Paul Malignaggi, Nate Campbell Likely for Maidana-Morales Card
Paulie Malignaggi and Nate Campbell are likely to be headed to Las Vegas for the April 9 card on HBO PPV, main evented by Erik Morales and Marcos "Mother F'ing" Maidana in a junior welterweight contest.
Malignaggi (28-4, 6 KO) would face Jose Miguel Cotto (32-2-1, 24 KO) in a welterweight bout. BoxingScene.com's Rick Reeno reported on March 17 that the contracts were yet to be signed at that point, but the bout was agreed to in principle. It's a good little storyline fight, as Malignaggi's most memorable fight was the 12-round beating he took in 2006 from Jose's younger brother, Miguel. And really, it's not a bad fight. Paulie is still trying to get his feet wet at 147, where he debuted in December by stopping Michael Lozada in Quebec City, and Cotto showed last May that while he's not a great fighter, he's got something left in the tank as a good test in his loss to Saul Alvarez.
Another likely bout looks to be Nate Campbell coming out of a very short retirement to face prospect Danny Garcia on the same card. 15rounds.com says that Campbell confirmed he's signed a contract for the fight. Campbell (33-7-1, 25 KO) looked like absolute toast in two 2010 losses, the first coming to Victor Ortiz, which was no shock or shame, but the second coming to journeyman Walter Estrada in November, which just shouldn't have happened. Campbell announced his retirement after that fight, and I hoped that he would stick with it, but it doesn't look like that's going to be the case. We're still only a couple of years and realistically a few fights removed from Campbell filing for bankruptcy in 2008, so this might just be a necessity. Nate's a fighter, so he'll fight for his living. I still think he has a future in the broadcast booth or any other number of boxing-related jobs, but those just might not be there at the moment. I said recently regarding Ricardo Mayorga that no good comes of a fighter going on in the ring once he admits it's time to hang it up, and I really believe that. Campbell is one of the most honest guys in boxing and was very sincere in November when he admitted it was time to retire. All you can really do here is hope for the best.
Garcia (20-0, 14 KO) is a Philly prospect who was nearly upset by Ashley Theophane in February 2010 on ESPN2, but since then has scored four straight stoppage wins. Campbell's not really a junior welterweight and he's just turned 39, so I really expect Garcia to basically pick the bones of a veteran battler if this fight really happens. It's just a boxing reality. It happens every weekend, somewhere in the world.
That makes the card look like this right now, or at least these are all the rumors:
Junior Welterweights: Marcos Maidana (29-2, 27 KO) v. Erik Morales (51-6, 35 KO)
Lightweights: Robert Guerrero (28-1-1, 18 KO) v. Michael Katsidis (27-3, 22 KO)
Welterweights: Paulie Malignaggi (28-4, 6 KO) v. Jose Miguel Cotto (32-2-1, 24 KO)
Junior Welterweights: Danny Garcia (20-0, 14 KO) v. Nate Campbell (33-7-1, 25 KO)
Middleweights: James Kirkland (27-0, 24 KO) v. TBA
Is that a good enough show for you to shell out PPV money? There's nothing else on American TV that night besides the far worse Adamek-McBride show, which is also PPV.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m not ordering. I’ll much rather watch Strikeforce, and catch up on these fights later.
"Dawson was NOT a hype job. Dude schooled Adamek, beat Tarver twice (neither competitive), beat Johnson twice (once close, once a wipeout) and even beat Harding when Harding was still good. That is not hype. Those are results. I love how people see a guy lose once and all of a sudden nothing they ever did means anything. You are dead wrong."
- Dan Rafael
Yes for me.
Call me an idiot but as the fight gets closer I can’t help but think that maybe Morales knows something about Maidana. I don’t know, maybe I’m grasping at straws or maybe I’m hoping that Morales has one special fight left. Or maybe I just like Maidana and Morales enough to shell out the 60 bucks.
by glatin1982 on Mar 20, 2011 9:39 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Or maybe I just like Maidana and Morales enough to shell out the 60 bucks.
That’s where I’m at. I’d rather not, but I’m sure I will.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on Mar 20, 2011 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions
i love maidana and how he throws it down.
If anyone deserves my PPV money it’s him.
http://www.kissingthecanvas.com
"Look at this body, ... Do I look like I use steroids?"
-James Toney
by tylerrcurtis on Mar 20, 2011 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I voted no. But I’m not sure. I really like Paul Malignaggi. “The Magic Man!!!!!”
The Once and Future King
Im gusessing you
love watching some vicious KO’s when Paulie boxes ;)
Ahh im being cynical, I like the man too. Always good value
by Sweet science on Mar 21, 2011 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m an idiot when it comes to boxing PPV’s. I always find a way to convince myself to get it. No matter how awful it is. And it usually doesn’t take much. But there’s no debate for this one. I’m getting it. It’s Erik Morales. If he told me could walk through hell and not get burned, I’ll be right behind him. He asked for the Maidana fight for a reason. He thinks he can win it. And I believe him. He’s to proud a man to go out there knowing he’s getting blown out
Ditto. I'm an addict/idiot. I buy them all.
"Silence is golden when you can't think of a good answer"
---- Muhammed Ali
Can't afford them all,
but that’ the only thing stopping me. I’ll be buying this one, Guerrero, Garcia, Kirkland, et al.
There is no safety in numbers, or in anything else--James Thurber, 1939
Sky have kindly purchased the TV rights to this, so I’ll be watching it for free (subject to the standard subscription fee, which makes it not-so-free, but meh). Good couple of weeks its been for boxing on British TV: we’ve had Judah, Martinez and Bute on Premier Sports, and we’re getting Gamboa, Maidana and even the Pirog fight in the next few. Happy days.
"Occasionally, there is a boxing match that, in its demonstration of skill, courage, intelligence, hope, seems to redeem the sport - almost. Perhaps boxing has always been a sport in crisis, a sport of crisis."
by Oli Goldstein on Mar 21, 2011 3:51 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
In terms of the actual card, though – I do have my worries. I’d hate to see Morales and/or Katsidis and/or Campbell all take nasty beatings, but as far as I’m concerned those are three faded fighters up against younger, fresher and, now, more dynamic fighters. I’m not sure to what extent Katsidis fits with those three – logic says he does, but when Katsidis was previously meant to be getting old he came over here and knocked the juice out of Kevin Mitchell – but the last thing I want to see is those three all taking a right shellacking. I’ll watch, but I do have my concerns.
"Occasionally, there is a boxing match that, in its demonstration of skill, courage, intelligence, hope, seems to redeem the sport - almost. Perhaps boxing has always been a sport in crisis, a sport of crisis."
by Oli Goldstein on Mar 21, 2011 3:54 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I hate tyo see Morales back in the ring
"Silence is golden when you can't think of a good answer"
---- Muhammed Ali
Nah
This would have been borderline before, but now that I don’t have PPV access, there’s no way I’ll go out of my way to find it. The card’s not even particularly deep. I don’t see any of these fights being competitive.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
by Brickhaus on Mar 21, 2011 10:09 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Unless Guererro just doesn't show up
Which he’s been prone to do.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
by Brickhaus on Mar 21, 2011 10:10 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions

by 

























