Do Mike Tyson and Kostya Tszyu Belong in the Hall of Fame?
Of the three marquee fighters headed into the International Boxing Hall of Fame today in Canastota, N.Y., I think we can all agree that Mexican boxing great Julio Cesar Chavez is a deserving honoree. And while there's also Sylvester Stallone, Nacho Beristain, Joe Cortez, Harry Carpenter, A.F. Bettinson, Jack Root, Memphis Pal Moore, Dave Shade and John Gully. But let's focus on the other "big two."
"Iron" Mike Tyson, some argue, didn't actually do enough in the ring to warrant inclusion. Same goes for Kostya Tszyu, though since he is less a controversial and polarizing figure than Tyson, the debates haven't been as loud.
What do you think?
Pros in Tyson's favor are that he was one of the greatest attractions in boxing history, a true marquee star who was globally famous and at his peak, perhaps the biggest sports star in the world. The biggest con, of course, is his actual record. He was a monster in his youth, but some argue that he was monstrous against mediocrities, while losing most of his biggest fights, to the likes of Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis, and of course the stunning upset by Buster Douglas that shook the myth of the indestructible "Iron" Mike forever. After Douglas, he was never the same. After prison a couple years later, he was really never the same, and his career ended with ugly losses to Danny Williams and Kevin McBride, the type of fighter he made mincemeat of during his meteoric rise. Tyson retired with a record of 50-6 (44 KO).
Tszyu (31-2, 25 KO) reigned as junior welterweight champion for a good while before losing to Ricky Hatton in 2005 and riding off into the sunset just shy of his 36th birthday. He didn't hang on and try to pad his record, and didn't take the depressing losses many old fighters do. He was also an outstanding amateur fighter, a true amateur great, and beat a lot of contenders as a pro. But some feel he wasn't "great enough."
Personally, I don't take the Hall of Fame seriously at all. Any Hall of Fame. It's a nice gathering every year and there's no less than a good fighter in there anywhere. Barry McGuigan is a popular target for cries of disgrace, but what disgrace? It's a building with pictures in it and everyone who has ever been voted in has felt honored. I just don't get it. I'm not wired to care about the Hall of Fame beyond being happy for the guys who get in.
But I realize some people deeply care about this stuff, and I do think the debates can be interesting. So here it is: If you'd had a vote, would you have given one to Tyson and/or Tszyu?
63 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes. Mayby Kostya got in a tad early as I can make a case for others who could have gotten before him. But he belongs. Tyson is a no brainer.
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
Well, we’re on the exact same page.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on Jun 11, 2011 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I always ask myself this question: “can you tell the story of the good and important things in this sport in this athlete’s era without mentioning them?” It’s not the whole of an answer, but I find it’s a useful quick sorting mechanism. I think you’d be hard-pressed to leave out Tszyu and it would be impossible to skip Tyson, so to me they’re both fine selections.
by Brendan Welsh-Balliett on Jun 11, 2011 3:23 PM EDT reply actions
yes, precisely
I have felt that Tyson was bad for the sport, at least as bad for it as he was good, but you can’t talk about boxing at all and leave him out, and you can’t talk about it long and leave Tszyu out.
There is no safety in numbers, or in anything else--James Thurber, 1939
Kostya is one of my favourite fighters but after hearing Atlas and Tessitore on FNF saying that Tszyu probably wasn’t worthy, i analyzed his record and, to be honest, he beat a few guys who were past their best, beat a few good guys, and lost to two good guys, with the Phillips loss looking worse than the Hatton one, imo.
At forst o thought WTF is Tessitore the idiot talkng about here, but i can see where he is coming from.
Like they say, the Hall should require the highest standards for inductions.
I hate to say it but looking at his record, i think Tszyu is one of the lesser members of the Hall and probably should not be a first ballot entry.
Tyson should def be in, imo.
So, yeah, i think they should both get in. But Tyson is the only one who should have been first ballot of the two, imo.
It’s no big deal that Kostya made it first time though. He was a very good fighter.
Not to be picky, but I believe it actually is abig deal. Each year that a new recently retired guy gets in
makes it all the more difficult for a guy like Steve Collins or Davey Moore or Tony DeMarco or some Jorean or Thai great to get in. The fact is, other new guys like Oscar, MAB, maybe Camacho, maybe Hatton, will get in front of tem and then they fall farther behind allowing moire new ones to get in. I have a solution for this but I’ll save it for a Fanpost.
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
Hall of Fames
One argument for HOF inclusion in any sport is were they the best at what they did for a given stretch. Obviously the length of that given stretch is up in the air. But in regards to Tyson, whatever the competition, he was the best in the world in the mid-80s before losing to Buster.
And of course, if you want to go with the literal interpretation of Fame, there are few boxers ever that have been as famous as Iron Mike. That’s taking it a bit far, but like Brendan said above, you can’t tell the story of boxing in the 80s and 90s without talking about Tyson.
Not sure how someone can cobble together a reason Tyson doesn’t belong in the Hall of Fame. They would have to be pretty confused in my opinion.
Forget for a second all the particulars, like being the youngest champ in heavyweight history, or unifying the titles. For pete’s sake, look at some of the other guys in there. Like Boss Man says above, a no brainer.
Tszyu is a little arguable, I guess, but not Kid Dynamite.
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Not sure how someone can cobble together a reason Tyson doesn’t belong in the Hall of Fame.
It starts and ends with, “Who did he beat?”
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on Jun 11, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions
He beat fellow Hall of Famers and All-Time Greats Michael Spinks and Larry Holmes.
I’m not immune to criticisms of Mike’s career, and have made a few of my own. But I think any discussion of him not belonging in the HoF swings the pendulum too far the other way.
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
His shortlived prime was electric and his presence was awsome. He was the BIGGEST thing
in boxing and his KO’s were unreal. No way he can be kept out. NO WAY.
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
+1
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Oh I agree. But that’s the argument.
Bad Left Hook
"To the town of Agua Fria rode a stranger one fine day..."
by Scott Christ on Jun 11, 2011 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions
GDay Everyone
Tysons a dead set no brainer. Youngest heavyweight champ ever. Unified heavyweight champion ( was Mike the last fighter to do this? ) . 9 defences of the title he won off Berbick and probably the most exciting heavyweight of all time. He was the only fighter to KO Larry Holmes as well. As an Aussie I love our adopted son Kostya but he didnt really ever beat who I consider a prime , a grade gun world champion type fighter. Nearly every name on Kostya’s resume was past his best. I actually hold the Phillips fight against him far more than the Hatton debacle . Tszyu looked absolutely shot when he fought Jesse James Leija prior to the Hatton fight . I expected Hatton to beat him. The old " young hungry challenger v aging , past it champion " . scenario.
Here is what I said in Planet Boxing
Here is what I said about Tszyu in my book Planet Boxing::::Kostya Tszyu (31-2), fought from 1992-2005. Perhaps the most celebrated Russian fighter ever, Tszyu retired in 2005 with a deceptive 33 fights, for he had gone up against tough hombres virtually from the very start of his pro career. In fact, he beat Juan LaPorte in his fourth fight, and his second pro opponent had 33 fights. Known as the "Thunder from Down Under" because he had emigrated to Australia, he won the IBF Light Welterweight title in 1995 by stopping Jake Rodriguez in Las Vegas. He defended it successfully with his heavy hands until being upset by Vince Phillips in 1997. He rebounded by beating Ismael Chaves (40-5-3) in a WBC Light Welterweight Title eliminator, and then iced Calvin Grove (49-9) in the first round. In 1998, he beat Rafael Ruelas(52-3) in nine rounds to win another WBC Light Welterweight Title Eliminator, and then captured the interim WBC Light Welterweight Title by beating Cuban Diosbelys Hurtado (28-1) that same year. In 1999, the powerful Russian via Australia stopped Miguel Angel Gonzalez (43-1-1) to win the vacant WBC Light Welterweight belt. He then won 8 in a row including a blow out of former Mexican Legend Julio Cesar Chavez (103-4-2 at the time). During this streak, he also won the WBA Super World Light Welterweight title, IBF Light Welterweight title, and the WBC Light Welterweight crown. In May 2005, he lost his final fight when he could not answer the bell for round 12 against Ricky Hatton in Manchester, England. When one reviews his entire body of work, the only thing left is for the affable and articulate Tszyu is to receive the inevitable call from the International Boxing Hall of Fame. Oh yes, he compiled an amateur record of 259-11 before turning pro, but unlike so many amateurs today, he hit the road running and dispensed with walk-over fights.
My point is that if they waited a year or two, That would have been perfect.
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
Two wrongs don't make a right. Ingo should never have gotten in IMO.
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
Ingo
I have only seen him fight a couple of times on tape, against Patterson, i think, and i have to say i was distinctly unimpressed.
Mind you i never thought much to Patterson either, to be honest.
Liston crunched him.
Ingo had great power. But it was his tril;ogy with Floyd that got him in. But he lost 2 out of 3 so go figure.
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
Personally, I don’t take the Hall of Fame seriously at all.
I’m not sure if you mean you don’t take the IBHOF seriously, or you mean you don’t take ranking greatness seriously?
My view is that defining greatness should be taken seriously.
I mean, fighter’s fight mainly for money, but also to find out who is the best.
And the Hall should be reserved only for the very best, imo.
I could make a case for Pone Kingpetch – 1954-1966 Chartchai Chionoi- 1960-1975 Venice Borkhorsor – 1968-1980 Samart Payakaroon-1982-1994 (Also a legend of Muay Thai boxing) Sot Chitalada – 1983-1992 Muangchai “J-Okay” Kittikasem- 1988-1999 Samson Dutch Boy Gym – 1992-2002. - Or Masamori Tokuyama (alias Chang Soo Hong) – 1994-2006 In-Jin Chi 1991-2006 Myung-Woo “Sonagi” Yuh – 1983-1992 In-Chul Baek – 1980-1990 Soo-Hwan Hong – 1969-1980 Ki-Soo Kim 1961-1969 (South Korea’s first world boxing champion).
But I would have put Yuri Arbachakov in there first because he was a pioneer of sorts given his Japanese home base—much like Kostya’s in OZ
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
The problem with the HoF is that it’s very political and sometimes very crazy with who it inducts (see: Jose Sulaiman and Sly Stallone). With Sulaiman, I was sure they meant to say “indicts” rather than “inducts.”
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
The non-fighters all made thier bones thanks to the warriors who risk(ed) their lives in the ring. That’s my point—though never a winning one—that the Hall should be restricted to those who had an immediate impact on the outcome of a fight. Trainers, corner men,referees, and boxers. Many actors and writers have their own Halls of Fame. I bet Sly has a STAR in Hollywood. They don’t need two. Who next? Dan Rafael? Gus Johnson? The BWAA has it’s own award program. I don’t need Bert Sugar in the Hall. Or Merchant? Or Suliman? Or King? Or Arum? Or maybe a Buffer. I need more fighters.
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
They are probably going to put Lamps in there someday
To keep his disgusting buddy Larry Merchant company.
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Suliuman
is the most disgraceful inductee of all, as far as i’m aware.
He has done way more harm than good, as we know.
Who’s next Don King, Arum? They are sure things, i know. Ludicrous.
I tend to agree with your stance on this Boss Man.
It’s like how far do they want to take it?
Timekeepers and spit bucket holders will be next.
King and Arum are already in the Hall of Fame
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Oh, right
Not suprised, but then i’m only interested in looking for listed fighter’s on their website.
So it seems
fighter’s have to be retired for 5 years, but not lecherous promoters and slimy sanctioning board crooks, oh no, they get the express ticket.
I personally thought it was crazy back when Ring was ranking Tyson the #1 P4P boxer in the world (something like two or three years running, if I recall correctly). A heavyweight as #1 P4P! But, regardless of how nuts I thought it was, it still happened. Tyson was bigger than the sport of boxing for a while.
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
I think part of the reason for lesser fighter’s being inducted surely has something to do with getting countries represented in the Hall.
I mean, McGuigan (N Ireland), Johannesson (Sweden), Tszyu (Russia), although, personally i think Kostya is more worthy than the former two.
I can’t think of anymore but i’m sure there are a few who maybe shouldn’t be in there.
It’s obvious that the US has produced the vast majority of the best fighter’s over the years, and i think it’s pretty obvious that some get in because of where they are from.
Would McGuigan or Johanneson have got in if they were American? Erm, gee, let me think. :)
Also
in McGuigan’s case, i’m pretty sure his induction was partly to do wth him attracting both the Catholics and Protestants as his fans and somewhat doing his part in building peace in the country. That’s all good and something that he should be honoured for, but not in the IBHOF, imo.
The boixng Hall of Fame should be just about that – boxing at the highest level, and how good you were at it.
I like Barry. He’s a great speaker, a great man and was a good boxer, but one of the best ever? An empahtic NO, from me, i’m afraid.
He only made 3 defences, against limited oppposition, of a title he won from an admittedly very good fighter (Pedroza), but who was past his best. He then lost it to an average fighter and the Vegas heat. He only held one belt and never unified.
That does not a HoF career make, as far as i’m concerned, far from it.
This is the Hall of "Fame", after all
You could maybe make a good argument that no boxer in history was as famous as Tyson was at the height of his career. Maybe not even Ali.
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Anyone who can sing "One night in Bangkok"
Like Tyson did, deserves to be in.
by Phill on Jun 11, 2011 5:08 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I don't know the criteria
for induction into the BHOF. I think that Tszyu was finished by the Hatton fight, but during the 1990s, he was very powerful, fast, skillful, and his footwork was impressive.
Tyson was a phenomenon. He was small, even by1980s HW standards, but he in addition to his power he was incredibly fast and versatile. I can’t really think of another HW who had such a successful body attack, and who also had the uppercut Tyson had.
In an earlier, failed post
I mentioned that I regard Tyson as one of boxing’s greatest might have beens. He may have burned out early, because of his problems with significantly taller fighters, but who knows?
Tillis, Douglas, Lennox, yeah. As long as the tall guy could box AND punch, Mike was going to have problems. Even a fighter like Golota, who wasn’t especially huge, could have potentially given Mike some trouble in their fight… if he didn’t have a heart the size of a dime and willpower like a melted marshmallow. Holmes minus four or five years also probably would have handled Tyson.
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
Watching that Holmes fight
to me is like watching a movie, and expecting the ending to be different. Holmes was beautifully minimalist, IMO, and after a few more rounds could have finished Tyson.
Apropos of nothing, the most horrible fight I’ve even seen only once, and have never been able to bring myself to endure a second time, is the Holmes-Ali fight.
Yeah, that Holmes-Ali fight is horrific. How Angelo Dundee could have let that go on so long is beyond me, and something that really taints Dundee’s legend, as far as I’m concerned.
"Occasionally, there is a boxing match that, in its demonstration of skill, courage, intelligence, hope, seems to redeem the sport - almost. Perhaps boxing has always been a sport in crisis, a sport of crisis."
by Oli Goldstein on Jun 12, 2011 9:34 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
King's a promoter - they're all pigs, and they're all willing to throw corpses into the ring.
Dundee had been with Ali almost his entire career: he knew how proud the man was; he’d heard Pacheco’s warnings; he’d seen Ali grow physically and mentally old; seen him beaten in sparring. To then let the fight go as long as it did while Ali caught a beating like no other was simply barbaric
"Occasionally, there is a boxing match that, in its demonstration of skill, courage, intelligence, hope, seems to redeem the sport - almost. Perhaps boxing has always been a sport in crisis, a sport of crisis."
by Oli Goldstein on Jun 12, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Dempsey was probably the closest
And Cus vocally tried to mold Mike in Dempsey’s style. Those films were part of his training. It also didn’t hurt that Tyson was such a natural born hitter. He was not in there to jab and spare
Bad Left Hook
"My God, kids today think that the laces are for tying up the gloves."
-- Fritzie Zivic
I just watched the Dempsey-Willard fight again.
Tyson had that same quick hop into a taller opponent’s range when he threw, but he was much more skillful in general.
No one knows, That's part of the problem
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
Counterfactual conditionals.
Gotta love ’em. Cyberspace would be a lot quieter without them.
The BWAA plays a role in all of this. Hmmm.
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Mike Quarry
But I realize some people deeply care about this stuff, and I do think the debates can be interesting.
So true.
Tyson. Yes.
Michael Gerard Tyson was/is like Muhammad Ali and Rocky. They all inspired and transcended the sport of boxing. Everyone wanted to fight Mike Tyson. Many fighters define their careers by Mike Tyson. After defeating Tyson, Lennox Lewis pretty much seen it all and done it all. His last fight against Klitschko was simply a footnote in his career. Tyson’s departure from the heavyweight division of boxing is similar to Michael Jordan’s departure from basketball. Take a look at the heavyweight division today without Mike Tyson. Casual fans really don’t care. I still find it odd that after years of defining what boxing is in America, fans simply don’t care about the heavyweight division.
I tend to be biased towards strikers . . . exciting strikers.
- - - - -
VEe is ANIMated!
In my oppinion Tyson was hugely overrated. The only time he fought really good fighters in their prime he was badly beaten. Once Douglas had ended the hype it was all over for him. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind though that he is an easy pick for the HOF. Love him or hate him he was the biggest name in boxing for a decade or more. If it is a hall for famous boxers then he is in. Bloody Rocky is in there for god’s. How can we be expected to take it seriously?

by 




















