ask me to drink a neat Scotch, and I refuse because I don’t like the stuff, that doesn’t make me ‘wrong’ in the eventuality that no-one else in the room would mind a sip. The only people that have a problem with something are the people that, (you guessed it!!) have a problem with it. Just because from your point of view it’s all ok and dandy doesn’t mean he should simply accede to it.
This was a simple thing like ring or glove size
Ring/glove size are negotiated or stipulated for every fight. In the eventuality that glove size isn’t pre-agreed, the practice is to simply revert to traditional and conventional gloves. Since the drug testing issue wasn’t pre-agreed, shouldn’t Floyd have adhered to the drug-testing procedures already in place, that had been good enough for every other fight in his career?
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Look at which point i was replying to for the WBA belt. The comment received was that by not fighting for the belt Mayweather was ducking his mandatory. The reply i gave was a sarcastic one about vacating if he needed to duck. The reason he didnt pay the sanctioning fees is he didnt care for the belt imo. Senchenko is now full WBA champ to illustrate its meaninglessness to you.
This isn’t drinking scotch. And the reasons Pac has come out with don’t really add up. Scotch has no benefit for anyone, random blood testing is a good thing on the whole. Regardless of Floyd’s intentions he has argued that the drug testing procedures aren’t good enough. The fact is that is true even if it for self gain. No-one can dispute that OST is an improvement on current testing, so it naturally seems wrong when you reject something that is better. Fair enough it isn’t a regulation but rationally it is a good suggestion no?
And that ties in with your question of why Pacquiao should meet the demands of his opponent. It hasn’t been presented as obeying the demands of his opponent, rather it has been portrayed as a rejection of improved testing. And before you jump on the Mayweather doesn’t care, I agree with you and stated as such in the article. He has found an issue which Pac doesn’t like and milked it because Pac said no. Not liking needles doesn’t cut it nor does ‘he is big and I am small.’ And Roach denouncing the use of OST certainly was a poor move.
As for the insertion and penalties for contract. No contract has been signed yet so it isn’t an insertion on an existing contract. It is setting up the conditions for which a contract can be signed.
random blood testing is a good thing on the whole.
In your opinion. Sanity isn’t statistical, despite the efforts of the tabloids to teach us so. In your opinion, blood testing is a good thing; In Manny Pacquaio’s it weakens him. Since Manny Pacquiao doesn’t give a flying fig about your opinion, and only his opinion and his sensibilities count when making his mind up on things, it doesn’t really matter whether you think blood testing is a good thing. Different people, different beliefs, different superstitions, different conclusions.
Fair enough it isn’t a regulation but rationally it is a good suggestion no?
So is restricting all cars to do no more than 60 miles per hour, if purely done for safety purposes. Or, dare I say it, banning boxing altogether since the aim of the sport is to physically hurt another man. Not all rational suggestions are justifiable in the grander scheme of things. Floyd Mayweather dictating terms to another fighter is what is unacceptable to me. If the powers that be had demanded it and THEN Pacquiao turned it down, then I’d agree with you.
It hasn’t been presented as obeying the demands of his opponent, rather it has been portrayed as a rejection of improved testing.
According to whom? I suppose I’m imagining the personal slurs on Manny Pacquiao made by Floyd Jr, Floyd Sr and Roger Mayweather, am I? This originated as an attack on Pacquaio, and Floyd then attempted to make it more PC by turning it into a ’let’s clean up the sport’ initiative.
As for the insertion and penalties for contract. No contract has been signed yet so it isn’t an insertion on an existing contract. It is setting up the conditions for which a contract can be signed.
Terms of contract: Gloves, ring, location, weight etc.
Financial penalties for breach of contract: Agreed figure for non-compliance to agreed terms.
Floyd agreeing a figure for coming in overweight is NOT justification for attempting to add new terms into the body of the contract.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Terms of contract: Gloves, ring, location, weight etc.
Financial penalties for breach of contract: Agreed figure for non-compliance to agreed terms.
Floyd agreeing a figure for coming in overweight is NOT justification for attempting to add new terms into the body of the contract.
I should explain, probably.
Term: Weight limit (Level 1). Agreed in main body of contract. Carries a penalty for non-compliance (Level 2). This constitutes two separate negotiations, one of which is derived from the other.
Term: Glove size (Level 1). Agreed term in main body of contract.
Term: Drug testing (Level 1): NOT agreed in main body of contract. Would carry with it a penalty for non-complince, which would be negotiated (Level 2).
In effect, as long as Mayweather didn’t breach the terms of the contract (ie- weight) then the level 2 consideration (penalty/money) becomes non-applicable, and therefore non-comparable to the insertion of an unprecedented, inflammatory Level 1 clause.
I’m sure someone more well versed in legal stuff could do a better job of explaining my point in an academic way, but I think that kind of covers it.
Now, Tweek, boxing is a Man sport. There is nothing in the world more Man than boxing. It is Man at his most Man. So when you spar with Ned here, just dig deep into that most Man part of you. (Uncle Jimbo, South Park: Tweek vs Craig)
Damn both of these guys.
I just cannot put into words how badly it pisses me off that we have not just the two current best P4P fighters in the same weight class at the same time, but arguably two of the best boxers OF ALL TIME in the same weight class, in their prime, in perfect position to set up on paper, one of the biggest fights OF ALL TIME…and ten times more words have been written about the PED situation than the potential matchup.
I remember when negotiations were starting to fall apart the first time, and either SC or Brick wrote a long post to the effect of, “this fight needs to happen now, or it just won’t be the same,” and I remember disagreeing, thinking that as long as the fight got done, it would all come out in the wash. And while that might still be the case, I have to admit that my excitement about the fight has been diminished. What a real shame.
As far as villains and heroes go, I will say this — if Manny winds up fighting Margarito rather than Floyd, I’m never going to forgive him or Bob Arum. Period.
by The Boxer Rebellion on May 26, 2010 8:22 PM EDT reply actions
I’m never going to forgive him or Bob Arum. Period.
He will be remembered terribly if that happens.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 26, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions
So I see Pacquiao has accepted the 14 day cut off. And wants it 50-50. Can somebody remind me exactly what was the reason he turned down those exact same terms months ago?
If a man ain't found something worth dying for. He ain't fit to live.
I wish I knew!
Maybe someone has shot Koncz, or Arum’s phone is broken so he can’t spew crap to Manny.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 26, 2010 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe Manny doesn’t have the same fear he had months ago.
If a man stops drinking and lets some time pass by, eventually he will be able to pass a sobriety test.
If a man ain't found something worth dying for. He ain't fit to live.
by Violent Demise on May 26, 2010 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Very true
A sobering thought.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 27, 2010 6:17 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m thinking they are accepting it now because they know Floyd is going to ask for more money since he outperformed Manny on the PPV front. So now they can blab about how Floyd is not trying to make the fight because he wants more money and they are giving in to his demands for blood testing AKA Floyd = bad guy who doesn’t want to fight, Manny = good guy who is caving into Floyd’s demands.
Didn’t they realize how rare it is that they got Floyd to even agree to 50-50 the first time??? That is what really convinced me that Mayweather was serious about getting this fight done.
Exactly. Some people just rather ignore the facts right in front of them and continue to blame Mayweather. Well in reality it’s Pacquiao who’s playing games.
If a man ain't found something worth dying for. He ain't fit to live.
by Violent Demise on May 27, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, to be fair...
I don’t completely blame Pacquiao because Pacquiao will lace up the gloves against anyone; including Mayweather, he’s a fighter ( or Boxer, to be technical ) afterall. All the harm is being done thanks to Freddie Roach opening his jibs. ( refer to the infamous Fighthype video on Youtube when Freddie is asked about Shane Mosley as well his agreement to USADA testing )
Top Rank i.e. Bob Arum knows that this fight will be the biggest fighter ever in the sport of Boxing. So giving the fans what they want too soon will be bad for business. So it’s best to wait it out, stir controversy amongst fans; both Pacquiao & Mayweather alike.
Pacquiao can go on to fight Margarito; win, Mayweather can move up and fight Sergio. However, my only gripe about Mayweather fighting Sergio is will the move up in weight be too much for Mayweather’s small frame? Afterwhile moving back down to 147 within 8-10 months, having a fight with Pacquiao. Could that set into motion the first stage of the Roy Jones Effect?
I do realize that it completely depends what catchweight Mayweather agrees to if the Sergio fight even comes to fruition.
…That and Mayweather isn’t dumb, I’m sure he’ll take a year off to recover and get back into fighting shape, but will that time off be the end of Pacquiao’s career?
The reason I say this is because Top Rank & Freddie Roach are known for preying on beaten fighters to boost revenue for their company.
"Okay, I stay clever like Mayweather, will lay leather 'til your face sever, one of the greatest ever." -- Big Daddy Kane
Floyd Mayweather, Jr. fan since 7/12/97 — 41-0-0 (25 KOs)
Floyd Mayweather, Jr. Hitlist: Manny Pacquiao, Sergio Martinez
If Mayweather’s next fight is Martinez at 160 and he wins, and Pacquiao fights Margarito next (I can barely say that last bit with a straight face), Mayweather-Pacquiao will never happen.
If Mayweather beats a legit fighter at 160 he would instantly become the p4p king on every list on the planet, people would then start talking about where he belongs on the all time p4p ranks. Right now everyone considers Mayweather-Pacquiao as the best of the best, a level above the rest of the boxing world. Well if Mayweather becomes a champ at 160 he’ll create a whole new level that will just be his.
And most importantly there is no way he agrees to 50-50, in this hypothetical situation where he beats Martinez at 160 and is the p4p king he will demand 60-40 at least. In fact i have a feeling he’ll want more than 50-50 now after Mosley, if he beats Martinez too he won’t agree to the same purse split as he did before, and if the Pacquiao camp wouldn’t agree to a fight where they got 50%, they won’t agree to getting 40%.
And if Mayweather is a 160 champ there will be less interest in a Mayweather-Pacquiao fight, it certainly won’t have the same status it would have now. The reason it’s so big now is people give Pacquiao at least a chance of winning, if Mayweather can beat Martinez then he’ll beat Pacquiao 12 rounds to 0.
I could see Mayweather retiring if he became a champ at middleweight. I mean what else could he possibly achieve.
by CavsLebronFan on May 28, 2010 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
If Pac beats Foreman say, he can still be a draw.
Well as a result of the Mosley PPV figures Floyd is demanding a higher split, hence Pac’s camp sudden stunt to agree to the 14 day cut off which has been taken off the table.
Arum knows Pac can lose to Floyd, so he’s gonna get two more fights out of him beforehand. Margarito would be disastrous PR wise but would do well money wise.
PR wise for Pac it is better if Foreman beats Cotto. Cotto II would get numbers still but not respect. If Foreman wins, hes on the map and Pac can step up in weight again and make it eight weight classes with a win. He beats Foreman the public will still rate him and still believe he is capable of beating Floyd.
It can be spun to be a comparable to Floyd stepping up to fight the likes of Martinez. Floyd I believe will take the fight and make it his final one, and essentially it will happen when Arum’s made as much out of Manny as possible. There will then probably be compromises on cut offs and purse, compromises which don’t serve Arum’s agenda at this moment in time, but will do later imo
by shaykh on May 28, 2010 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
WTF?
Good post, btw. However, beside from that. I don’t see how Pacquiao-Foreman at 154 can in anyway be spun to match Mayweather-Martinez for the lineal strap at 160.
I can understand that people still dislike Mayweather and due to that won’t give the man the credit he rightfully deserves. That alone is enough for Pacquiao to overshadow Mayweather in the eyes of the casual sports media.
Even though, I believe, Mayweather’s performance over the TRUE #1 Welterweight; Shane Mosley, has definitely turned some heads on those who doubted Mayweather’s ability to fight back.
"Okay, I stay clever like Mayweather, will lay leather 'til your face sever, one of the greatest ever." -- Big Daddy Kane
Floyd Mayweather, Jr. fan since 7/12/97 — 41-0-0 (25 KOs)
Floyd Mayweather, Jr. Hitlist: Manny Pacquiao, Sergio Martinez
You speak truth..
"Okay, I stay clever like Mayweather, will lay leather 'til your face sever, one of the greatest ever." -- Big Daddy Kane
Floyd Mayweather, Jr. fan since 7/12/97 — 41-0-0 (25 KOs)
Floyd Mayweather, Jr. Hitlist: Manny Pacquiao, Sergio Martinez
Spun in a sense that its similar to Floyd taking a title in yet another weight class. Both would be seen as achievers and both would be viewed as taking tough fights. Yuri Foreman if he beats Cotto boosts his reputation,he is a natural light middle and unlike Cotto hasn’t been beaten by Pac already. All these reflect well if Pac takes the fight, even at a catchweight. Cotto following Margarito would be a PR disaster for Pac. Foreman would be a fairly succesful step in comparison.
When is the Manny/Floyd fight anyway?
I want to set my DVR.
First, I’m going to load my gloves and shoot up some steroids or inhale a few PED’s.
Don't forget to spit your mouthpiece out
If you get in any trouble.
"All the time he's boxing, he's thinking. All the time he was thinking, I was hitting him." - Jack Dempsey
by Drunken cutman on May 27, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions
ahh.. this is what I love about this site.
a lot of back-and-forth debates, a lot of valid points for each side.
Agreed. I used to do all my sports debating on Yahoo Sports…it’s easier to fit in over there if you have a 2 digit IQ. SB nation is great.
by CavsLebronFan on May 28, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions
CLF:
If Floyd fights Martinez and Manny fights Margarito—
Then Floyd wins and Manny loses big time. …
Not necessarily the fights but the public perception of who, for the moment, is real.

by 



















