Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Do Mike Tyson and Kostya Tszyu Belong in the Hall of Fame?

Mike Tyson's Hall of Fame induction has stirred up debate. (Photo by Darrin Bush/Las Vegas News Bureau via Getty Images)

Of the three marquee fighters headed into the International Boxing Hall of Fame today in Canastota, N.Y., I think we can all agree that Mexican boxing great Julio Cesar Chavez is a deserving honoree. And while there's also Sylvester Stallone, Nacho Beristain, Joe Cortez, Harry Carpenter, A.F. Bettinson, Jack Root, Memphis Pal Moore, Dave Shade and John Gully. But let's focus on the other "big two."

"Iron" Mike Tyson, some argue, didn't actually do enough in the ring to warrant inclusion. Same goes for Kostya Tszyu, though since he is less a controversial and polarizing figure than Tyson, the debates haven't been as loud.

What do you think?

Pros in Tyson's favor are that he was one of the greatest attractions in boxing history, a true marquee star who was globally famous and at his peak, perhaps the biggest sports star in the world. The biggest con, of course, is his actual record. He was a monster in his youth, but some argue that he was monstrous against mediocrities, while losing most of his biggest fights, to the likes of Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis, and of course the stunning upset by Buster Douglas that shook the myth of the indestructible "Iron" Mike forever. After Douglas, he was never the same. After prison a couple years later, he was really never the same, and his career ended with ugly losses to Danny Williams and Kevin McBride, the type of fighter he made mincemeat of during his meteoric rise. Tyson retired with a record of 50-6 (44 KO).

Tszyu (31-2, 25 KO) reigned as junior welterweight champion for a good while before losing to Ricky Hatton in 2005 and riding off into the sunset just shy of his 36th birthday. He didn't hang on and try to pad his record, and didn't take the depressing losses many old fighters do. He was also an outstanding amateur fighter, a true amateur great, and beat a lot of contenders as a pro. But some feel he wasn't "great enough."

Personally, I don't take the Hall of Fame seriously at all. Any Hall of Fame. It's a nice gathering every year and there's no less than a good fighter in there anywhere. Barry McGuigan is a popular target for cries of disgrace, but what disgrace? It's a building with pictures in it and everyone who has ever been voted in has felt honored. I just don't get it. I'm not wired to care about the Hall of Fame beyond being happy for the guys who get in.

But I realize some people deeply care about this stuff, and I do think the debates can be interesting. So here it is: If you'd had a vote, would you have given one to Tyson and/or Tszyu?

Poll
Would you have voted for Mike Tyson and/or Kostya Tszyu for the Hall of Fame?
Yes to both
367 votes
No to both
12 votes
Yes to Tyson, no to Tszyu
161 votes
Yes to Tszyu, no to Tyson
19 votes

559 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 63 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yes. Mayby Kostya got in a tad early as I can make a case for others who could have gotten before him. But he belongs. Tyson is a no brainer.

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 3:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Well, we’re on the exact same page.

Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."

by Scott Christ on Jun 11, 2011 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I always ask myself this question: “can you tell the story of the good and important things in this sport in this athlete’s era without mentioning them?” It’s not the whole of an answer, but I find it’s a useful quick sorting mechanism. I think you’d be hard-pressed to leave out Tszyu and it would be impossible to skip Tyson, so to me they’re both fine selections.

by Brendan Welsh-Balliett on Jun 11, 2011 3:23 PM EDT reply actions  

yes, precisely

I have felt that Tyson was bad for the sport, at least as bad for it as he was good, but you can’t talk about boxing at all and leave him out, and you can’t talk about it long and leave Tszyu out.

There is no safety in numbers, or in anything else--James Thurber, 1939

by BoxAnne on Jun 11, 2011 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kostya is one of my favourite fighters but after hearing Atlas and Tessitore on FNF saying that Tszyu probably wasn’t worthy, i analyzed his record and, to be honest, he beat a few guys who were past their best, beat a few good guys, and lost to two good guys, with the Phillips loss looking worse than the Hatton one, imo.
At forst o thought WTF is Tessitore the idiot talkng about here, but i can see where he is coming from.
Like they say, the Hall should require the highest standards for inductions.
I hate to say it but looking at his record, i think Tszyu is one of the lesser members of the Hall and probably should not be a first ballot entry.
Tyson should def be in, imo.

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 3:25 PM EDT reply actions  

So, yeah, i think they should both get in. But Tyson is the only one who should have been first ballot of the two, imo.
It’s no big deal that Kostya made it first time though. He was a very good fighter.

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to be picky, but I believe it actually is abig deal. Each year that a new recently retired guy gets in

makes it all the more difficult for a guy like Steve Collins or Davey Moore or Tony DeMarco or some Jorean or Thai great to get in. The fact is, other new guys like Oscar, MAB, maybe Camacho, maybe Hatton, will get in front of tem and then they fall farther behind allowing moire new ones to get in. I have a solution for this but I’ll save it for a Fanpost.

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

some Korean

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you.

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hall of Fames

One argument for HOF inclusion in any sport is were they the best at what they did for a given stretch. Obviously the length of that given stretch is up in the air. But in regards to Tyson, whatever the competition, he was the best in the world in the mid-80s before losing to Buster.

And of course, if you want to go with the literal interpretation of Fame, there are few boxers ever that have been as famous as Iron Mike. That’s taking it a bit far, but like Brendan said above, you can’t tell the story of boxing in the 80s and 90s without talking about Tyson.

by David Fucillo on Jun 11, 2011 3:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Not sure how someone can cobble together a reason Tyson doesn’t belong in the Hall of Fame. They would have to be pretty confused in my opinion.

Forget for a second all the particulars, like being the youngest champ in heavyweight history, or unifying the titles. For pete’s sake, look at some of the other guys in there. Like Boss Man says above, a no brainer.

Tszyu is a little arguable, I guess, but not Kid Dynamite.

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Not sure how someone can cobble together a reason Tyson doesn’t belong in the Hall of Fame.

It starts and ends with, “Who did he beat?”

Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."

by Scott Christ on Jun 11, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

He beat fellow Hall of Famers and All-Time Greats Michael Spinks and Larry Holmes.

I’m not immune to criticisms of Mike’s career, and have made a few of my own. But I think any discussion of him not belonging in the HoF swings the pendulum too far the other way.

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

His shortlived prime was electric and his presence was awsome. He was the BIGGEST thing

in boxing and his KO’s were unreal. No way he can be kept out. NO WAY.

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh I agree. But that’s the argument.

Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."

by Scott Christ on Jun 11, 2011 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

GDay Everyone

Tysons a dead set no brainer. Youngest heavyweight champ ever. Unified heavyweight champion ( was Mike the last fighter to do this? ) . 9 defences of the title he won off Berbick and probably the most exciting heavyweight of all time. He was the only fighter to KO Larry Holmes as well. As an Aussie I love our adopted son Kostya but he didnt really ever beat who I consider a prime , a grade gun world champion type fighter. Nearly every name on Kostya’s resume was past his best. I actually hold the Phillips fight against him far more than the Hatton debacle . Tszyu looked absolutely shot when he fought Jesse James Leija prior to the Hatton fight . I expected Hatton to beat him. The old " young hungry challenger v aging , past it champion " . scenario.

by JC40 on Jun 11, 2011 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here is what I said in Planet Boxing

Here is what I said about Tszyu in my book Planet Boxing::::Kostya Tszyu (31-2), fought from 1992-2005. Perhaps the most celebrated Russian fighter ever, Tszyu retired in 2005 with a deceptive 33 fights, for he had gone up against tough hombres virtually from the very start of his pro career. In fact, he beat Juan LaPorte in his fourth fight, and his second pro opponent had 33 fights. Known as the "Thunder from Down Under" because he had emigrated to Australia, he won the IBF Light Welterweight title in 1995 by stopping Jake Rodriguez in Las Vegas. He defended it successfully with his heavy hands until being upset by Vince Phillips in 1997. He rebounded by beating Ismael Chaves (40-5-3) in a WBC Light Welterweight Title eliminator, and then iced Calvin Grove (49-9) in the first round. In 1998, he beat Rafael Ruelas(52-3) in nine rounds to win another WBC Light Welterweight Title Eliminator, and then captured the interim WBC Light Welterweight Title by beating Cuban Diosbelys Hurtado (28-1) that same year. In 1999, the powerful Russian via Australia stopped Miguel Angel Gonzalez (43-1-1) to win the vacant WBC Light Welterweight belt. He then won 8 in a row including a blow out of former Mexican Legend Julio Cesar Chavez (103-4-2 at the time). During this streak, he also won the WBA Super World Light Welterweight title, IBF Light Welterweight title, and the WBC Light Welterweight crown. In May 2005, he lost his final fight when he could not answer the bell for round 12 against Ricky Hatton in Manchester, England. When one reviews his entire body of work, the only thing left is for the affable and articulate Tszyu is to receive the inevitable call from the International Boxing Hall of Fame. Oh yes, he compiled an amateur record of 259-11 before turning pro, but unlike so many amateurs today, he hit the road running and dispensed with walk-over fights.

My point is that if they waited a year or two, That would have been perfect.

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Awesome stuff thanks.

The character of a man is always proven after faillure - not after success.

by Chorongota on Jun 12, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

You hit the nail on the head with McGuigan (or even Ingemar Johansson).

The bar has been set, and I think Tyson and Tszyu exceed that bar.

by DPlainview on Jun 11, 2011 4:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Ingo

I have only seen him fight a couple of times on tape, against Patterson, i think, and i have to say i was distinctly unimpressed.
Mind you i never thought much to Patterson either, to be honest.
Liston crunched him.

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Personally, I don’t take the Hall of Fame seriously at all.

I’m not sure if you mean you don’t take the IBHOF seriously, or you mean you don’t take ranking greatness seriously?
My view is that defining greatness should be taken seriously.
I mean, fighter’s fight mainly for money, but also to find out who is the best.
And the Hall should be reserved only for the very best, imo.

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 4:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Indeed.

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I could make a case for Pone Kingpetch – 1954-1966 Chartchai Chionoi- 1960-1975 Venice Borkhorsor – 1968-1980 Samart Payakaroon-1982-1994 (Also a legend of Muay Thai boxing) Sot Chitalada – 1983-1992 Muangchai “J-Okay” Kittikasem- 1988-1999 Samson Dutch Boy Gym – 1992-2002. - Or Masamori Tokuyama (alias Chang Soo Hong) – 1994-2006 In-Jin Chi 1991-2006 Myung-Woo “Sonagi” Yuh – 1983-1992 In-Chul Baek – 1980-1990 Soo-Hwan Hong – 1969-1980 Ki-Soo Kim 1961-1969 (South Korea’s first world boxing champion).

But I would have put Yuri Arbachakov in there first because he was a pioneer of sorts given his Japanese home base—much like Kostya’s in OZ

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:22 PM EDT reply actions  

DISREGARD THOSE LINES

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:22 PM EDT reply actions  

The problem with the HoF is that it’s very political and sometimes very crazy with who it inducts (see: Jose Sulaiman and Sly Stallone). With Sulaiman, I was sure they meant to say “indicts” rather than “inducts.”

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 4:23 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

The non-fighters all made thier bones thanks to the warriors who risk(ed) their lives in the ring. That’s my point—though never a winning one—that the Hall should be restricted to those who had an immediate impact on the outcome of a fight. Trainers, corner men,referees, and boxers. Many actors and writers have their own Halls of Fame. I bet Sly has a STAR in Hollywood. They don’t need two. Who next? Dan Rafael? Gus Johnson? The BWAA has it’s own award program. I don’t need Bert Sugar in the Hall. Or Merchant? Or Suliman? Or King? Or Arum? Or maybe a Buffer. I need more fighters.

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:26 PM EDT reply actions  

They are probably going to put Lamps in there someday

To keep his disgusting buddy Larry Merchant company.

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

YUK

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Suliuman

is the most disgraceful inductee of all, as far as i’m aware.
He has done way more harm than good, as we know.
Who’s next Don King, Arum? They are sure things, i know. Ludicrous.
I tend to agree with your stance on this Boss Man.
It’s like how far do they want to take it?
Timekeepers and spit bucket holders will be next.

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

King and Arum are already in the Hall of Fame

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, right

Not suprised, but then i’m only interested in looking for listed fighter’s on their website.

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

So it seems

fighter’s have to be retired for 5 years, but not lecherous promoters and slimy sanctioning board crooks, oh no, they get the express ticket.

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

AN INFAMATIA

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I personally thought it was crazy back when Ring was ranking Tyson the #1 P4P boxer in the world (something like two or three years running, if I recall correctly). A heavyweight as #1 P4P! But, regardless of how nuts I thought it was, it still happened. Tyson was bigger than the sport of boxing for a while.

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 4:26 PM EDT reply actions  

I think part of the reason for lesser fighter’s being inducted surely has something to do with getting countries represented in the Hall.
I mean, McGuigan (N Ireland), Johannesson (Sweden), Tszyu (Russia), although, personally i think Kostya is more worthy than the former two.
I can’t think of anymore but i’m sure there are a few who maybe shouldn’t be in there.
It’s obvious that the US has produced the vast majority of the best fighter’s over the years, and i think it’s pretty obvious that some get in because of where they are from.
Would McGuigan or Johanneson have got in if they were American? Erm, gee, let me think. :)

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 5:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Also

in McGuigan’s case, i’m pretty sure his induction was partly to do wth him attracting both the Catholics and Protestants as his fans and somewhat doing his part in building peace in the country. That’s all good and something that he should be honoured for, but not in the IBHOF, imo.
The boixng Hall of Fame should be just about that – boxing at the highest level, and how good you were at it.
I like Barry. He’s a great speaker, a great man and was a good boxer, but one of the best ever? An empahtic NO, from me, i’m afraid.
He only made 3 defences, against limited oppposition, of a title he won from an admittedly very good fighter (Pedroza), but who was past his best. He then lost it to an average fighter and the Vegas heat. He only held one belt and never unified.
That does not a HoF career make, as far as i’m concerned, far from it.

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

He only made 3 defences

I should say 2 defences. He lost the third to Cruz.

by Matt Mosley on Jun 11, 2011 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like Ali, he transcended it

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 5:00 PM EDT reply actions  

This is the Hall of "Fame", after all

You could maybe make a good argument that no boxer in history was as famous as Tyson was at the height of his career. Maybe not even Ali.

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Anyone who can sing "One night in Bangkok"

Like Tyson did, deserves to be in.

by Phill on Jun 11, 2011 5:08 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I don't know the criteria

for induction into the BHOF. I think that Tszyu was finished by the Hatton fight, but during the 1990s, he was very powerful, fast, skillful, and his footwork was impressive.

Tyson was a phenomenon. He was small, even by1980s HW standards, but he in addition to his power he was incredibly fast and versatile. I can’t really think of another HW who had such a successful body attack, and who also had the uppercut Tyson had.

by DrRck on Jun 11, 2011 7:31 PM EDT reply actions  

In an earlier, failed post

I mentioned that I regard Tyson as one of boxing’s greatest might have beens. He may have burned out early, because of his problems with significantly taller fighters, but who knows?

by DrRck on Jun 11, 2011 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tillis, Douglas, Lennox, yeah. As long as the tall guy could box AND punch, Mike was going to have problems. Even a fighter like Golota, who wasn’t especially huge, could have potentially given Mike some trouble in their fight… if he didn’t have a heart the size of a dime and willpower like a melted marshmallow. Holmes minus four or five years also probably would have handled Tyson.

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Watching that Holmes fight

to me is like watching a movie, and expecting the ending to be different. Holmes was beautifully minimalist, IMO, and after a few more rounds could have finished Tyson.

Apropos of nothing, the most horrible fight I’ve even seen only once, and have never been able to bring myself to endure a second time, is the Holmes-Ali fight.

by DrRck on Jun 11, 2011 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that Holmes-Ali fight is horrific. How Angelo Dundee could have let that go on so long is beyond me, and something that really taints Dundee’s legend, as far as I’m concerned.

"Occasionally, there is a boxing match that, in its demonstration of skill, courage, intelligence, hope, seems to redeem the sport - almost. Perhaps boxing has always been a sport in crisis, a sport of crisis."

by Oli Goldstein on Jun 12, 2011 9:34 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not to mention King

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 12, 2011 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

King's a promoter - they're all pigs, and they're all willing to throw corpses into the ring.

Dundee had been with Ali almost his entire career: he knew how proud the man was; he’d heard Pacheco’s warnings; he’d seen Ali grow physically and mentally old; seen him beaten in sparring. To then let the fight go as long as it did while Ali caught a beating like no other was simply barbaric

"Occasionally, there is a boxing match that, in its demonstration of skill, courage, intelligence, hope, seems to redeem the sport - almost. Perhaps boxing has always been a sport in crisis, a sport of crisis."

by Oli Goldstein on Jun 12, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

And maybe Bowe

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dempsey was probably the closest

And Cus vocally tried to mold Mike in Dempsey’s style. Those films were part of his training. It also didn’t hurt that Tyson was such a natural born hitter. He was not in there to jab and spare

Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic

by jrok on Jun 11, 2011 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good point about Dempsey. Tyson really had impressive natural ability, though. I’m still impressed when I watch his fight films: he looks like a block of concrete, but man, is he fast and agile.

by DrRck on Jun 11, 2011 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just watched the Dempsey-Willard fight again.

Tyson had that same quick hop into a taller opponent’s range when he threw, but he was much more skillful in general.

by DrRck on Jun 11, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

No one knows, That's part of the problem

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 11, 2011 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Counterfactual conditionals.

Gotta love ’em. Cyberspace would be a lot quieter without them.

by DrRck on Jun 12, 2011 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

The BWAA plays a role in all of this. Hmmm.

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry

by Boss Man on Jun 12, 2011 3:17 PM EDT reply actions  

But I realize some people deeply care about this stuff, and I do think the debates can be interesting.

So true.

Tyson. Yes.
Michael Gerard Tyson was/is like Muhammad Ali and Rocky. They all inspired and transcended the sport of boxing. Everyone wanted to fight Mike Tyson. Many fighters define their careers by Mike Tyson. After defeating Tyson, Lennox Lewis pretty much seen it all and done it all. His last fight against Klitschko was simply a footnote in his career. Tyson’s departure from the heavyweight division of boxing is similar to Michael Jordan’s departure from basketball. Take a look at the heavyweight division today without Mike Tyson. Casual fans really don’t care. I still find it odd that after years of defining what boxing is in America, fans simply don’t care about the heavyweight division.

I tend to be biased towards strikers . . . exciting strikers.
- - - - -
VEe is ANIMated!

by VeeisAnimated on Jun 13, 2011 12:22 PM EDT reply actions  

In my oppinion Tyson was hugely overrated. The only time he fought really good fighters in their prime he was badly beaten. Once Douglas had ended the hype it was all over for him. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind though that he is an easy pick for the HOF. Love him or hate him he was the biggest name in boxing for a decade or more. If it is a hall for famous boxers then he is in. Bloody Rocky is in there for god’s. How can we be expected to take it seriously?

by LawrenceP on Jun 14, 2011 8:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Also Kosta is a worthy entrant in my oppinion.

by LawrenceP on Jun 14, 2011 8:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Zoom_2_small
Ward needs to leave SM, and SM needs him to leave
Reds_small
Ray Robinson And Cassius Clay, Together For The First Time
Buchanan
David Price and Seth Mitchell: How to Properly Develop a Heavyweight
Small
Sterioids in Boxing!!
Ali-frazier_small
Aaron Pryor vs Floyd Mayweather.
017_small
Adrien Broner - Real or Imitation
Small
Press Release: Top Rank purchases WBC
Buchanan
Is Boxing Dead?
Singleton04_small
It's Not if but When, they're fires stop burning
Reds_small
A Few Ballroom Bout Results

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

206480_10150226708710923_747385922_9037192_4017321_n_small Scott Christ

Editors & Moderators

Aki_hair_cropped_small Brickhaus

Boxing_icon_small Matt Miller

Profile_picture_small Brent Brookhouse

Ingo_small A.F.

Contributors

Henry_leeds_small Oli Goldstein

Chris_celletti_headshot_small Chris Celletti

Duran4-470x308_small Kory Kitchen

051_small Thomas Hill