My Vouch for Timothy Bradley and his future in the P4P rankings...
Hello everyone. Here's my vouch for Timothy Bradley. Overall, my assessment is that he has all the skills needed to be a reigning champion and has the complete package. Many will disagree or will say negative things about him. This is how I feel and here's why:
Bradley has great speed. His handspeed is above average, and though he's no Khan, he's definitely above average and probably in between above average and top of the elite as far as speed/explosivenes. Next, his footwork and footspeed are quite good, and are comparable to Khan's in my opinion. On top of that he uses his feet effectively which means he uses it to evade attacks and counter/box, and he uses it to get in or out of battle/exchanges effectively.
Bradley has decent power. Does he have KO power? Nope, but he's hurt most of the good opponents that he's been against and has knocked down Junior Witter and Lamont Peterson. He had also made Kendall Holt look like he did not want to fight, and Holt has never been the same afterward. If you want to talk about power at 140 then Randall Bailey and Kendall Holt and Ricardo Torres come into the conversation. Even though Bradley doesn't have their "pop" he is still a better fighter than all three of them, and was relentless and aggressive enough to outwork Holt, Alexander, Witter, and Peterson.
Bradley is slick. What? You mean with his headbutts? No. He has great head movement and blocks and picks off a lot of shots. He rarely gets hit flush and usually sees punches coming. His foot speed also helps him move effectively when he's being attacked and his overall sense of boxing and lateral movement helps him to defend and efficiently go straight back to attacking or countering.
Bradley can in fight. Bradley likes to take opponents on the inside and wail hooks on their body and head. Though people say his hooks are wide they also land and land often. His body attacks wear down his opponents' strength and will. His rounds 3 and 4 with Peterson were admirable because they traded body shots for those rounds.
Bradley is not a runner, he's an offensive fighter with good defense. He's quick to bring the fight to the opponent which makes me wonder why some people think "Timothy Bradley fights are boring." How are they boring? He punches in high volume, brings the fight to the opponent, punches hard enough to hurt or keep opponents honest, and usually wins on will and relentlessness as much as he does on skill and guile. I think every time he fights it's a great display of skill and fighting aggression (except for the Casamayor fight in which he was going for the one punch KO in every punch, which made him load up and not throw as many effective combinations, nor did he move his feet enough etc.).
Bradley has a high Ring IQ. I feel this is his most valuable asset and the reason I'd put him as being better or able to outdo most elite fighters between 135-147 today minus the guy who is called Floyd (mugshot!). I feel he could easily outbox, and later on outwork Khan. I feel he could out guile, out box, and out counter Manny Pacquiao. His speed will give Pacquiao trouble, and his lateral movement, his beautiful jab, and his body work/stamina would wear Pacquiao down.
Bradley has great timing. He can gauge his distance well, he can time his opponents well and the fact that he's fast also makes him able to be an accurate volume puncher.
To me, Bradley has all the tools, and despite what people say about his "boring fights/style" or "his cheating headbutts" I feel Bradley has all the tools and guile that make up "The Sweet Science" which is to "hit and not be hit." (not to KO and absorb punishment along the way). See ya!
FanPosts are user-created content written by community members of Bad Left Hook, and are generally not the work of our editors. Please do not source FanPosts as the work of Bad Left Hook.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bradley barely getting hit, and moving effectively.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl_y2EIlXT8&feature=related
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
Cool training video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebLG11s92dE
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
More Bradley...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gpI8o1WOyI&feature=relmfu
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
Another...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLMIOGyAKEQ&feature=related
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
Bradley has all the tools, and despite what people say about his “boring fights/style” or “his cheating headbutts”
You put these in quotations as if they “don’t exist”
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
Well, I don’t agree with the boring style (I think the Alexander fight was just a style clash) and though he has head butted before in fights, I don’t think it should define his career b/c he does other things, and very important things in the ring 98% of the other times. To focus on the headbutts is to ignore his being the top of the 140lb division for the last year or two and the reasons for it. That’s just me. I believe fan or no fan, objectively he should be recognized for what he brings into the ring.
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
Oh I think he’s a terrific, smart fighter who does everything fairly well at worst. But he headbutts motherfuckers and he can be pretty boring.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on Dec 22, 2011 3:41 AM EST up reply actions
and by the way
I think this is good analysis and you make several very valid, very strong points.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on Dec 22, 2011 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
Bradley is the perfect answer for Pac who will beat him. Then Pac will take a 12-18 month layoff while
Mayweather grows a bit longet in the tooth. Meanwhile, Bradley gets his retiremnt payday.
"If you sit there and watch a person take about an hour to tie his shoestrings, then you realize that whatever problems you got ain't that significant."
-- Vernon Forrest (1971-2009)
I’d say look at the styles. Before Marquez 3, Pacquiao has been carefully matched with bigger, but slower fighters that: a.) can’t box b.) have limited defense c.) and/or old d.) stamina or chin issues … the only person he fought at 140 was Ricky Hatton. To me, 135 and 140 present more dangerous opponents for Pacquiao than 147-154. I know we’re in America, and pple tend to think bigger brawn or more size/strength equals to greater threat, but smaller guys who can box or are quicker immediately take away Pacquiao’s perceived speed advantage. If you add boxing skill and lateral movement then Pacquiao’s rushes that come straightforward get offset. Think, Pacquiao couldn’t take out a gassed Shane Mosley and chased him around for 6 rounds. How would a prime top of the line 135 or 140 lb fighter who boxes and punches well handle Pac? I think it’s doable, and to add, Bradley has a higher boxing IQ. I say even Pacquiao circa Dec 2008-Dec 2009 at 140 or 147 struggles with Bradley or anyone who can really box and move at 135. Pc! Btw- Anyone wanna bet crow on it? I know I handed out some nice crow after the Peterson win. Pc!
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
pac was not able to take out mosley, as i see it, since shane was very reluctant to engage in battle. it was a similar scenario on the donaire vs narvaez..
if bradley would be able to “see”/adapt on pac’s punches then good.. remember that pac can also win on points. he is a volume puncher but each of those punches are of high quality.
well, khan could have won if he was not deducted.. but maybe his pushing was a sign of frustration to LP’s style..
"Effort without Efficiency is nonsense.." -rk mag
take a bad knockdown and two point deductions the scores change from 113-112, 113-112, to 114-114, 114-114, a majority draw. No robbery to me the way I see it. Those fights are still telling from both fighters: Pac still can’t cut off the ring or handle movement. It’s Donaire’s fault he couldn’t crack a peek a boo the Dirrell cracked Abraham’s:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6o9Up1anffo
Also, Donaire tends to fight up to the ability of his opponents. Pacquiao in general takes fights he has seriously minus the fight in between Morales 3 and the David Diaz fight (horrendous). But you gotta blame the fighters, and not on the guys who “didn’t want to engage.” Pac and Donaire had a lot to do with what happened, and they simply didn’t have the skills or motivation or the right training camp to adapt. Marquez engaged Pacquiao and Pacquiao still couldn’t handle the movement. Pc!
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
Btw- Pacquiao doesn’t have the skill to crack a peek a boo either (Clottey fight)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-Qkab5817U
And Clottey had his moments and countered Pacquiao clean and hard several times. Clottey was the only welterweight that pac fought who had boxing skills and he made pacquiao look horrible.
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
"didn’t want to engage." style is helpful when you’re enemy is a strong aggressor, but doing it until the end of the 12th round is just hopeless, for me…
"Effort without Efficiency is nonsense.." -rk mag
Pacquiao of 2011 no longer bounces on his toes, gives angles, throws punches in bunches while moving laterally… he just combines his bread and butter of the past (the ole’ 1-2 or just the 2) with that of his present (a more balanced lead left cross, better defense, boxing smarter), but none the jazz that got him into rocket superstardom in the first place. Yes he fought difficult opponents, but also you have to bare in mind Pacquiao looked like sh**, (his right hook was not a force to be reckoned with either) b/c of him, and him alone, and not just b/c of his opponent. He’s regressed from his 2009 version who wouldn’t have struggled so much wtih Mosley or Marquez at 147, and he no longer has the beastliness and endurance of the past… what’s left?
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
and like before he couldn’t cut off the ring…
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
whats left? mayweather.. their lights are dimming with years so they better make it happen fast.. :D
i dont really despise bradley, i just see pac still fresh enough to beat him.. LP and devon dont have the style as pac’s.
but if bradley would demolish khan, that may make me hesitate.
"Effort without Efficiency is nonsense.." -rk mag
you make some good points. would love to see a more active bradley in 2012. another one of his best qualities is his mental toughness/determination.
those headbutts are a big downside though… i mean, opening cuts on alexander, abregu, campbell and holt in just some of his most recent fights… when your style of fighting is consistently causing clashes of heads that open cuts on your opponent and you don’t alter your style, at what point do you have to start calling them intentional?
Well either way, boxing is defend yourself at all times. Barrera, Bhop, and now Floyd are pretty dirty fighters, but they still have fans and a following. It’s just part of the game. if it’s such a huge issue the opposition camp would warn the ref ahead of time, and the ref would/should take points away. It’s not illegal unless there’s a point deduction. Pc! A more active Bradley would be fun. I think he can beat Khan more convincingly than Peterson, however, pple will cry “but he got Peterson’s leftovers! He SHOULDA fought him before, or Khan was past his prime by the time they faced! Or Khan was already exposed!” etc. Bradley 2012 baby!
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."
Well either way, boxing is defend yourself at all times.
so it’s alexander, abregu, campbell and holt’s fault for not defending themselves better against headbutts? i guess agbeko also had a weak defense for low blows during his first fight with mares….
It’s not illegal unless there’s a point deduction.
ummmm. do you really believe this?
i do agree that bradley should be favored to beat khan with his relentless pressure and determination. and i think we can all agree that it would be better if headbutts do not play a role in the outcome!
Timothy Bradley vs. Edner Cherry (First title defense post-Witter)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yA2QVd9LKjc
"According to all the laws of aerodynamics the bumble-bee should not fly, but the bumble-bee does not know this and so flies anyway."


















