Carl Froch Rejects Fight With Nathan Cleverly
by Thomas Hill on Feb 2, 2012 8:00 AM EST
in Boxing News Analysis
Email
Print
Just a few weeks ago Nathan Cleverly branded Carl Froch as arrogant, after turning down the chance to fight the Welshman.
Now, after a period of rumours and speculation and talk, Froch has confirmed what most of us thought...there will be no fight with Cleverly, with Froch's focus still firmly on the super-middleweight division.
Froch was beaten convincingly on points in December against Andre Ward, and several fight fans around the world presumed Froch had run out of opponents and would move up in weight to challenge Cleverly. But the Cobra told Skysports there was still plenty of competition to face.
"Nobody's interested in talk about me stepping up to light-heavyweight to fight Nathan Cleverly. It's boring, there's big fights for me - Mikkel Kessler, Lucien Bute, there's more names I could roll off the tongue that would make people interested. We want to be fighting in Nottingham for a nice steady comeback fight, I don't have easy fights but I'll have a nice steady comeback and then look to challenge for a world title soon."
I'm glad Froch has dismissed this fight. Firstly I think Froch would beat Cleverly although it suits Cleverly more with the weight. Cleverly hasn't gone in to a ring with world class operators like Froch and I whole heartedly agree that Froch should focus on the bigger fights out there for him.
He can easily win more world titles, and like I said in the last article about these two, Cleverly seems to be being a little jealous and bitter about the fact Froch has no intention of boxing him...and it's got nothing to do with Froch being arrogant. Froch has been there and done it, it is time for Cleverly to do the same.
Cleverly (23-0, 11 KO) will meet Tommy Karpency on February 25 in Cardiff. Froch is still deciding what to do next, but expects a fight back in the U.K. in April or May.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Can’t really blame Froch here. He has loads of options at 168 with Kessler, Bute, Anthony Dirrell, maybe even Pavlik. Also if he moves up to 175 he has a ready-made rematch with Pascal that would do well in Canada, or fights with Dawson or Cloud. All of the above fights would probably be shown on US tv with decent money attached. A Cleverly fight at this point would be on Boxnation, for far less money. Given Cleverly’s current record, a win for Froch wouldn’t do that much for his legacy.
The situation is actually pretty similar to the Froch v Calzaghe situation of a few years ago, except this time Froch is in the position that Calzaghe was.
Nobody will read this and care and why should they?
Yeah, i agree, it’s the old risk/reward thing, “what’s in it for me?” thing.
Saying that, a fight with Cleverly would probably sell fairly well in the UK, although neither of them has a massive fan base.
"Leon Spinks is so ugly that when a tear rolls down his face, it only gets halfway, then it rolls back up" - Muhammad Ali.
Nathan, Nathan, Nathan
One is rather arrogant oneself.
"Leon Spinks is so ugly that when a tear rolls down his face, it only gets halfway, then it rolls back up" - Muhammad Ali.
I can’t believe Frank Warren couldn’t find Cleverly a better opponent for his next fight than Tommy “Who the Hell Am I?” Karpency.
I guess that he’s the mandatory challenger but even so, Nathan isn’t likely to gain many new fans with fights like this.
I thought Karpency was famously rated as number 11 inside the WBO’s top ten as told by Frank Warren.
It is a terrible fight.
Nobody will read this and care and why should they?
If so then this fight really is an atrocity and bad even by boxing’s often low standards.
I thought Warren only got a no name opponent because he had to face the mandatory, but i was just guessing.
No wonder DeGale wants to leave him.
Cleverly deserves criticism for this fight.
"Leon Spinks is so ugly that when a tear rolls down his face, it only gets halfway, then it rolls back up" - Muhammad Ali.
Yeah, Karpency’s not mandatory.
Ranked No. 11.
…in the cruiserweight division.
Keep in mind he’s not really a cruiserweight, which makes all of this EVEN FUNNIER.
I took an enormous shit on this fight right here, if you care to read it.
Bad Left Hook
"The internet has undermined professionalism in journalism, which is a good thing." - Bill James
You m ay have already heard but
Just heard this from Eddie Hearn on Ringside:
Darren Barker vs Dimitry Pirog is close to happening, apparently.
"Leon Spinks is so ugly that when a tear rolls down his face, it only gets halfway, then it rolls back up" - Muhammad Ali.
This made me laugh:
Warren, having just been told that Karpency is ranked No. 11 by the WBO (which is bullshit to start, but let’s go further), claims Karpency is a top ten ranked fighter. As much as I’d like to believe it’s just a “mistake,” it just comes off as though Warren is so smug about all of this, and so eager to lie, that he’s lying literally seconds after a fact was stated.
Yeah, Warren is a slimy snake, this much is certain.
Also, i’m beginning to wonder if Cleverly isn’t starting to doubt himself and consider his limitations, when you look at his “title defences” and how he struggled against Bellew.
I mean, surely a guy who thought that he was one of the best in the world at his weight would be telling his promoter that he wanted better fights than this steaming pile of horse shit, especially when it’s his third defence and the opponents seem to be getting progressively worse (isn’t the opposite supposed to happen?)
I am becoming less and less of a Cleverly fan by the day. Yes, i think he will be removed from my profile shortly.
"Leon Spinks is so ugly that when a tear rolls down his face, it only gets halfway, then it rolls back up" - Muhammad Ali.
This is also the negative side of Warren’s channel Boxnation, imo.
I may be wrong but i doubt Sky would have accepted this “fight”.
"Leon Spinks is so ugly that when a tear rolls down his face, it only gets halfway, then it rolls back up" - Muhammad Ali.
I have to believe Sky would have turned this down. I really, truly mean no offense to Tommy Karpency, and good for him getting his shot. Like I said, I hope he wins. But this is such a bad fight.
Bad Left Hook
"The internet has undermined professionalism in journalism, which is a good thing." - Bill James
He’s a mandatory challenger? Thought he was optional.
Either way, Cleverly better be focused on Karpency…………..or he may lose a rd.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Bad Left Hook
Related FanShots on Bad Left Hook
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
