Navigating Boxing's Alphabet Titles Part 2: The WBC
World Boxing Council (WBC)
The WBC split off from the WBA back in 1963. Because of the way the WBA was structured, U.S. interests dominated the organization despite it supposedly having become a world organization. Boxing leaders from 11 countries, including the British Boxing Board of Control and the predecessors of the EBU, decided to start a boxing organization that would have a more even distribution of its rankings and champions. Because of this history, the WBC remains comprised by a number of smaller federations, some of which have been created as the organization rolls along, including the EBU, the BBBoC, the Central American Boxing Federation (FECARBOX), the NABF and about a half dozen other organizations.
The WBC has been synonymous with its president, Jose Sulaiman, for over 30 years now, which can be both a good and bad thing. If you've ever watched the WBC's absurd convention slideshow on Suljos, you'll know that the WBC prides itself on being the innovators of the alphabet organizations. This means that they have been among the first to institute such positive changes as standardizing the 10-point must scoring system, instituting certain medical and anti-doping protections and eliminating the saved by the bell rule. They've also been the first organization to fully embrace the power of the internet, with both a snazzy website and a deal where they play quite a few title fights for free via live legal streaming. On the other hand, it also means they were the first body to take a number of negative or ambiguous actions (although if you ask Sulaiman, they're great things) such as adding open scoring to title fights and the institution of about a dozen smaller titles than the world championship belt, outside of even the championships of its constituent federations.
Like the WBA, the WBC can have a number of champs at the same time:
- "Regular" champion - This is the man in the weight class for the body.
- "Silver" champion - This is the WBC's new name for its interim title. Officially, the WBC is only supposed to grant interim titles when the regular champion can't fight for six months because of injury or other causes he reasonably control, but in reality, the WBC grants silver titles much more frequently than that.
- "Diamond" champion - In reality, this 'champion' doesn't mean anything other than that there's a fight the WBC wants to get their grubby little paws on. Officially, it's a pimped out belt for catchweight fights between two top ranked contenders. Really, it was just invented for the fight between Manny Pacquiao and Miguel Cotto, because the WBC wanted to get some fees and a higher profile.
- Champion emeritus - The WBC rules don't actually create a champion emeritus status, but they seem to have it anyway. If a fighter stops fighting but never loses his title in the ring, then he can come back and fight for a title there without being ranked. Currently, Bernard Hopkins (at 175), Floyd Mayweather Jr. (at 154) and Edgar Sosa (at 108) are listed as champions emeritus. This created some confusion when Vitali Klitschko came out of retirement. Oleg Maskaev was the champ and Sam Peter was his mandatory. With Klitschko getting a first crack at whoever he wanted, both fighters squabbled for the better part of a year, since they both wanted to fight Klitschko, a bigger money fight for either of them. Eventually, Peter got to fight Maskaev first and then Klitschko faced Peter, but for his trouble, the WBC installed Maskaev as an undeserving mandatory. Fortunately, he was knocked out by Nagy Aguilera before we were forced to watch Maskaev get destroyed by Vitali.
- "Super" champions - For a couple years, they had super champions. With the institution of the silver title, they seem to have very quietly eliminated super champions, which is a good thing.
- Mandatory challengers - The WBC sets title eliminators to become the mandatory challenger. Winner of the eliminator becomes the challenger. But these days, they're generally just having guys fight for the silver title, so they can get more sanctioning fees.
The WBC ratings committee is comprised of 10 people, all of whom need to come from different countries. This can be both good and bad. On the positive side, it means that guys from lesser known locations are more likely to climb the rankings and get well-deserved title shots. On the negative side, it means a lot of well-known and deserving fighters don't get ranked highly, because each person on the committee is jockeying to get fighters from his own country ranked in the top 10. The committee ranks 40 fighters in each weight class, and champs and challengers for the other organizations cannot be ranked.
Title bouts are required to have judges and referees that don't come from the home country of either fighter, and the judges and referees are selected by the WBC except in places where the local laws require certain referees and judges be used, such as in Las Vegas or California. One unique but little-known rule of the WBC is that, if requested by a champion's promoter, the challenger is grant an option to the champ's promoter if the challenger wins, unless it's prohibited by local law. This means that the champ can usually force a rematch or a title fight against someone else in the old champ's stable, as long as the fight takes place within six months of the original title fight. However, the WBC also will not sanction a fight that has an immediate rematch clause.
Champs are required to defend their titles at least twice a year, and those defenses must come against someone ranked in the WBC's top 10, unless otherwise approved by the WBC. This also differs slightly from other organizations, which generally allow defenses against anyone in the top 15. One of the two annual defenses must come against the mandatory challenger, which can either be the official mandatory or the silver titlist.
There has been at least one example of outright fraud on the part of the WBC. In the late '90's, the WBC stripped light heavyweight titlist Graciano Rocchigiani of his title and pretty much gifted it to Roy Jones Jr., who was in the process of collecting titles. They did this in direct contravention of their actual rules. Rocchigiani took the WBC to court, and won a large judgment against them which sent the WBC into bankruptcy. The only reason the WBC still exists today is because Rocky agreed to settle with the WBC for a fraction of the judgment. Considering how they almost folded for violating their own rules, one would think that they would have changed their leadership or would be more careful about following their own rules, but Sulaiman is still around, and they're still as lax at ever about following what it says in their rulebook.
Just to give you an idea of how in-depth the WBC rulebook is, the following are a few of their sillier rules:
- A champ is required to carry his belt into the ring in a title fight.
- A champ who defends for five years or 12 fights gets a special plaque, but the fighter has to pay for it to get it.
- A champ still needs to pay half of his sanctioning fees if he wants to take a non-title bout or fight in another weight class.
- All registered promoters need to buy tickets for the WBC convention, even if they don't attend (effectively raising the cost of being a promoter who can promote WBC title fights).
14 comments
|
Do you like this story?
Comments
The next one will come sooner than that
Got busy for a while, plus this was a complicated one. IBF, WBO and the Ring are easier. Probably will do one on the minor titles as well.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
Tough question is:
How can these corrupt orgs be replaced. If the top promoters decided to organize a better system, I’m sure they could do it. If they had the cooperation of the networks, so much the better.
But what would induce these entities to do so? The only thing I can think of would be for the paying public to withdraw its cash from bogus and substandard cards. I’m afraid I haven’t seen that happen with avid boxing fans. We seem to purchase and accept anything they feed us because we love the sport so much.
This is where the boxing press bares some responsibility. If major boxing writers, reporters, and bloggers urge the public to boycott the BS, it will have an effect.
It is difficult to get fans to dedicate major time in their lives to reforming a sport because there are, of course, bigger problems in the world. The time and dedication necessary must be invested by those who already dedicate large amounts of time to the sport and care to make the sport better.
There's too much of a collective action problem to get rid of them, IMO
I think there could be ways to get one title to be more important than the others. For instance, if one of them decided to tie its rankings to the Ring rankings, maybe it would make that one more important, since more often than not the champion of that organization would be the real champion. But to get rid of one, you’d need all the promoters AND all the fighters to decide that belt isn’t important, and whether we like it or not, there are always going to be promoters and fighters who want belts to be on the line (promoters so they can say it’s a title fight, fighters because they want to have a belt to hang on their wall).
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
Network Belts
I think this could be an idea I would get behind. Since the fights would be on TV the challengers for the belt would need to be big names and these belts would be desirable because the belt would mean at least the next fight would be on TV. For example, HBO’s Boxing After Dark would include title eliminators and WCB would be title fights. Also this would encourage the networks to put at least a little bit of money into the smaller weight classes for undercard fights, hopefully. There would also be more competition between Showtime and HBO to have the more prestigious belts and it could depend on the weight division.
by Waldo Rastel on Jul 26, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Just to clarify my overly wordy point:
The top promoters have the power to set up a better system but, as you point out, don’t have the desire. The only way they’d have the desire would be if it was in their financial interest. The only way I think that could happen would be if the boxing press were to lead the public to reject anything less.
In the major sports, if the governing bodies ever tried to pull the crap we have in boxing, the press/media covering those sports would never accept it and, as a result, neither would the paying public (In a way, the sports press did reject what was happening in boxing – but rather than oppose what was happening, they mostly abandoned the sport altogether – which only made matters worse).
Whether in politics, economics, world affairs, or yes, even sports, we should never believe that change is impossible. But in this case I maintain it would have to be generated by the press who cover the sport.
by geraldmcgrew on Jul 26, 2010 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions
wow this is some of the most corrupt bullshit ever
how do they get rid of these sanctioning bodies that are bleeding the sport dry?
We have a saying back home that if your coming on, COME ON!!!!
nice work
a really informative read again
I hated every minute of training, but I said, ‘’Don’t quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.'’ (Bernard Hopkins)
great post, informative, reminds me of parts of Larry Holmes’ biography, some nitty gritty, specifics about the boxing world and how it works on paper/behind the scenes.
Gatti. Dekkers. Pele. Aoki. Kang. Vanderlei. Basillio. Harry Greb.
by theworldsoldestsport on Jul 26, 2010 5:49 PM EDT reply actions

by 



















